I'm the first looking to find a place to move Erikison but this trade aint it.

I'm not paying 6 million to Burns for the next 5 years at the age of 35 to 40!!! Let alone giving up a 1st overall and 3 young players to get that. Sorry nope I'd rather keep Erikson and have him dabble in our bottom 6 for this year and next.

There is no way wild, or any other team are trading for Logan C, & his Contract. Wild rather keep Victor rask, & his Contract.

Sharks would have to pay someone to take on his contract with NMC, yearly AAV, & how many years with his age. Wild GM doesn't want any long term contract like this

Couture is worth his contract now but for how much longer best guess is the last 5 years of the contract will be rough. The Wild are more than a top center away from contending so I don't think he is a fit in Minnesota.

Wild and Nucks both decline. Huge overpays for massive salaries.

Vancouver isn't touching Burns's contract even with retention

The Wild aren't at the point in their timeline where it makes any sense to do this.

Hard no. Wild won’t do that. They’ll ride out rask or buy him out this summer and sign denault. Couture is not a move they’d make. Especially with that term, oof

Nice of you to consider Couture a top center. I don't think that about him at all and I'm a Sharks fan.

Check Wild center depth and you will understand. Top center is relative I guess.