SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next game assuming Robertson is ok

Créé par: leafs101
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 16 janv. 2021
Publié: 16 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
everyone keeps pushing for Lehtonen but I'd like to get a look at Sandin as well.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $80 940 575 $0 $0 $559 425 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
874 125 $874 125 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 18
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 5,304
He's not.
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 491
Keefe said he's out for a while
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 20
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,765
Mentions "j'aime": 31,478




He'll be out for a while
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 20
#4
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,593
Mentions "j'aime": 21,142
I knew this was gonna happen. Honestly should have put Boyd or kept Barabanov in
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 24
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,209
Mentions "j'aime": 5,209
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
He's not.


Quoting: justaBoss




He'll be out for a while


Quoting: PrimeDatsyuk
Keefe said he's out for a while


damn that sucks
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 32
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 860
Mentions "j'aime": 264
bye bye aaron dell
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 41
#7
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Without waiving Dell the Leafs' options for emergency recall would be Brooks and Boyd from the taxi squad or someone like Joey Anderson. Barabanov cannot go back in.
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 42
#8
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Miles_Togo
Without waiving Dell the Leafs' options for emergency recall would be Brooks and Boyd from the taxi squad or someone like Joey Anderson. Barabanov cannot go back in.


Ltir...
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 45
#9
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Quoting: Jamiepo
Ltir...


Putting him on LTIR would give them: $821,667 (as they would lose the 650K of cap space they have when they put him on LTIR - and therefore LTIR makes no sense, but even if they did it would be...) essentially the exact same thing as using emergency recall and they still wouldn't be able to bring Barabanov back up without waiving Dell.
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 48
#10
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Miles_Togo
Putting him on LTIR would give them: $821,667 so essentially the exact same thing as using emergency recall and they will wouldn't be able to bring Barabanov back up without waiving Dell.


Ltir would put them directly back to where they were before Robertson got hurt. Leafs will use Ltir most likely... depending on injury. Leafs can not use emergency call up until they start a game with 19 players dressed due to cap space, meaning dell would already need to be waived. Which would mean they could still ice 20 players.
16 janv. 2021 à 23 h 57
#11
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Modifié 17 janv. 2021 à 0 h 4
Quoting: Jamiepo
Ltir would put them directly back to where they were before Robertson got hurt.


It will not. Not at all. To get full cap relief when placing a player on LTIR you need to be as close to the cap as possible. The Leafs' are not and it would be near impossible for them for them to get closer before they would put Robertson on LTIR. According to capfriendly the Leafs' have $668,201 in cap space. Robertson has a cap of $821,667. If they put Robertson on LTIR they don't have: $668,201 + $821,667 in cap space (which would be the case if he could send him back down), they would have $821,667 in cap space - losing the $668,201 they currently have.

Quote:
Leafs will use Ltir most likely... depending on injury. Leafs can not use emergency call up until they start a game with 19 players due to cap space, meaning dell would already need to be waived.


Under the new MOU you do not need to play a game with 19 players before you can use emergency recalls (although the MOU was not completely clear that if applied to all circumstances, and because this has nothing to do with covid they may need to play a game with 19)
17 janv. 2021 à 0 h 33
#12
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Modifié 17 janv. 2021 à 0 h 41
Quoting: Miles_Togo
It will not. Not at all. To get full cap relief when placing a player on LTIR you need to be as close to the cap as possible. The Leafs' are not and it would be near impossible for them for them to get closer before they would put Robertson on LTIR. According to capfriendly the Leafs' have $668,201 in cap space. Robertson has a cap of $821,667. If they put Robertson on LTIR they don't have: $668,201 + $821,667 in cap space (which would be the case if he could send him back down), they would have $821,667 in cap space - losing the $668,201 they currently have.

Quote:
Leafs will use Ltir most likely... depending on injury. Leafs can not use emergency call up until they start a game with 19 players due to cap space, meaning dell would already need to be waived.


Under the new MOU you do not need to play a game with 19 players before you can use emergency recalls (although the MOU was not completely clear that if applied to all circumstances, and because this has nothing to do with covid they may need to play a game with 19)


Been over this with others... no the mou had nothing to do with this. In fact I think it was with you so please don’t make me post cba in here.

Leafs do not need to include Robertson when setting the ACSL... I believe but I will need to look into that. The other thing you are missing is that it is not the cap hit you see here but their averaged cap hit to set ACSL.
17 janv. 2021 à 10 h 18
#13
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Quoting: Jamiepo
Been over this with others... no the mou had nothing to do with this. In fact I think it was with you so please don’t make me post cba in here.


As Chris Johnston just said minutes ago: You are wrong. It is on page 19 and 20 (item 61) of the 2020/21 Transition Rules.

Quote:
Leafs do not need to include Robertson when setting the ACSL... I believe but I will need to look into that. The other thing you are missing is that it is not the cap hit you see here but their averaged cap hit to set ACSL.


Robertson cannot be removed from the roster and can only go to IR or LTIR. Either way he must be used for setting the ACSL. Your last point is irrelevant to the fact that they would have $821,667 in cap space if they put Robertson on LTIR and they will not go that route.
17 janv. 2021 à 10 h 33
#14
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Modifié 17 janv. 2021 à 10 h 54
Quoting: Miles_Togo
As Chris Johnston just said minutes ago: You are wrong. It is on page 19 and 20 (item 61) of the 2020/21 Transition Rules.

Quote:
Leafs do not need to include Robertson when setting the ACSL... I believe but I will need to look into that. The other thing you are missing is that it is not the cap hit you see here but their averaged cap hit to set ACSL.


Robertson cannot be removed from the roster and can only go to IR or LTIR. Either way he must be used for setting the ACSL. Your last point is irrelevant to the fact that they would have $821,667 in cap space if they put Robertson on LTIR and they will not go that route.


Still looking into it but where are you reading this? Item 61 is not on page 19 or 20 and has nothing to do with emergency call ups?

I am still trying to find something anywhere that would allow a team with 20 players on the roster use an emergency call up to bring in a 21st player. Nothing in the mou or cba.
17 janv. 2021 à 10 h 54
#15
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Quoting: Jamiepo
Still looking into it but where are you reading this? Item 61 is not on page 19 or 20 and has nothing to do with emergency call ups?


2020/21 Transition Rules
17 janv. 2021 à 11 h 5
#16
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Jamiepo
Robertson cannot be removed from the roster and can only go to IR or LTIR. Either way he must be used for setting the ACSL. Your last point is irrelevant to the fact that they would have $821,667 in cap space if they put Robertson on LTIR and they will not go that route.


Still looking into it but where are you reading this? Item 61 is not on page 19 or 20 and has nothing to do with emergency call ups?[/quote]

If Robertson is moved to ltir and replaced to set the ACSL like opening roster then no they would not need to include his salary to set the ACSL. I’m not sure if that is possible in season though.
17 janv. 2021 à 11 h 6
#17
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Modifié 17 janv. 2021 à 11 h 43
Quoting: Miles_Togo


Yup, I found that just before you posted it but thank you. Sections 61 says specifically due to covid protocol.

All the of language in section 50.10e says 18-2 specifically but says nothing about 18-3. So technically they might not need to waive dell to envoys this but would need to play 1 player short. But pridham might know more loopholes than a dummy like me thumbing through the cba.

Seen a lot of insiders (not Johnston so much) be dead wrong or right for the wrong reasons.
17 janv. 2021 à 11 h 42
#18
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Quoting: Jamiepo
Yup, I found that just before you posted it but thank you. Sections 61 says specifically due to covid protocol.


Yes, I said that in post 11. However, there is debate over how expansive the covid protocol is. Robertson's knee injury is going to keep him out for a bit, but that timeline will not be assessed until after an MRI. The MRI that Robertson requires possibly qualifies under the covid protocol, and not allowing such a procedure to be covered under the covid protocol would put all players at additional risk.
17 janv. 2021 à 11 h 47
#19
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Miles_Togo
Yes, I said that in post 11. However, there is debate over how expansive the covid protocol is. Robertson's knee injury is going to keep him out for a bit, but that timeline will not be assessed until after an MRI. The MRI that Robertson requires possibly qualifies under the covid protocol, and not allowing such a procedure to be covered under the covid protocol would put all players at additional risk.


LOL.., loopholes. Could definitely see the leafs pulling this ****. It’s clearly just abuse of the cba.

But in reality starting a game with 11 forwards would not be the end of the world either. The loophole that I like here is no mention of 20 player roster just 18 and 2 meaning that 17-3 would make them eligible for emergency call up.
Miles_Togo a aimé ceci.
17 janv. 2021 à 12 h 11
#20
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Quoting: Jamiepo
LOL.., loopholes. Could definitely see the leafs pulling this ****. It’s clearly just abuse of the cba.

But in reality starting a game with 11 forwards would not be the end of the world either. The loophole that I like here is no mention of 20 player roster just 18 and 2 meaning that 17-3 would make them eligible for emergency call up.


The waiving of Dell and Spezza would indicate that they are trying to get closer to the cap before putting Robertson on LTIR. (In this case I would assume they are bringing up Engvall and one of Barabanov or Lehtonen to get 500K closer to the cap).
17 janv. 2021 à 12 h 45
#21
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Miles_Togo
The waiving of Dell and Spezza would indicate that they are trying to get closer to the cap before putting Robertson on LTIR. (In this case I would assume they are bringing up Engvall and one of Barabanov or Lehtonen to get 500K closer to the cap).


So important lessons learned today... do not trust nhl insiders. Robertson will go on ltir and no they can not replace him before setting ACSL like an opening day roster. A good learning experience. If Pridham can’t do it, it can not be done.

Edmonton will claim dell and out of respect Spezza will remain unclaimed. This will make him waiver exempt.
17 janv. 2021 à 13 h 4
#22
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Quoting: Jamiepo
So important lessons learned today... do not trust nhl insiders. Robertson will go on ltir and no they can not replace him before setting ACSL like an opening day roster. A good learning experience. If Pridham can’t do it, it can not be done.

Edmonton will claim dell and out of respect Spezza will remain unclaimed. This will make him waiver exempt.


Well yes, I don't trust the insiders, although Mirtle has been pretty close to correct most of the times. I was pretty certain that they would waive Dell and replace him with a higher cap player before putting Robertson on LTIR, but I didn't see them also waiving Spezza for a higher cap player as well.
17 janv. 2021 à 13 h 45
#23
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Miles_Togo
Well yes, I don't trust the insiders, although Mirtle has been pretty close to correct most of the times. I was pretty certain that they would waive Dell and replace him with a higher cap player before putting Robertson on LTIR, but I didn't see them also waiving Spezza for a higher cap player as well.


They certainly can not use emergency player, otherwise they would have.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage