SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eichel package they COULD offer

Créé par: Jiannuccilli
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 22 mars 2021
Publié: 22 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
READ:

Before everyone freaks out on me, I understand that it’s unlikely Buffalo would ever send eichel to Boston without asking for one of McAvoy or pastrnak in return. I also understand that there’s teams outside the division who could probably offer a better package. I saw a report today that buffalo’s asking price would include at least 4 first round picks/players who were picked in the first round. I feel that this is a realistic offer that Boston could put on the table – probably not get accepted, but *IF* it did here’s what it could look like
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
33 650 000 $
2925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
27 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
1825 000 $
11 100 000 $
44 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Carlo, Brandon [Droits de RFA]
  2. DeBrusk, Jake
  3. Vaakanainen, Urho
  4. Vladar, Daniel
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  7. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  8. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de SJS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 254 841 $1 956 507 $57 500 $4 245 159 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 mars 2021 à 13 h 49
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 588
Mentions "j'aime": 278
Eichel starts with Mcavoy
TM11 a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 13 h 50
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Quoting: Oodz
Eichel starts with Mcavoy


I addressed that in the description. I should’ve included this but McAvoy for eichel is a non starter for Boston. They don’t even do that trade straight up so I tried to find a way they could work around it
22 mars 2021 à 13 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,767
Mentions "j'aime": 14,514
I think buffalo would rather give him away for free to a west coast team that trade him within the division.

No offense, this is not a good offer. Those will all be very late 1st rounders
22 mars 2021 à 13 h 59
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,526
Mentions "j'aime": 22,680
IMO, more than fair offer from Boston. From any team a lot of cap has to be returned to Buffalo in a trade
But what is with Larsson signing. Lot better value out there for under 4.5m
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 0
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,292
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Quoting: palhal
IMO, more than fair offer from Boston. From any team a lot of cap has to be returned to Buffalo in a trade
But what is with Larsson signing. Lot better value out there for under 4.5m


Buffalo needs a center coming back. It’s not close at all. Bruins don’t have enough.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 2
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I think buffalo would rather give him away for free to a west coast team that trade him within the division.

No offense, this is not a good offer. Those will all be very late 1st rounders


I don’t think it’s a bad offer but there’s a great chance it’s not as good as something New York or LA would offer. I think it’s the best the bruins can offer without giving up pastrnak or McAvoy (both they wouldn’t even trade 1 for 1 for eichel).

It’s probably 2 top 4 D with carlo and Vaak, potential #1 goalie in vladar, plus 3 firsts who you’ll get a good player at even if they’re late, Debrusk is probably the worst piece of the offer. I don’t think it’s bad, it’s just beatable by other teams.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 2
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,767
Mentions "j'aime": 14,514
Quoting: palhal
IMO, more than fair offer from Boston. From any team a lot of cap has to be returned to Buffalo in a trade
But what is with Larsson signing. Lot better value out there for under 4.5m


would you take this for Matthews?

thats what i thought.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 4
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,767
Mentions "j'aime": 14,514
Quoting: Jiannuccilli
I don’t think it’s a bad offer but there’s a great chance it’s not as good as something New York or LA would offer. I think it’s the best the bruins can offer without giving up pastrnak or McAvoy (both they wouldn’t even trade 1 for 1 for eichel).

It’s probably 2 top 4 D with carlo and Vaak, potential #1 goalie in vladar, plus 3 firsts who you’ll get a good player at even if they’re late, Debrusk is probably the worst piece of the offer. I don’t think it’s bad, it’s just beatable by other teams.


would you trade pastrnak for victor olofsson, henri jokiharju, Jake Mccabe, erik portillo and 5 buffalo 2nds (the difference between a boston 1st and buffalo 2nd is like 10 spots at most)

it just isn't a good offer and buffalo already would be unwilling to trade him to boston.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 6
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Quoting: palhal
IMO, more than fair offer from Boston. From any team a lot of cap has to be returned to Buffalo in a trade
But what is with Larsson signing. Lot better value out there for under 4.5m


Like who? I scrolled through the UFAs and I felt that the most realistic solid Dman who will hit the market that the bruins can afford. I might’ve missed someone though so let me know who you have in mind
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 7
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,526
Mentions "j'aime": 22,680
Quoting: Sabres923
Buffalo needs a center coming back. It’s not close at all. Bruins don’t have enough.


But the Sabres would have additional cap to acquire a centre

Seems like Sabres fans think they are going to equal on ice value for Eichel, plus cap and prospects plus picks. The idea of trading Eichel is gain cap space and young assets for yet another rebuild. If not the option is keep Eichel for the next four plus year, keeping missing the play offs and then have him leave as UFA.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 8
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Am I the only Bruins fan that is trying to tell people that we NEED to rebuild? Am I just stupid? Do we not have to? The Bruins core aren't getting any younger, the only defenseman we have for the future is McAvoy, and there is absolutely no forwards for the future either, Studnicka isn't going to be that good, face it.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 9
#12
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,526
Mentions "j'aime": 22,680
Quoting: Jiannuccilli
Like who? I scrolled through the UFAs and I felt that the most realistic solid Dman who will hit the market that the bruins can afford. I might’ve missed someone though so let me know who you have in mind


Larsson is just a middling Dman....so 2.5m might be his max. There might be trade options available as teams might have to expose an NHL Dman and might want to do a trade with Bruins instead.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 9
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,767
Mentions "j'aime": 14,514
Quoting: Jiannuccilli
I addressed that in the description. I should’ve included this but McAvoy for eichel is a non starter for Boston. They don’t even do that trade straight up so I tried to find a way they could work around it


If you are suggesting you wouldn't trade mcavoy for eichel 1 for 1 I dont think this will be a productive post and I question whether this was done in good faith or with a straight face.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 10
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Quoting: kiiel
Am I the only Bruins fan that is trying to tell people that we NEED to rebuild? Am I just stupid? Do we not have to? The Bruins core aren't getting any younger, the only defenseman we have for the future is McAvoy, and there is absolutely no forwards for the future either, Studnicka isn't going to be that good, face it.


They won’t need to full on rebuild for another 3-5 years. Anyway, eichel is a piece that could help them win now and would also be a good centerpiece to rebuild around when that time comes. They would still have a strong core of Eichel, Pastrnak McAvoy
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 11
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,292
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Quoting: palhal
But the Sabres would have additional cap to acquire a centre

Seems like Sabres fans think they are going to equal on ice value for Eichel, plus cap and prospects plus picks. The idea of trading Eichel is gain cap space and young assets for yet another rebuild. If not the option is keep Eichel for the next four plus year, keeping missing the play offs and then have him leave as UFA.

He still has 5 more years left on his contract.. Obviously they aren’t going to win the trade, because there’s not a lot of players that are better than Jack. For example Vegas could offer a trade package.
Stephenson
Tuch
Krebs
1&3rd is a good offer. Two established players on good long term contracts and a promising center prospect.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 12
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
If you are suggesting you wouldn't trade mcavoy for eichel 1 for 1 I dont think this will be a productive post and I question whether this was done in good faith or with a straight face.


They seriously would not do that. Ask anyone who watches or knows anything about the bruins. McAvoy is a legit franchise cornerstone number one right handed defenseman who’s in the running for Norris already. That’s harder to find than a 1C. Similar to why Colorado wouldn’t give Makar straight up for eichel
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 12
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,767
Mentions "j'aime": 14,514
Quoting: palhal
But the Sabres would have additional cap to acquire a centre

Seems like Sabres fans think they are going to equal on ice value for Eichel, plus cap and prospects plus picks. The idea of trading Eichel is gain cap space and young assets for yet another rebuild. If not the option is keep Eichel for the next four plus year, keeping missing the play offs and then have him leave as UFA.


no, but there should be atleast one elite asset coming back, whether that be a very good young player on his ELC, preferably a center, or a top 5 draft pick.

Also, counting this year he is under contract for 6 years and his NTC doesn't factor in until after the 21-22 season.

Jack Eichel being available for trade without any movement restrictions would be a situation the NHL hasn't seen in some time. An unquestioned elite center under 25 under contract for 5 years.

The idea that the best you can do is this is not credible.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 13
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Quoting: palhal
Larsson is just a middling Dman....so 2.5m might be his max. There might be trade options available as teams might have to expose an NHL Dman and might want to do a trade with Bruins instead.


He’s already making over 4mil and believe it or not he’s actually gotten better since that contract was signed. He’ll get a lot more than 2.5 on the open market
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 14
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,767
Mentions "j'aime": 14,514
Quoting: Jiannuccilli
They seriously would not do that. Ask anyone who watches or knows anything about the bruins. McAvoy is a legit franchise cornerstone number one right handed defenseman who’s in the running for Norris already. That’s harder to find than a 1C. Similar to why Colorado wouldn’t give Makar straight up for eichel


then stop making eichel trades. its insulting.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 17
#20
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,526
Mentions "j'aime": 22,680
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
would you take this for Matthews?

thats what i thought.


What a silly comparison. The Leafs right now are in win mode...and that include Matthews. If you haven't noticed, the Sabres are dreadful even with Eichel. IMO the Sabres wouldn't get a better offer than the one posted. Keep Eichel for the next four plus year and continue not to make playoffs lose him for nothing. Of course the Bruins would be better not making this trade for Eichel. They should keep their prospects and their picks, give away Debrusk, keep Carlo and then spend 6m on good UFA centre
That's Sabres competition is a trade. Teams can spend just $$$$ on UFA and keep their picks.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 20
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,767
Mentions "j'aime": 14,514
Quoting: palhal
What a silly comparison. The Leafs right now are in win mode...and that include Matthews. If you haven't noticed, the Sabres are dreadful even with Eichel. IMO the Sabres wouldn't get a better offer than the one posted. Keep Eichel for the next four plus year and continue not to make playoffs lose him for nothing. Of course the Bruins would be better not making this trade for Eichel. They should keep their prospects and their picks, give away Debrusk, keep Carlo and then spend 6m on good UFA centre
That's Sabres competition is a trade. Teams can spend just $$$$ on UFA and keep their picks.


that is fine. Eichel is in the prime of his career, under contract for 5 more years. if buffalo made him available for trade they would get a dozen better offers.

funny the team with 2 11 million dollar centers thinks building your roster for balance and depth is the way to go.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 22
#22
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,526
Mentions "j'aime": 22,680
Quoting: Sabres923
He still has 5 more years left on his contract.. Obviously they aren’t going to win the trade, because there’s not a lot of players that are better than Jack. For example Vegas could offer a trade package.
Stephenson
Tuch
Krebs
1&3rd is a good offer. Two established players on good long term contracts and a promising center prospect.


That's a fair offer. The only issue is whether Vegas can handle the 5.2m more Eichel makes than Tuch. Vegas was somewhat cap strapped this season but got LTIR relief. May not be as fortunate next season.
Sabres923 a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 26
#23
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,526
Mentions "j'aime": 22,680
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
that is fine. Eichel is in the prime of his career, under contract for 5 more years. if buffalo made him available for trade they would get a dozen better offers.

funny the team with 2 11 million dollar centers thinks building your roster for balance and depth is the way to go.


Funny the team with a 9m and 8m LWer and a 6m RW....totalling 5 goals should be YOUR blue print of how to build a team
22 mars 2021 à 14 h 30
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,579
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Quoting: Oodz
Eichel starts with Mcavoy


It starts and ends*. Bruins wouldn't do it though.
22 mars 2021 à 15 h 11
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 588
Mentions "j'aime": 278
Quoting: bhavikp27
It starts and ends*. Bruins wouldn't do it though.


U wouldn’t want Eichel instead of mcavoy?

What about mcavoy in a package for Matthews
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage