SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Wish List

Créé par: EvanW
Équipe: 2021-22 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 4 mai 2021
Publié: 4 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Assume ~$7MM is needed to resign Robertson, Klingberg, and Oettinger. Current space with Radulov expiring creates this. Pray that the cap is only flat for a couple of seasons, there is a compliance buyout ($9MM), and / or that Damiani, Mascherin, Bourque, Stranges, or L'Esperance can fill Hall and Radulov's spots. Yikes.
Hall takes bridge to restore value and play with similar Seguin.
LTIR guys are options if Damiani is not ready.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
46 000 000 $
77 500 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
43 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
42 750 000 $
26 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Gaglardi, Sells
11 000 000 $
Nill, Replaced
11 000 000 $
Bowness, Replaced
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
DAL
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Sekera, Andrej
Détails additionnels:
Sun. Do not care who, needs to be gone.
2.
DAL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Pavelski, Joe
Détails additionnels:
NY needs a center that can win a face off, and some veteran scoring. Pavelski is that guy and comes off the books after one season.
3.
DAL
  1. Laine, Patrik [Droits de RFA]
CBJ
  1. Gurianov, Denis
  2. Lindell, Esa
Détails additionnels:
Lindell is my least favorite player on the team. Despite advanced metrics and TOI, he is who he is which is a player that fails to clear the puck twice on a PK last week against TBL. If he is not gone before NMC kicks in, team will waste the current youth and be set back ~5 years.
4.
DAL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (SEA)
SEA
  1. Caamano, Nicholas [Droits de RFA]
  2. Dickinson, Jason [Droits de RFA]
  3. Honka, Julius [Droits de RFA]
  4. Khudobin, Anton
  5. Tufte, Riley
  6. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
Dickinson is the expansion pick. Send some lesser prospects and pick to SEA for them to take remaining years of Khudobin as well.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de SEA
2022
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2023
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de ANA
Logo de DAL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2684 500 000 $83 693 739 $927 073 $2 352 500 $806 261 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Gaglardi, Sells
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Nill, Replaced
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Bowness, Replaced
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Stars de Dallas
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C
UFA - 2
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
803 333 $803 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
G
RFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 mai 2021 à 16 h 33
#1
Jinx god
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,205
Mentions "j'aime": 13,730
I imagine Pavs gets more. I would wait for a decision from Bishop before moving Dobby, his injury history could make him think about retirement.
4 mai 2021 à 16 h 39
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 86
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: EsoYeezus69
I imagine Pavs gets more. I would wait for a decision from Bishop before moving Dobby, his injury history could make him think about retirement.


I do too, but I find it easier to undervalue to make a point as opposed to get people that do not agree and get hung up on value. This scenario is assuming Bishop is fine, my next year "wish list."
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
4 mai 2021 à 16 h 44
#3
Jinx god
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,205
Mentions "j'aime": 13,730
Quoting: EvanW
I do too, but I find it easier to undervalue to make a point as opposed to get people that do not agree and get hung up on value. This scenario is assuming Bishop is fine, my next year "wish list."


Fair enough, I get were you’re coming from.
4 mai 2021 à 17 h 42
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,280
Mentions "j'aime": 2,540
Quoting: EvanW
I do too, but I find it easier to undervalue to make a point as opposed to get people that do not agree and get hung up on value. This scenario is assuming Bishop is fine, my next year "wish list."


I’d take that in a heart, if you made a 2nd and 4th I’d take it without a question
EvanW a aimé ceci.
4 mai 2021 à 19 h 16
#5
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,809
Mentions "j'aime": 3,292
Not trading Laine without getting a top-6 C back. In particular, we're more than set at LD, so Lindell is not of all that high interest.
4 mai 2021 à 21 h 2
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Rangers decline unless you're going to retain 50%. I think they'll take their chances with guys like Henrique (50% retained) or Brandon Sutter as far as the faceoff dot goes.
4 mai 2021 à 21 h 30
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,298
Mentions "j'aime": 2,732
I wouldn’t swap Guri for Laine one for one. Guri is cheaper and isn’t useless without the puck

And Pavs is a ppg player with no term remaining. I’d imagine he’s worth quite a bit more than that. Especially since if we’re trading guys like him retaining wouldn’t be an issue which just makes him even more appealing
5 mai 2021 à 12 h 36
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 86
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Viqsi
Not trading Laine without getting a top-6 C back. In particular, we're more than set at LD, so Lindell is not of all that high interest.


Yeah just assuming Tortorella stays, Laine makes it known he's done, and Jones is gone when his contract runs up. Obviously a wishlist from the outside looking in, but not a terrible return for Laine if that happens. Lindell fits the system and can play the other side if need be.

Quoting: SlevinKalevra
I wouldn’t swap Guri for Laine one for one. Guri is cheaper and isn’t useless without the puck

And Pavs is a ppg player with no term remaining. I’d imagine he’s worth quite a bit more than that. Especially since if we’re trading guys like him retaining wouldn’t be an issue which just makes him even more appealing


I wouldn't either because there is no way to make that $ work. Still think a true goal scorer is needed, and Laine>>>Gurianov. I think Laine would fit in well here, and whatever slack Laine brings could be absorbed. Yeah, see above. I undervalued just to make a point about the deal. Retaining some $ and getting more return would be the likely scenario.
5 mai 2021 à 18 h 19
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,298
Mentions "j'aime": 2,732
Quoting: EvanW
Yeah just assuming Tortorella stays, Laine makes it known he's done, and Jones is gone when his contract runs up. Obviously a wishlist from the outside looking in, but not a terrible return for Laine if that happens. Lindell fits the system and can play the other side if need be.



I wouldn't either because there is no way to make that $ work. Still think a true goal scorer is needed, and Laine>>>Gurianov. I think Laine would fit in well here, and whatever slack Laine brings could be absorbed. Yeah, see above. I undervalued just to make a point about the deal. Retaining some $ and getting more return would be the likely scenario.


That’s fair but I guess I just disagree on the Stars “needing a true goal scorer”. We have some very nice offensive players. I honestly think letting Bones concentrate on the defense and getting a proper head coach would be a step in the right direction. Moving on from guys like Cogliano and Comeau would be a step in the right direction. So on. I’d rather focus on replacing those vets with younger more talented players. So yes Laine might be a better offensive weapon but how much do you lose at the other end on defense when he’s playing with the controller disconnected? Unless they’ve changed it recently, the wall says “everybody ropes, everybody rides”. And Laine isn’t one of those players. So I’d rather keep Guri who I know fits the system and add another quality player like Armia or Coleman. See if we can get a third line going. Call me old school but I don’t think a system should support a player and skilled players shouldn’t be exempt from defensive responsibility. Even a strong defensive system like the Stars’ can’t always cover for totally blown coverage
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage