SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next years roster options moving on from Krejci

Créé par: AgentWebster
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 24 janv. 2021
Publié: 24 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I like David but if I could bring in a younger center like RNH then we gotta move on. For the people that want to keep him the only way I see it is if we shipped Kase for draft picks and moved Coyle up to the 2nd line RW and played David on the 3rd line.


This also leaves us with 3 Million in cap space.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
44 000 000 $
3925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
21 750 000 $
63 000 000 $
68 000 000 $
68 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (DET)
DET
  1. Moore, John
Détails additionnels:
Or any team for a late round pick
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Smith, Craig
Détails additionnels:
Clearing room and to any team for a 2nd or 3rd
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de CAR
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $79 424 008 $1 956 507 $557 500 $2 075 992 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 janv. 2021 à 12 h 32
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
A few things:

1. Tuukka for 5 years? come on
2. Krejci is gonna be cheaper than RNH by a bit so might as well stick with him until he shows signs of slowing down.
3. Carlo for 4 years is a problem, either another bridge to take him to 26 years old or you lock him up... (6 or 7 years at 5-5.5 million)
4. It depends on this year obviously but Hall isnt gonna be that cheap. Also bruins probably dont want him (you are screwed trying to resign McAvoy, Studnicka, Debrusk, etc...)
5. What is the point in bringing in Oleksiak? Zboril and Lauzon are doing just fine
6. Not gonna trade away Smith after 1 year after they just signed him lol
7. Ritchie die?
8. No Taxi Squad next year (im guessing you meant to just scratch them)

And now for my opinion (take it or leave it lol):
1. Brian Elliot is unnecessary. could just use Vladar

but yeah points 1-8 r just things you gotta work on / fix up lol
bhavikp27, Gofnut999 et AgentWebster a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2021 à 12 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,872
Mentions "j'aime": 8,871
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
A few things:

1. Tuukka for 5 years? come on
2. Krejci is gonna be cheaper than RNH by a bit so might as well stick with him until he shows signs of slowing down.
3. Carlo for 4 years is a problem, either another bridge to take him to 26 years old or you lock him up... (6 or 7 years at 5-5.5 million)
4. It depends on this year obviously but Hall isnt gonna be that cheap. Also bruins probably dont want him (you are screwed trying to resign McAvoy, Studnicka, Debrusk, etc...)
5. What is the point in bringing in Oleksiak? Zboril and Lauzon are doing just fine
6. Not gonna trade away Smith after 1 year after they just signed him lol
7. Ritchie die?
8. No Taxi Squad next year (im guessing you meant to just scratch them)

And now for my opinion:
1. Brian Elliot is unnecessary. could just use Vladar



Good takes.

Additiion. Kase - my guess us they move on from him. Tying him to long term significant $ with his concussion history is not a good idea. I see him being exposed to Seattle if he is not traded.
AgentWebster a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2021 à 12 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,048
Mentions "j'aime": 326
1. the 3M in cap space is eaten by McAvoy with Debrusk, Studnicka, Zboril and Lauzon needing new deals.

2. Carlo will cost you at least 5M.

3. Crazy to pay Kase who hasn't produced and is concussion prone.

4. Oleksiak is redundant with the young d you already have and 6 Years? Ask San Jose how that's worked out for them.

5. If you sign Hall how are you going to pay Pastrnak?

6. Would rather pay Krejci around 4M for a year or two and then replace him with entry level draft pick then give RNH 8M and too much term.

7. Not trading Smith who seems to already be a good fit for as a right wing playing with Coyle as his centre.
.
24 janv. 2021 à 12 h 49
#4
Démarrer sujet
AgentWebster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 367
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
A few things:

1. Tuukka for 5 years? come on
2. Krejci is gonna be cheaper than RNH by a bit so might as well stick with him until he shows signs of slowing down.
3. Carlo for 4 years is a problem, either another bridge to take him to 26 years old or you lock him up... (6 or 7 years at 5-5.5 million)
4. It depends on this year obviously but Hall isnt gonna be that cheap. Also bruins probably dont want him (you are screwed trying to resign McAvoy, Studnicka, Debrusk, etc...)
5. What is the point in bringing in Oleksiak? Zboril and Lauzon are doing just fine
6. Not gonna trade away Smith after 1 year after they just signed him lol
7. Ritchie die?
8. No Taxi Squad next year (im guessing you meant to just scratch them)

And now for my opinion (take it or leave it lol):
1. Brian Elliot is unnecessary. could just use Vladar

but yeah points 1-8 r just things you gotta work on / fix up lol




That's for the input.

1. Tuukka would be 38 when this deal would be done so yeah come on lets do it!!!
2. Yes I did think about that but for how long and you missed out on the next C for the next 6 years because you wanted to hold on.
3. I like the idea of locking him up so I think your right on that end.
4. I also say you never know unless you make the offer and you never know where a players head is at. Maybe he does take less to be with an org. like the Bruins.
5. I really like his size and he plays bottom 6 mins but could see him moving up to the top 4 so for that money yes good deal but could we just rock with Zboril and Lauzon yes. It's worth a relook on my end.
6. I like Smith hard working ect but his deal just did not work in this lineup.
7. Completely forgot about Ritchiescream What do you think of a 4th line Ritchie, Frederic, and Wags? If I bring in Ritchie then Bjork has got to go.
8. Yes overlooked that.
9. I did have him in then said I want someone with playoff experience but your right I could put him in.
24 janv. 2021 à 12 h 54
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: AgentWebster
That's for the input.

1. Tuukka would be 38 when this deal would be done so yeah come on lets do it!!!
2. Yes I did think about that but for how long and you missed out on the next C for the next 6 years because you wanted to hold on.
3. I like the idea of locking him up so I think your right on that end.
4. I also say you never know unless you make the offer and you never know where a players head is at. Maybe he does take less to be with an org. like the Bruins.
5. I really like his size and he plays bottom 6 mins but could see him moving up to the top 4 so for that money yes good deal but could we just rock with Zboril and Lauzon yes. It's worth a relook on my end.
6. I like Smith hard working ect but his deal just did not work in this lineup.
7. Completely forgot about Ritchiescream What do you think of a 4th line Ritchie, Frederic, and Wags? If I bring in Ritchie then Bjork has got to go.
8. Yes overlooked that.
9. I did have him in then said I want someone with playoff experience but your right I could put him in.


Very good in depth replies! A lot of it is truly hard no doubt. I personally didnt like the Smith signing because like you said "his deal just did not work in this lineup". It didnt make sense to me either but with it being done it seems we cant just go and undo it lol (we shall see how he does smile )
There is a lot of interesting stuff like their LHD depth, Urho needing to play also and now fighting Zboril and Lauzon for a spot (damn shame after Zboril FINALLY cracked the roster)

IDK man but you seem to know your stuff those were just some of the things I saw

Quoting: Gofnut999
Good takes.

Additiion. Kase - my guess us they move on from him. Tying him to long term significant $ with his concussion history is not a good idea. I see him being exposed to Seattle if he is not traded.


And yeah the Kase thing is really tough which is why I didnt say it in either place. Who knows. I think its time to move on but maybe they disagree
24 janv. 2021 à 13 h 7
#6
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,974
Mentions "j'aime": 5,381
Wings are out on this
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage