SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Burakovsky Taken by Seattle

Créé par: Anus_McLeod
Équipe: 2021-22 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 18 mars 2021
Publié: 18 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Avs protect 8 skaters because Johnson isn't asked to or doesn't agree to waive his NMC. MacKinnon, Landeskog, Rantanen, Kadri, Makar, Girard, Toews, and Johnson is the protected list.

Toews will not end up in Seattle. There is just no way. He leads the team in TOI, and is extremely valuable. He'll be protected in any scenario, and so will Makar and Girard.

Burakovsky is good, and I'd hate to lose him, but I think they can replace him if they absolutely have to. I have Tatar in the below, but Iafallo is another UFA that could work, as are Hoffman, Danault, or Palmieri. A trade is a possibility as well.

Personally I think Johnson waives his contractual NMC in exchange for a handshake NMC and this is all moot, but just throwing the scenario out there.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 250 000 $
36 850 000 $
31 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 500 000 $
77 000 000 $
54 850 000 $
34 850 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
    Seattle
    2.
    COL
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (OTT)
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    2022
    Logo de COL
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    2023
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $81 583 963 $1 741 463 $2 700 000 $-83 963 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 850 000 $6 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    798 333 $798 333 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 21
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,896
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,580
    Landeskog is a UFA, just wait to sign him until after the draft. His agent can always tell Seattle he won't sign with them and then he'd be a UFA July 1 free to resign with Colorado
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 25
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    Landeskog is a UFA, just wait to sign him until after the draft. His agent can always tell Seattle he won't sign with them and then he'd be a UFA July 1 free to resign with Colorado


    no..you dont do th at. You do not play chicken with your captain and arguable one of your most important fwds. Do not let him get to the legal tampering period. Big name UFAs who get that point do not come back and sign with their teams.

    Its an unnecessary risk
    TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 26
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    Landeskog is a UFA, just wait to sign him until after the draft. His agent can always tell Seattle he won't sign with them and then he'd be a UFA July 1 free to resign with Colorado


    It's certainly a possibility. This is meant to illustrate the worst case scenario. If they do that though then Seattle takes Graves and Sakic needs to figure out how to move one of Compher or Donskoi so he can re-sign Saad.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 27
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 1,736
    Mentions "j'aime": 469
    All of the takes with the Rangers re-acquiring Ryan Graves crack me up. Tony D has a better chance of playing for the Rangers again.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 31
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,896
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,580
    Quoting: coga16
    no..you dont do th at. You do not play chicken with your captain and arguable one of your most important fwds. Do not let him get to the legal tampering period. Big name UFAs who get that point do not come back and sign with their teams.

    Its an unnecessary risk


    you can agree to a deal verbally, just dont sign it. if you don't trust him then what are you doing?
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 32
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    you can agree to a deal verbally, just dont sign it. if you don't trust him then what are you doing?


    if you have a deal in place, just sign it, dont mess around. Seattle could offer him 2-3m more than the Avs and tempt things.
    Its just wreckless approach to a stately cup teams window, you dont take unnecessary chances.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 33
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,896
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,580
    Quoting: coga16
    if you have a deal in place, just sign it, dont mess around. Seattle could offer him 2-3m more than the Avs and tempt things.
    Its just wreckless approach to a stately cup teams window, you dont take unnecessary chances.


    so you don't trust your team captain. if he was interested in hearing that stuff, he would wait until the tampering period to sign anyways.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 34
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
    Quoting: BSpadaro83
    All of the takes with the Rangers re-acquiring Ryan Graves crack me up. Tony D has a better chance of playing for the Rangers again.


    Why? Seems like they could use a good LHD. Hajek might be okay, but it seems like an area they can upgrade. What am I missing?
    TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 35
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    so you don't trust your team captain. if he was interested in hearing that stuff, he would wait until the tampering period to sign anyways.


    Thats his agents job to get him the best deal possible,
    This is a business, if Seattle came in and offered him 9m aav, you dont think they go back to the Avs and ask them if they can increase their price.

    Its just a dumb idea to let him go to tampering
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 36
    #10
    exo2769
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 15,683
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,837
    Seattle is taking one of the Dmen. Even if EJ waives...it'll be graves. Otherwise it could be one of Graves, Girard, or Toews if EJ doesn't want to waive.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 38
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 1,736
    Mentions "j'aime": 469
    Quoting: Anus_McLeod
    Why? Seems like they could use a good LHD. Hajek might be okay, but it seems like an area they can upgrade. What am I missing?


    GM pride. Not gonna sell a guy for peanuts you gave up, watch him bloom somewhere else (which may just be the perfect situation to over value him a ton) and then pay real assets to bring him back, especially knowing the player knows your org and knows you gave up on him. Just not a realistic scenario.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 42
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
    Quoting: BSpadaro83
    GM pride. Not gonna sell a guy for peanuts you gave up, watch him bloom somewhere else (which may just be the perfect situation to over value him a ton) and then pay real assets to bring him back, especially knowing the player knows your org and knows you gave up on him. Just not a realistic scenario.


    I would hope GM decisions are made with more consideration to the future, but you could be right. Someone will take him though, no doubt. Rangers were a low hanging fruit in this acgm, which was more about illustrating the loss of Burakovsky.
    BSpadaro83 a aimé ceci.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 44
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
    Quoting: exo2769
    Seattle is taking one of the Dmen. Even if EJ waives...it'll be graves. Otherwise it could be one of Graves, Girard, or Toews if EJ doesn't want to waive.


    There is no chance Girard will be available. I'd be thrilled if they opt for Graves over Burakovsky, as Colorado has plenty of LHD to absorb that loss. I don't see it that way though.
    exo2769 a aimé ceci.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 45
    #14
    John 3 16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 9,582
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
    Quoting: coga16
    no..you dont do th at. You do not play chicken with your captain and arguable one of your most important fwds. Do not let him get to the legal tampering period. Big name UFAs who get that point do not come back and sign with their teams.

    Its an unnecessary risk


    This. Do not give Seattle the opportunity to float $10m in front of Landeskog. They can easily afford to overpay on him and he'd be a perfect captain for an expansion franchise. Not worth the risk.
    exo2769, coga16 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 49
    #15
    retired
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 8,893
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
    interesting idea. i think id just trade or buyout johnson before exposing bura but bura is replaceable. maybe seattle will take compher too if the avs agree to let them take bura.

    hate the saad contract. 5 years is way to long. not a fan of tatar either. but there are always a few good free agent options.

    not a big fan of bridging makar but he and his agent may choose that route.
    Anus_McLeod et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 51
    #16
    retired
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 8,893
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
    Quoting: exo2769
    Seattle is taking one of the Dmen. Even if EJ waives...it'll be graves. Otherwise it could be one of Graves, Girard, or Toews if EJ doesn't want to waive.


    with the way graves is playing i could see them passing and just taking nuke or jost instead.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 51
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: exo2769
    Seattle is taking one of the Dmen. Even if EJ waives...it'll be graves. Otherwise it could be one of Graves, Girard, or Toews if EJ doesn't want to waive.


    girard makar and Toews arent going anywhere, you can put a pin in that
    exo2769 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 53
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
    Quoting: DirtyDangle
    interesting idea. i think id just trade or buyout johnson before exposing bura but bura is replaceable. maybe seattle will take compher too if the avs agree to let them take bura.

    hate the saad contract. 5 years is way to long. not a fan of tatar either. but there are always a few good free agent options.

    not a big fan of bridging makar but he and his agent may choose that route.


    All fair points. I hate the EJ buyout, as that means paying him when MacKinnon is due for his raise and when Makar is due his after the bridge (not to mention Byram and others). Just losing Bura is arguably more appealing than the buyout.
    18 mars 2021 à 12 h 57
    #19
    retired
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 8,893
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
    Quoting: Anus_McLeod
    All fair points. I hate the EJ buyout, as that means paying him when MacKinnon is due for his raise and when Makar is due his after the bridge (not to mention Byram and others). Just losing Bura is arguably more appealing than the buyout.


    then you're still stuck with johnsons contract for the next few years. neither option is that appealing. ideally the avs can trade him with a pick.
    18 mars 2021 à 13 h 6
    #20
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
    Quoting: DirtyDangle
    then you're still stuck with johnsons contract for the next few years. neither option is that appealing. ideally the avs can trade him with a pick.


    It's just two more years, meaning he's completely off the books when MacKinnon gets his raise. I think that's a big factor. Trading even with max retention and a sweetener is preferable to the buyout.
    DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
    18 mars 2021 à 13 h 18
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,896
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,580
    Quoting: Richard88
    This. Do not give Seattle the opportunity to float $10m in front of Landeskog. They can easily afford to overpay on him and he'd be a perfect captain for an expansion franchise. Not worth the risk.


    If he was interested in seeing what was out there he would simply not sign before the draft anyways
    18 mars 2021 à 13 h 18
    #22
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,188
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
    Quoting: exo2769
    Seattle is taking one of the Dmen. Even if EJ waives...it'll be graves. Otherwise it could be one of Graves, Girard, or Toews if EJ doesn't want to waive.


    If he doesn't want to waive, I think they'd buy him out before exposing Girard or Toews lol.
    exo2769 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    18 mars 2021 à 14 h 45
    #23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 9,609
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,587
    Trade or buy out happens with EJ before this if he doesn't waive. Colorado are trying to build a rep of being decent to their players but there's only so far it can be pushed and in those circumstances that's what happens. This doesn't.
    18 mars 2021 à 15 h 18
    #24
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
    Quoting: TJTwolf
    Trade or buy out happens with EJ before this if he doesn't waive. Colorado are trying to build a rep of being decent to their players but there's only so far it can be pushed and in those circumstances that's what happens. This doesn't.


    I would be legitimately shocked if they bought him out. That's no good for anyone, as that $2M really hurts and it isn't doing right by a guy who has been loyal to the organization.

    If you think about it as adding $2M to Burakovsky's salary it kinda hits home a bit. Would you sign Bura for $6.9M (possibly more when his deal is up)? That's kinda what's happening in a sense.

    I do get your point of view on this, but I really fear the repercussions outweigh the benefits, especially if the team can just sign Iafallo or someone to replace Burky. I also think Johnson waives though and we don't need to worry about it.
    TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    18 mars 2021 à 15 h 46
    #25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 9,609
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,587
    Quoting: Anus_McLeod
    I would be legitimately shocked if they bought him out. That's no good for anyone, as that $2M really hurts and it isn't doing right by a guy who has been loyal to the organization.

    If you think about it as adding $2M to Burakovsky's salary it kinda hits home a bit. Would you sign Bura for $6.9M (possibly more when his deal is up)? That's kinda what's happening in a sense.

    I do get your point of view on this, but I really fear the repercussions outweigh the benefits, especially if the team can just sign Iafallo or someone to replace Burky. I also think Johnson waives though and we don't need to worry about it.


    As I said they're trying to build that rep but it IS a business and EJ knows that. I also think that's why he waives because if he can play on after the big cap hit he will likely want to finish with the Avs and maybe take a small salary to be a 'mentor' for a while.

    Burakovsky at 7 is likely about the money imo going forward if it's a long term deal and they decide to re-sign him.
    Anus_McLeod et DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage