SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

All In

Créé par: KingBurns
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 4 avr. 2021
Publié: 4 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
2750 000 $
46 000 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
36 000 000 $
1750 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
    Seattle
    ANA
    1. Burns, Brent
    2. Gambrell, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
    3. Jaros, Christian [Droits de RFA]
    4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
    2.
    SJS
    1. Järnkrok, Calle (1 000 000 $ retained)
    NSH
    1. Gregor, Noah [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
    3.
    BUF
    1. Donato, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
    5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $67 293 696 $0 $725 000 $14 206 304 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 050 000 $3 050 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    0 $0 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 6
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    796 667 $796 667 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    4 avr. 2021 à 20 h 10
    #1
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,091
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,835
    tenor.gif

    Trading three future first round picks
    palhal et Klara a aimé ceci.
    4 avr. 2021 à 20 h 10
    #2
    sensonfire
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 11,893
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
    Nashville declines.

    Buffalo takes that and runs.
    4 avr. 2021 à 20 h 12
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,878
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,573
    Quoting: sensonfire
    Nashville declines.

    Buffalo takes that and runs.


    I love Sam, but 3 lottery picks will do
    sabres89, palhal et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
    4 avr. 2021 à 20 h 15
    #4
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,739
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,776
    No way Seattle takes an 8m Burns and his term.
    Can't the Sharks just spend 6m on a winger, and keep their picks? Of course with Burns, you don't have a 6m to spend.
    4 avr. 2021 à 20 h 22
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    I love Sam, but 3 lottery picks will do


    I think this team makes the playoffs tho
    4 avr. 2021 à 20 h 22
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,878
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,573
    Quoting: KingBurns
    I think this team makes the playoffs tho


    Oh honey
    4 avr. 2021 à 20 h 23
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: palhal
    No way Seattle takes an 8m Burns and his term.
    Can't the Sharks just spend 6m on a winger, and keep their picks? Of course with Burns, you don't have a 6m to spend.


    He's still a solid contributor though.

    Gambrell is a young, middle 6 center and a 2nd in a draft that's expected to be great carries a lot of value.
    We could, but they wouldn't be as good as Olofsson or Reinhart.
    4 avr. 2021 à 20 h 25
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    Oh honey


    we're on the cusp of the playoffs now and this team is significantly better
    4 avr. 2021 à 20 h 51
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 4,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    I love Sam, but 3 lottery picks will do


    SIGN ME UP
    4 avr. 2021 à 20 h 51
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 4,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
    Quoting: KingBurns
    He's still a solid contributor though.

    Gambrell is a young, middle 6 center and a 2nd in a draft that's expected to be great carries a lot of value.
    We could, but they wouldn't be as good as Olofsson or Reinhart.


    burns is a burden at this point. 8 million until 40, one of the worst contracts in the league
    4 avr. 2021 à 21 h 28
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: OrganizedConfusion55
    burns is a burden at this point. 8 million until 40, one of the worst contracts in the league


    exactly, that's why we're compensating Seattle
    4 avr. 2021 à 21 h 30
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 4,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
    Quoting: KingBurns
    exactly, that's why we're compensating Seattle


    Not nearly enough for burns contract.

    Detroit got a 2nd for one year of Staal
    4 avr. 2021 à 21 h 41
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: OrganizedConfusion55
    Not nearly enough for burns contract.

    Detroit got a 2nd for one year of Staal


    Burns is a lot better than Staal
    4 avr. 2021 à 22 h 9
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 422
    Mentions "j'aime": 226
    Quoting: OrganizedConfusion55
    burns is a burden at this point. 8 million until 40, one of the worst contracts in the league

    It’s really not though. Guy still playing 25+ mins a night of quality two way hockey. If Burns is exposed, Seattle takes him probably for free because he puts butts in seats and gives you a face of your early franchise. Not really anyone else out there that they’d be able to build that roster around from that standpoint. That said, doubt DW puts his top pair workhorse out there for exposure, and assuredly doesn’t spend a bottom 6 center and 2nd rounder to do so.
    4 avr. 2021 à 22 h 29
    #15
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,739
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,776
    Quoting: SJS2212
    It’s really not though. Guy still playing 25+ mins a night of quality two way hockey. If Burns is exposed, Seattle takes him probably for free because he puts butts in seats and gives you a face of your early franchise. Not really anyone else out there that they’d be able to build that roster around from that standpoint. That said, doubt DW puts his top pair workhorse out there for exposure, and assuredly doesn’t spend a bottom 6 center and 2nd rounder to do so.


    Don't think you're looking reality. Maybe if Burns had a year left on his contract, Seattle would take but for four years that's debatable. Seattle isn't selecting the best player available from every team, gee they couldn't afford 31 5m players....a 150m cap hit.
    4 avr. 2021 à 23 h 18
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,536
    Mentions "j'aime": 618
    If Sabres do that other deal they might as well do the Burns deal too if you are trading Reinhart and Olofsson for picks then you might as well add Eichel and Ullmark to Hall and Montour and the Sabres wont get out of last place for 3-4 years anyways.
    5 avr. 2021 à 0 h 57
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 4,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
    Quoting: SJS2212
    It’s really not though. Guy still playing 25+ mins a night of quality two way hockey. If Burns is exposed, Seattle takes him probably for free because he puts butts in seats and gives you a face of your early franchise. Not really anyone else out there that they’d be able to build that roster around from that standpoint. That said, doubt DW puts his top pair workhorse out there for exposure, and assuredly doesn’t spend a bottom 6 center and 2nd rounder to do so.


    It really is. How many more years left? You're thinking of the now, not the future
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage