SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

We might be getting Clarke

Créé par: csick
Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 22 avr. 2021
Publié: 22 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let’s say it goes like this:
Buffalo: Beniers
Anaheim: Guenther
Seattle : Power
Devils: Hughes
Ottawa: Would have to go Clarke here
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
33 100 000 $
11 000 000 $
77 000 000 $
88 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Clarke, Brandt
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
SEA
  1. Brown, Logan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Zaitsev, Nikita
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
2.
OTT
    Any team
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    2022
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de SJS
    2023
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NSH
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $58 710 083 $0 $4 932 500 $22 789 917 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    749 250 $749 250 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG
    RFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
    DG/DD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Clarke, Brandt
    925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $ (75 000 $$75K75 000 $$75K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    C, AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 29
    #26
    Saskoiler for now
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 13,332
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,245
    Ottawa already looks like a good team in the future.
    Really excited to see what they look like in a few years. They are one of my favourite teams.
    Clarke would be a good selection in my opinion, he should be the top player Ottawa wants. Other than maybe Guether. Because drafting by need is most important this year instead of best player available.
    csick, athrin et TohnJavares a aimé ceci.
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 30
    #27
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 9,527
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
    i mean i feel like we’d take eklund in this case, but if we did nab clarke then brannstrom would have to be out the door for a high end F prospect
    csick a aimé ceci.
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 31
    #28
    Démarrer sujet
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 43,804
    Mentions "j'aime": 24,508
    Quoting: faulkmydzingel
    So does Dorion do the hockey world a favour this offseason and acquire Zadorov? Zub, Zaitsev, and Zadorov down the right side would be fun.


    I don’t think there’s room, I see 1 spot open for next year:
    Chabot-JBD
    Brannstrom-Zub
    Mete-XXX
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 33
    #29
    Démarrer sujet
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 43,804
    Mentions "j'aime": 24,508
    Quoting: Alfie11
    i mean i feel like we’d take eklund in this case, but if we did nab clarke then brannstrom would have to be out the door for a high end F prospect


    Yeah I don’t think we can go wrong , anywhere here. I’d go :
    1) Guenther
    2) Beniers
    3) Clarke
    4) Johnson/Eklund
    Imo but yeah if we take Clarke, it would be Brannstrom + for a top line winger
    Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 39
    #30
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,075
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,486
    Quoting: Salzy
    As long as the Ducks get Guenther everyone else can have whoever they want tears of joy


    I won't let you steal Guenther from us
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 40
    #31
    Démarrer sujet
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 43,804
    Mentions "j'aime": 24,508
    Quoting: zyyyp
    I won't let you steal Guenther from us


    No way NJ doesn’t take a D Imo. They’ll get one of Hughes/Power or maybe even Clarke imo
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 42
    #32
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,075
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,486
    Quoting: csick
    No way NJ doesn’t take a D Imo. They’ll get one of Hughes/Power or maybe even Clarke imo


    if Hughes and Clarke are on the board I agree with you, I just want Guenther hahah
    csick a aimé ceci.
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 45
    #33
    Démarrer sujet
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 43,804
    Mentions "j'aime": 24,508
    Quoting: zyyyp
    if Hughes and Clarke are on the board I agree with you, I just want Guenther hahah


    Everyone wants Guenther. He’s like a Kyle Connor but way better defensively and way more dynamic.
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 45
    #34
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 2,493
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,104
    Quoting: csick
    Yeah I don’t think we can go wrong , anywhere here. I’d go :
    1) Guenther
    2) Beniers
    3) Clarke
    4) Johnson/Eklund
    Imo but yeah if we take Clarke, it would be Brannstrom + for a top line winger


    But they play different sides? I feel like it wouldn’t affect Brannstrom at all, plus Clarke is most likely still a year or two away
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 48
    #35
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,075
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,486
    Quoting: csick
    Everyone wants Guenther. He’s like a Kyle Connor but way better defensively and way more dynamic.


    and he can play either wing, goes to hard areas, a lot to like about his game.

    Guenther-Hughes-Holtz

    line in the future would be sweet.
    csick a aimé ceci.
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 49
    #36
    Démarrer sujet
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 43,804
    Mentions "j'aime": 24,508
    Quoting: zyyyp
    and he can play either wing, goes to hard areas, a lot to like about his game.

    Guenther-Hughes-Holtz

    line in the future would be sweet.


    I want Ottawa to get him but not holding my breath:
    Tkachuk-Norris-Batherson
    Stutzle-Pinto-Guenther
    zyyyp a aimé ceci.
    22 avr. 2021 à 12 h 57
    #37
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 9,527
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
    Quoting: TheBoyDuddus
    But they play different sides? I feel like it wouldn’t affect Brannstrom at all, plus Clarke is most likely still a year or two away

    We already have 3 lefties who will likely be in our long term top 4 (chabot/sanderson/brannstrom) so one of them will most likely be playing the right side at some point, and the obvious choice is brannstrom who has experience there (and iirc is quoted as saying he prefers the right side). Clarke plays the same style as brannstrom in that they are both dynamic offensively, but as a natural right handed guy it would make sense to have him partnered with a defensive left handed guy (like sanderson) which leaves brannstrom outside our top 4, which is demeaning to his skill level, meaning we should trade him to get max value back by adding to our forward core if we draft clarke.

    Quoting: csick
    I don’t think there’s room, I see 1 spot open for next year:
    Chabot-JBD
    Brannstrom-Zub
    Mete-XXX

    I think we might try to add a 2LD. Something like chabot-zub / 2LD-zaitsev / brannstrom-jbd / mete-brown would be decent depth without thrusting the young guys into the top 4 too early
    csick a aimé ceci.
    22 avr. 2021 à 13 h 12
    #38
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 5,157
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,976
    Quoting: zyyyp
    and he can play either wing, goes to hard areas, a lot to like about his game.

    Guenther-Hughes-Holtz

    line in the future would be sweet.


    Quoting: csick
    I want Ottawa to get him but not holding my breath:
    Tkachuk-Norris-Batherson
    Stutzle-Pinto-Guenther


    We can all agree that Comtois-Zegras-Guenther is the line everyone wants to happen tears of joy
    22 avr. 2021 à 17 h 5
    #39
    Talking Senators
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 694
    Mentions "j'aime": 175
    Quoting: Salzy
    As long as the Ducks get Guenther everyone else can have whoever they want tears of joy

    Comtois-Zegras-Guenther
    Tracey-Lundestrom-Terry
    Jones-Steel-Perreault

    God that first line would be gross

    This excites me
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage