SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

1 for 1

Créé par: MetaKnight
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 3 juin 2021
Publié: 3 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Lets you bring back Hyman & probably extend Reilly.
Also could add veteran winger or centre if you don't think both Robertson & Amirov will be ready or want more proven depth down the middle, as long as it's a one year deal.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
1750 000 $
11 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 590 950 $0 $532 500 $6 909 050 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
764 167 $764 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 juin 2021 à 20 h 26
#1
Dubas intern
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 859
Mentions "j'aime": 116
The marner tkachuk trade is one if I am the Leafs I consider. It doesnt hurt that Matthews is good friends with him
3 juin 2021 à 20 h 28
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,821
Mentions "j'aime": 624
Flames decline, we don’t want the $3 mil increase. Plus Marner shouldn’t be traded, the Leafs would be smart to keep him
mauston_atthews et Flamecity a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2021 à 20 h 28
#3
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,575
Mentions "j'aime": 895
Like any fan of any team, I’d love tkachuk on the leafs, but I don’t think Calgary want marner over him. Marner doesn’t play sutter’s style and won’t do well there. We should just keep him too tbh. When you have a talent like him who can’t get it together mentally clearly in the playoffs, you try and work it out rather than make a huge transaction that you likely won’t win.
Josh et CJets a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2021 à 20 h 36
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,632
Mentions "j'aime": 19,735
I really wish Toronto would just make the 2nd round already so we dont have to see 25 Marner for Tkachuk posts every day of the offseason. Flames aren't moving Tkachuk for another Gaudreau
Flamecity et CJets a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2021 à 20 h 45
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,963
Mentions "j'aime": 1,564
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I really wish Toronto would just make the 2nd round already so we dont have to see 25 Marner for Tkachuk posts every day of the offseason. Flames aren't moving Tkachuk for another Gaudreau


better get used to it, as long as they do not trade marner, they aint winning a round of playoff hockey
3 juin 2021 à 20 h 53
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,901
Mentions "j'aime": 22,900
Quoting: mauston_atthews
Like any fan of any team, I’d love tkachuk on the leafs, but I don’t think Calgary want marner over him. Marner doesn’t play sutter’s style and won’t do well there. We should just keep him too tbh. When you have a talent like him who can’t get it together mentally clearly in the playoffs, you try and work it out rather than make a huge transaction that you likely won’t win.


So you get Tkachuk who has been with the Flames for 5 years. Missed the playoffs twice, Only won a preliminary round in the expanded playoffs last season. So what's the magic of Tkachuk and his playoff mentality over Marner? While Tkachuk is a good player, he gets a notoriety for his shenanigans rather than overall play.
3 juin 2021 à 21 h 11
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,632
Mentions "j'aime": 19,735
Quoting: athrin
better get used to it, as long as they do not trade marner, they aint winning a round of playoff hockey


Marner will figure out playoff hockey eventually, the issue is they need that to happen before Matthews contract ends and bringing in guys that can teach it requires cap space they don't really have. I guess they could look for a coach that can do it though
4 juin 2021 à 5 h 26
#8
Flames
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,177
Mentions "j'aime": 367
Quoting: palhal
So you get Tkachuk who has been with the Flames for 5 years. Missed the playoffs twice, Only won a preliminary round in the expanded playoffs last season. So what's the magic of Tkachuk and his playoff mentality over Marner? While Tkachuk is a good player, he gets a notoriety for his shenanigans rather than overall play.


While that's all true, he is also our next captain. On his next big contract he'll make less than Marner, he plays all facets of the games not just regular season point totals. He can play on a shutdown line, as well as the net front presence on the powerplay that Marner outright refuses to do or try. On top of all of that he's a locker room guy, you can't trade away a guy like him for anything less than Eichel, I dont care how many points Marner scores in the regular season it makes no difference when he's an outright no show in the playoffs, and the Flames already have a guy exactly like that in Johnny Gaudreau.

The notoriety for his shenanigans only overshadows his overall play because he has that kind of reputation, you'll remember a bad hit he made over a 6 game pt streak he had for example, but we as Flames fans can look past all that and see how special and rare a player he is. So no it isn't happening in this or any other lifetime, Flames have no interest in Mitch Marner.
4 juin 2021 à 5 h 27
#9
Flames
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,177
Mentions "j'aime": 367
No
4 juin 2021 à 18 h 33
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,901
Mentions "j'aime": 22,900
Quoting: Ansabch12
While that's all true, he is also our next captain. On his next big contract he'll make less than Marner, he plays all facets of the games not just regular season point totals. He can play on a shutdown line, as well as the net front presence on the powerplay that Marner outright refuses to do or try. On top of all of that he's a locker room guy, you can't trade away a guy like him for anything less than Eichel, I dont care how many points Marner scores in the regular season it makes no difference when he's an outright no show in the playoffs, and the Flames already have a guy exactly like that in Johnny Gaudreau.

Sorry, you don't know "if he's a locker room guy". You may have a point about Marner good regular season production versus his poor post season production, but geez look at the facts....Tkachuk has led the Flames to much success?
As for being the next captain. He has 21/22 at 7m contract. Then he just one year away from being a UFA. Apparently his qualifying offer is 9m, if he doesn't resign. But if the Flames finish out of the playoffs again, do you really think Tkachuk will want to remain in Calgary long term?

The notoriety for his shenanigans only overshadows his overall play because he has that kind of reputation, you'll remember a bad hit he made over a 6 game pt streak he had for example, but we as Flames fans can look past all that and see how special and rare a player he is. So no it isn't happening in this or any other lifetime, Flames have no interest in Mitch Marner.
4 juin 2021 à 21 h 55
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 545
Mentions "j'aime": 57
Quoting: Ansabch12
While that's all true, he is also our next captain. On his next big contract he'll make less than Marner, he plays all facets of the games not just regular season point totals. He can play on a shutdown line, as well as the net front presence on the powerplay that Marner outright refuses to do or try. On top of all of that he's a locker room guy, you can't trade away a guy like him for anything less than Eichel, I dont care how many points Marner scores in the regular season it makes no difference when he's an outright no show in the playoffs, and the Flames already have a guy exactly like that in Johnny Gaudreau.

The notoriety for his shenanigans only overshadows his overall play because he has that kind of reputation, you'll remember a bad hit he made over a 6 game pt streak he had for example, but we as Flames fans can look past all that and see how special and rare a player he is. So no it isn't happening in this or any other lifetime, Flames have no interest in Mitch Marner.


Yup which is why this makes sense for the Leafs but no interest...you mean in this deal right? Cause Marner is easily better then the rest of Flames forwards.

Also Eichel on the Flames would be good but you should be aiming to add Eichel to Tkachuk, not for Tkachuk.
4 juin 2021 à 23 h 54
#12
Flames
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,177
Mentions "j'aime": 367
Quoting: palhal


Actually I have the same amount of evidence for him being a locker room guy as Marner being locker room cancer. We aren't in there and we dont know what goes down all we can do is speculate, and based on how he talks to the media and how competitive he is, I have more than enough reason to believe hes a locker room guy.

This whole narrative that he won't re-sign in Calgary is such a bad faith argument, Brad Treliving isnt letting him walk and he wont pull a PLD like on us. When was the last time a young forward as valuable as Tkachuk abandoned his team and went into free agency. Its the same thing as me saying that Matthews is going to leave at the end of his contract, thats not a good point to justify this or any other Marner for Tkachuk trade.
4 juin 2021 à 23 h 59
#13
Flames
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,177
Mentions "j'aime": 367
Quoting: MetaKnight
Yup which is why this makes sense for the Leafs but no interest...you mean in this deal right? Cause Marner is easily better then the rest of Flames forwards.

Also Eichel on the Flames would be good but you should be aiming to add Eichel to Tkachuk, not for Tkachuk.


I really dont know if you can say hes easily better than anyone rn, he has 0 goals in 17 playoff games. As we learned from this year and previous years regular season point totals mean absolutely nothing. You didnt pay him 11 mil to be top 5 scoring, you paid him to win in the playoffs.

Quoting: MetaKnight
Yup which is why this makes sense for the Leafs but no interest...you mean in this deal right? Cause Marner is easily better then the rest of Flames forwards.

Also Eichel on the Flames would be good but you should be aiming to add Eichel to Tkachuk, not for Tkachuk.




You're right but if im the Sabres the trade discussions begin and end with Tkachuk
MetaKnight a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2021 à 9 h 25
#14
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,901
Mentions "j'aime": 22,900
Quoting: Ansabch12
Actually I have the same amount of evidence for him being a locker room guy as Marner being locker room cancer. We aren't in there and we dont know what goes down all we can do is speculate, and based on how he talks to the media and how competitive he is, I have more than enough reason to believe hes a locker room guy.

This whole narrative that he won't re-sign in Calgary is such a bad faith argument, Brad Treliving isnt letting him walk and he wont pull a PLD like on us. When was the last time a young forward as valuable as Tkachuk abandoned his team and went into free agency. Its the same thing as me saying that Matthews is going to leave at the end of his contract, thats not a good point to justify this or any other Marner for Tkachuk trade.


It isn't a bad faith argument. It isn't necessarily Brad Treiliving decision on whether Tkachuk's Leafs as a UFA. You're right not too many players leave as soon a contractually possible, the main reason is they still haven't been paid big money as RFASs. McDavid, Eichel and Matthews have set the tone, as with some other RFAs...who now are getting UFA money in their first RFA contract. Matthews, it's an easy prediction to say he will be leaving the Leafs as UFA. I don't know why anyone would think Matthews isn't going to explore his options and either get big money or better opportunities elsewhere. I predict he goes to big USA market.
Fans are FANtical. When a UFA signs with THEIR after they leaving another team, the fans are so happy....That player loves our team, city and the fans. But when a UFA leaves his team, the fans think the player is a traitor.
Let's have this discussion in two years. Still my prediction is , that Tkachuk is not going to sign long term in Calgary. Only question is whether the Flames trade him for assets or he truly walks as UFA from the Flames.
Let's see what Reinhart of the Sabres does. He can be a UFA in the summer of 2022. Three options, Sabres trade him for assets, Sabres sign him long term, Reinhart signs a qualifying offer which will make him a UFA next summer. For Reinhart 7 years a Sabres is the most he will do. I feel the same way about Tkachuk. Especially if the Flames aren't successful, no way he stays a Flame most than his minimum of seven years.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage