SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The clearly false rumour

Créé par: papishark
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 9 juin 2021
Publié: 9 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Sharks have no indication of wanting to pickup another offensive D, nor are they looking to move from their leading scorer, but apparently this is a trendy rumour in leafs circles now
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 250 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 000 000 $
34 000 000 $
55 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
3.
SJS
  1. Patrick, Nolan [Droits de RFA]
PHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 048 334 $0 $667 500 $7 451 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
776 667 $776 667 $ (Bonis de performance110 000 $$110K)
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 juin 2021 à 14 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,866
Mentions "j'aime": 7,417
the leafs have no interest in trading for a past prime 7 million dollar player for their only very good offensive defender.
HappyKampfers a aimé ceci.
9 juin 2021 à 14 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,213
Mentions "j'aime": 18,741
I'd think Leafs would add there
papishark a aimé ceci.
9 juin 2021 à 14 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,275
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
the leafs have no interest in trading for a past prime 7 million dollar player for their only very good offensive defender.


Hence why the post is called “the clearly false rumor”. Sharks don’t want any part of that trade but it keeps popping up everywhere.
papishark et Burnzie8_88_4Cup a aimé ceci.
9 juin 2021 à 14 h 37
#4
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I'd think Leafs would add there


That's quite hysterical that you say that actually.

Why would Toronto add, or even be interested in Kane? An overpaid winger that causes more off-ice issues than he's worth? A guy that can't stay away from Vegas and filed for bankruptcy because of it? Toronto management has made it a priority since day 1 not to tolerate off-ice issues - it's the main reason why Kapanen was traded. They're not gonna add more to this type of deal or even be interested in a guy like Kane because of it.
9 juin 2021 à 14 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,213
Mentions "j'aime": 18,741
Quoting: TrueCanuck
That's quite hysterical that you say that actually.

Why would Toronto add, or even be interested in Kane? An overpaid winger that causes more off-ice issues than he's worth? A guy that can't stay away from Vegas and filed for bankruptcy because of it? Toronto management has made it a priority since day 1 not to tolerate off-ice issues - it's the main reason why Kapanen was traded. They're not gonna add more to this type of deal or even be interested in a guy like Kane because of it.


I am not commenting on Leaf management.
I am saying, to most teams, 1-year of Rielly is worth less than 4 years of Kane.
9 juin 2021 à 14 h 45
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,866
Mentions "j'aime": 7,417
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Hence why the post is called “the clearly false rumor”. Sharks don’t want any part of that trade but it keeps popping up everywhere.


sure, i was just adding that it makes zero sense for the leafs too
9 juin 2021 à 15 h 1
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,275
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
sure, i was just adding that it makes zero sense for the leafs too


Yeah it’s mutually assured destruction lol
9 juin 2021 à 15 h 6
#8
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I am not commenting on Leaf management.
I am saying, to most teams, 1-year of Rielly is worth less than 4 years of Kane.


with Kanes off-ice issues... not he's not
9 juin 2021 à 15 h 27
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: TrueCanuck
with Kanes off-ice issues... not he's not


Better not trade for Giroux or Patrick Kane then. Or Ryan O Reilly while we are at it. With what they have done no way they could have value
9 juin 2021 à 15 h 33
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,213
Mentions "j'aime": 18,741
Quoting: papishark
Better not trade for Giroux or Patrick Kane then. Or Ryan O Reilly while we are at it. With what they have done no way they could have value


*what they have allegedly done
9 juin 2021 à 15 h 36
#11
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: papishark
Better not trade for Giroux or Patrick Kane then. Or Ryan O Reilly while we are at it. With what they have done no way they could have value


Kane's rap sheet is far longer. There were issues with him back in his Winnipeg/Atlanta days. This isn't just a 1 time thing. It's multiple with him. & he continues to have off-ice feuds with Ryan Reaves still. When there's a long line up of issues, it drops a player's value significantly.

But hey, maybe if Toronto trades for him he can bring MLSE some more money by agreeing to fight Logan Paul at the ScotiaBank Arena.
9 juin 2021 à 15 h 47
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: NHLfan10506
*what they have allegedly done


Kane never committed a felony. He has debt issues yeah but I’d say crashing into a Tim bottoms drunk is worse than being bad with money
9 juin 2021 à 16 h 3
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,213
Mentions "j'aime": 18,741
Quoting: papishark
Kane never committed a felony. He has debt issues yeah but I’d say crashing into a Tim bottoms drunk is worse than being bad with money


Ryan O'Reilly, Patrick Kane and Claude Giroux are NOT felons.

Evander Kane is no angel, but doesn't mean you have to trade him.
9 juin 2021 à 16 h 16
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Ryan O'Reilly, Patrick Kane and Claude Giroux are NOT felons.

Evander Kane is no angel, but doesn't mean you have to trade him.


I don’t think he’s an angel, but if worse things didn’t strip guys of all value, then Kane should also be fine.
12 juin 2021 à 2 h 35
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,338
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: papishark
I don’t think he’s an angel, but if worse things didn’t strip guys of all value, then Kane should also be fine.


Do you think there would be a deal to be made to acquire lehner via Seattle?
12 juin 2021 à 11 h 0
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: vols94
Do you think there would be a deal to be made to acquire lehner via Seattle?

Possibly. Would depend on what they would ask for him. The sharks aren’t going to give away a bunch to a rival for a goalie that got beat out for a starting role he was given every chance to keep.
12 juin 2021 à 20 h 57
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,338
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: papishark
Possibly. Would depend on what they would ask for him. The sharks aren’t going to give away a bunch to a rival for a goalie that got beat out for a starting role he was given every chance to keep.


yeah I thought about the got beat of part of it but he is signed for a decent rate for #1 goalie, played pretty well over the last couple of years and is a huge upgrade in our weakest position. I have been thinking maybe this team could be turned around with trying to dump all of the bad contracts if we just got league avg goaltending.
papishark a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2021 à 4 h 56
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,762
Mentions "j'aime": 529
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Hence why the post is called “the clearly false rumor”. Sharks don’t want any part of that trade but it keeps popping up everywhere.




I agree, we can't afford to lose 25-30 goals for a LHD, when we already have Knyzhov to play with EK65.
papishark a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2021 à 4 h 57
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,762
Mentions "j'aime": 529
Quoting: papishark
Possibly. Would depend on what they would ask for him. The sharks aren’t going to give away a bunch to a rival for a goalie that got beat out for a starting role he was given every chance to keep.



I think Vegas would keep Lehner, MAF isn't going to play forever.
13 juin 2021 à 5 h 3
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,762
Mentions "j'aime": 529
Quoting: TrueCanuck
That's quite hysterical that you say that actually.

Why would Toronto add, or even be interested in Kane? An overpaid winger that causes more off-ice issues than he's worth? A guy that can't stay away from Vegas and filed for bankruptcy because of it? Toronto management has made it a priority since day 1 not to tolerate off-ice issues - it's the main reason why Kapanen was traded. They're not gonna add more to this type of deal or even be interested in a guy like Kane because of it.




How is a potential 30 goal scorer in his prime at $7 mill overpaid? J.Skinner, he's overpaid, not Kane.
papishark a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage