SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

open that window back up

Créé par: bahston
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 20 avr. 2021
Publié: 20 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Move Debrusk and package for a top 4 LD now that LW is log jammed if Hall resigns. Could probably do better then Hanifin, maybe OEL but would have to make the money work.

Resign Kase if he can still play and stay healthy, bring in a backup plan like Rodrigues to compete for 3RW.

Resign Miller but have him as a 7th defenseman and you can manage his knee so it’s ready for playoffs.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3750 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 750 000 $
32 750 000 $
3750 000 $
11 250 000 $
2975 000 $
2750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
36 000 000 $
26 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
11 250 000 $
26 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
    SEATTLE
    2.
    CGY
    1. DeBrusk, Jake
    2. Vaakanainen, Urho
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
    Détails additionnels:
    Too much? Too little?
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2023
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $77 548 174 $1 956 507 $125 000 $3 951 826 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    C
    UFA
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    975 000 $975 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA
    Équipe de réserve
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 13
    #1
    GO FLAMES GO
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 18,408
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,719
    Add more to Calgary deal. He is to important to us
    bahston a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 14
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 77
    Mentions "j'aime": 5
    Quoting: Gmonwy
    Add more to Calgary deal. He is to important to us

    Higher pick? Or another prospect?
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 15
    #3
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    If the options are stick with internal options, or go after hanifin, I’d say roll with what the bruins have. I find hanifin so unimpressive.

    Shoot for something better, or keep it simple. Lindholm comes to mind. If you’re going to go after a guy like that, can’t re-sign Reilly. The bruins made such a big deal of letting left shot d walk so they could play the young guys they have developed, and you think that’s just going to last a year?

    One year deal for krejci btw. Three is crazy.

    Ditch kase, insert studnicka.

    Kuraly is worth bringing back.
    bahston a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 17
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 38,705
    Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
    Flames dont touch that, Hanifin is borderline untouchable currently
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 17
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 1,210
    Mentions "j'aime": 465
    Modifié 20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 25
    Too much $$$ for Krejci and Rask. They need to be resigned, but on more team-friendly deals. I'd look for a more reliable 2nd/3rd line RW than Kase. I'm also willing to bet Lauzon or Zboril are taken over Clifton. Lastly, Beecher is returning to Michigan next year. But if he was to sign, it'd be for the rookie maximum, not minimum ($925K).
    bahston a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 18
    #6
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Flames dont touch that, Hanifin is borderline untouchable currently


    What is he good at?
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 21
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 38,705
    Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    What is he good at?


    Puck moving, creating scoring chances, strong defensively. His issue is actually hitting the net but that is fixable with training. Hes had a very under the radar breakout year, and since Ward was fired hes been producing at 0.5 ppg
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 21
    #8
    Watches no games
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 3,268
    Mentions "j'aime": 977
    Quoting: Gmonwy
    Add more to Calgary deal. He is to important to us


    Quoting: bahston
    Higher pick? Or another prospect?


    I don't want him for that price. He *looks* like a good hockey player, but doesn't even carry his own contract's weight
    bahston a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 23
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 77
    Mentions "j'aime": 5
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    If the options are stick with internal options, or go after hanifin, I’d say roll with what the bruins have. I find hanifin so unimpressive.

    Shoot for something better, or keep it simple. Lindholm comes to mind. If you’re going to go after a guy like that, can’t re-sign Reilly. The bruins made such a big deal of letting left shot d walk so they could play the young guys they have developed, and you think that’s just going to last a year?

    One year deal for krejci btw. Three is crazy.

    Ditch kase, insert studnicka.

    Kuraly is worth bringing back.

    Yeah that’s a good point about the Left side being a spot they’re trying to fix from within. Only issue is if you’re resigning guys like Krejci and Rask to 1-2 year deals then you can’t really wait for the kids to grow.

    Yeah agree, Kase is a massive reach. Figured could give him an incentive type contract if he can even play anymore. I Stayed away from Studnicka at RW because I thought they were trying to develop him as a center.

    If you go with internal options at LD what do you do with Debrusk, hang on to him and put him at 3RW again?
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 26
    #10
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: bahston
    Yeah that’s a good point about the Left side being a spot they’re trying to fix from within. Only issue is if you’re resigning guys like Krejci and Rask to 1-2 year deals then you can’t really wait for the kids to grow.

    Yeah agree, Kase is a massive reach. Figured could give him an incentive type contract if he can even play anymore. I Stayed away from Studnicka at RW because I thought they were trying to develop him as a center.

    If you go with internal options at LD what do you do with Debrusk, hang on to him and put him at 3RW again?


    Yes on debrusk.

    Studnicka has to be in the NHL next year. Ditch Kase and ritchie if need be. They’ve played him at wing.

    The kids have grown. They’ve looked good. Let at least one of them play the left side. The way i see it you’ve made the left side very very very marginally better. If you were going to go get an actual good left d, i might look at it differently.
    bahston a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 27
    #11
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Puck moving, creating scoring chances, strong defensively. His issue is actually hitting the net but that is fixable with training. Hes had a very under the radar breakout year, and since Ward was fired hes been producing at 0.5 ppg

    I think he’s just solid at most things, not really good at anything. He’s a solid player. Not more than that.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 29
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 38,705
    Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    I think he’s just solid at most things, not really good at anything. He’s a solid player. Not more than that.


    Well you probably havent seen him that mich this year but hes taken major strides from previous seasons. I would say he's a clearcut #2 caliber dman at this point
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 33
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 77
    Mentions "j'aime": 5
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    Yes on debrusk.

    Studnicka has to be in the NHL next year. Ditch Kase and ritchie if need be. They’ve played him at wing.

    The kids have grown. They’ve looked good. Let at least one of them play the left side. The way i see it you’ve made the left side very very very marginally better. If you were going to go get an actual good left d, i might look at it differently.


    It seemed like a set back year to me this year for Studnicka, he looked a lot better in the bubble of 2020 then he did in his games this year at the wing. So i assumed they were working on his game at center Prov. to get him ready to go when there’s a spot. Although, they brought in another center at the deadline, so a little confused where they’re headed with him.

    Yeah would much prefer Lindholm to Hanifin but their GM seemed very confident about resigning him. Hanifin probably isn’t much of an improvement or what we need for that spot.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 34
    #14
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Well you probably havent seen him that mich this year but hes taken major strides from previous seasons. I would say he's a clearcut #2 caliber dman at this point


    I’ll give you rock solid number four. I’ve seen Calgary play plenty. I love watching the north division. Never know what’s going to happen it that gong show.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 35
    #15
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: bahston
    It seemed like a set back year to me this year for Studnicka, he looked a lot better in the bubble of 2020 then he did in his games this year at the wing. So i assumed they were working on his game at center Prov. to get him ready to go when there’s a spot. Although, they brought in another center at the deadline, so a little confused where they’re headed with him.

    Yeah would much prefer Lindholm to Hanifin but their GM seemed very confident about resigning him. Hanifin probably isn’t much of an improvement or what we need for that spot.

    There’s a purpose to going after a lindholm type. There’s no purpose to going after a hanifin type.

    As for studnicka, i thought he was playing great. Then he got hurt, and i think they thought it better to let him spend some time getting to speed in the AHL. But he’s played five games. It’s not like they sent him down to work on stuff.
    bahston a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 41
    #16
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    that Krejci deal.

    If by opening the window back up you mean assuring the rebuild will have good picks finishing bottom of the league, that contract will do it.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 43
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 38,705
    Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    I’ll give you rock solid number four. I’ve seen Calgary play plenty. I love watching the north division. Never know what’s going to happen it that gong show.


    Agree to disagree then. Hanifin has hands down been Calgary's best defense this year.
    20 avr. 2021 à 16 h 49
    #18
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Agree to disagree then. Hanifin has hands down been Calgary's best defense this year.


    If true, and i don’t think it is (for what it’s worth, he’s fourth in TOI. Not the be all end all, but still) then that’s a serious problem and probably why the flames aren’t making the playoffs. If a team can’t finish top four in the seven team north division with precisely zero good teams, they’re in trouble.
    20 avr. 2021 à 17 h 22
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 38,705
    Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    If true, and i don’t think it is (for what it’s worth, he’s fourth in TOI. Not the be all end all, but still) then that’s a serious problem and probably why the flames aren’t making the playoffs. If a team can’t finish top four in the seven team north division with precisely zero good teams, they’re in trouble.


    I dont entirely disagree with that assessment on the overall team, there are problems with the team.

    As for the ice time thing, 2 things. 1) Hanifin has lead the team all season in EV ice time, Ward never gave him special teams time. 2) Under Sutter Hanifin has the 3rd most minutes (4 less than Tanev and 13 more than Andersson) to me this indicates that Calgary has taken a lot more penalties than they have drawn since both Gio and Tanev play 1st PK where Hanifin is more of the 3rd PK unit guy
    20 avr. 2021 à 20 h 46
    #20
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 1,048
    Mentions "j'aime": 326
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    I dont entirely disagree with that assessment on the overall team, there are problems with the team.

    As for the ice time thing, 2 things. 1) Hanifin has lead the team all season in EV ice time, Ward never gave him special teams time. 2) Under Sutter Hanifin has the 3rd most minutes (4 less than Tanev and 13 more than Andersson) to me this indicates that Calgary has taken a lot more penalties than they have drawn since both Gio and Tanev play 1st PK where Hanifin is more of the 3rd PK unit guy


    Really don't see Calgary trading Hanafin. Giordano is nearing the end and with no high end replacement in sight they need him.
    20 avr. 2021 à 21 h 5
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 1,048
    Mentions "j'aime": 326
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    Yes on debrusk.

    Studnicka has to be in the NHL next year. Ditch Kase and ritchie if need be. They’ve played him at wing.

    The kids have grown. They’ve looked good. Let at least one of them play the left side. The way i see it you’ve made the left side very very very marginally better. If you were going to go get an actual good left d, i might look at it differently.



    There will be plenty of opportunity after the expansion draft in the and all the way to the next trade deadline for a LD. Just have to be ready to strike with cap room and tradeable assets to move when the chance presents itself. Lauzon is the keeper for me. Not pretty but doesn't shrink away when big boy hockey starts.
    20 avr. 2021 à 21 h 7
    #22
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: BruinsCharlies
    There will be plenty of opportunity after the expansion draft in the and all the way to the next trade deadline for a LD. Just have to be ready to strike with cap room and tradeable assets to move when the chance presents itself. Lauzon is the keeper for me. Not pretty but doesn't shrink away when big boy hockey starts.


    I think Seattle will agree
    20 avr. 2021 à 21 h 8
    #23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 1,048
    Mentions "j'aime": 326
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    I think Seattle will agree


    That's why Boston should protect him.
    20 avr. 2021 à 21 h 9
    #24
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: BruinsCharlies
    That's why Boston should protect him.


    Over carlo, grzelcyk, or mcavoy? That’s insanity.
    20 avr. 2021 à 21 h 36
    #25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 1,048
    Mentions "j'aime": 326
    Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
    Too much $$$ for Krejci and Rask. They need to be resigned, but on more team-friendly deals. I'd look for a more reliable 2nd/3rd line RW than Kase. I'm also willing to bet Lauzon or Zboril are taken over Clifton. Lastly, Beecher is returning to Michigan next year. But if he was to sign, it'd be for the rookie maximum, not minimum ($925K).


    It's the term for Krejci, not so much the $ although less is better. Still have to respect. A top tier NHL starter who still has it at 34. They get 6M, especially with only 2 year term.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage