SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My pick for SC champs this year

Créé par: PGHBOB69
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 30 nov. 2020
Publié: 30 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Penguins, Caps, Chicago all won SC’s after having #1 overall picks and hitting on them; getting a superstar, top tier talent. And TB won last year with Stammer.

It’s Edmonton’s, Colorado, Toronto’s turn. And maybe the Isles but Tavares walked and signed with Toronto. So I might count the Isles out. But they will be the 4th team I will lay my money down on, at the casino, in Pittsburgh.

And BTW, I really believe that what Barzal is gonna get. Probably 5 years though. 5 years at 9M per. Maybe 9.5M
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
69 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Marner, Mitchell
  2. Tavares, John
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
COL
  1. Nylander, William
  2. Rielly, Morgan
  3. Robertson, Nicholas
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Barzal, Mathew [Droits de RFA]
NYI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  7. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
481 500 000 $47 740 250 $0 $0 $33 759 750 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 22
#51
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Modifié 1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 28
Quoting: Miles_Togo
Again with the Guinness book of world records level stupid arguments. Schneider is a bottom pairing, poor skating, PK thug, even though he was only slightly less productive in his draft year than Sandin was despite being on a far less offensive team. And 19-year-old Schneider is years and years away from the NHL despite Sandin playing 28 games in the NHL at 19 years old and his problem being a lack of size. Loads of top-20 draft pick Ds play in the NHL in their D+1 - and Schneider was from a much, much stronger draft than Sandin and is probably a better skater. But the Dubas cult is gonna Dubas cult.


no but the leafs are terrible at developing D, so it wouldn't have mattered right? Weren't you just arguing the other day that Sandin is effectively gonna be a bust because we can't get him playing time? If they drafted schneider he wouldn't see the NHL for years bc the leafs are bad at developing D, correct?

also, what? Sandin was WAY more productive than schneider in his draft year

We'll see if Schneider makes the leap to the AHL at 18 and plays 30 minutes a night for a contending team, followed by an NHL debut out of camp as a 19 year old

also lemme know if he wins defenceman of the tournament in the upcoming IIHF competition

I doubt it.

also key to realize is schneider is way bigger than everybody in junior, he gets to outmuscle everybody and outsize everybody. He loses that advantage in the NHL. Sandin put up better numbers being only 5'11". He had to rely on his hockey IQ, skating, and skill.
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 28
#52
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
this just in, GM who acquired joe thornton, jason spezza, zach bogosian, jake muzzin, jimmy vesey, zach hyman, and wayne simmonds does not like big players or grit and toughness


A GM who liked big players, grit or toughness would not need to bring in all those players just to bring the team up to a bare minimum level. Dubas built the team he wanted last season, the Dubas cult celebrated and planned the parade. Then everyone walked all over them and the team embarrassed itself all season long.
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 29
#53
backcheck>paycheck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 194
Quoting: Miles_Togo
I realize that you are completely stupid, but you should at least attempt to use your brain sometimes.


Nah, not for me, thanks.
PGHBOB69 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 31
#54
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: Miles_Togo
A GM who liked big players, grit or toughness would not need to bring in all those players just to bring the team up to a bare minimum level. Dubas built the team he wanted last season, the Dubas cult celebrated and planned the parade. Then everyone walked all over them and the team embarrassed itself all season long.


so even though he fixes the problem you're still gonna rant away that he didn't fix it fast enough?
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 31
#55
backcheck>paycheck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 194
Quoting: Miles_Togo
A GM who liked big players, grit or toughness would not need to bring in all those players just to bring the team up to a bare minimum level. Dubas built the team he wanted last season, the Dubas cult celebrated and planned the parade. Then everyone walked all over them and the team embarrassed itself all season long.


Yes. It had nothing to do with injuries to core players or finding out the guy who was coaching the team was a psychopath.
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 32
#56
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
this just in, GM who acquired joe thornton, jason spezza, zach bogosian, jake muzzin, jimmy vesey, zach hyman, and wayne simmonds does not like big players or grit and toughness


And even though Brodie is an offensive D and not huge. He’s still plays good D and is grittier now. He has to be at 30 and still producing like that. Not as fast as he once was.
chungus a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 36
#57
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
I think someone reported him cause he didn’t seem like he was gonna stop. Ohh well. He probably deserved it!!
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 36
#58
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Quoting: DartGuy86
Yes. It had nothing to do with injuries to core players or finding out the guy who was coaching the team was a psychopath.


Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
so even though he fixes the problem you're still gonna rant away that he didn't fix it fast enough?


I think someone reported him cause he didn’t seem like he was gonna stop. Ohh well. He probably deserved it!!

And IMO did a great job this offseason fixing it!! Especially on limited cap room.
chungus et DartGuy86 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 42
#59
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
so even though he fixes the problem you're still gonna rant away that he didn't fix it fast enough?


If Simmons and Thornton give the leafs 60 games plus, then that’s gonna be a success and well worth it. And they have the depth to not be affected much by their time off. And Vesey is ready to break out IMO. Not everyone can play in NY. I’m actually very jealous of the Signing..lol. And at 900k, you really can’t lose!! And looks like Robertson will be competing for a roster spot as well!! Which I’m excited to see after the Bracco fiasco/failure!!

Im just really interested in what the conferences are gonna look like. If they get put in an All Canada conference. Then they got screwed. But I guess I would rather play Edmonton Calgary, Winepeg, Vancouver over TB and. Boston.
chungus a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 52
#60
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
no but the leafs are terrible at developing D, so it wouldn't have mattered right?


Yes, the best thing for Schneider’s career is that the Leafs didn’t draft him. I already said that in defence of them drafting Amirov. But on the other hand they could try to actually develop D properly.

Quote:
Weren't you just arguing the other day that Sandin is effectively gonna be a bust because we can't get him playing time?


What I said is that Sandin is going to bust because the Leafs have and continue to violate every principal of development. Things that Dubas said the Leafs would never do because they are so harmful.

Quote:
If they drafted schneider he wouldn't see the NHL for years bc the leafs are bad at developing D, correct?


Being bad at development has nothing to do with when a D plays NHL games. Sandin, Girard, Carlo, McAvoy were all playing in the NHL at 19. 3 of them were fortunate enough to be on teams that are good at development, and the other unfortunate enough to be on a team that is terrible at it.

Quote:
also, what? Sandin was WAY more productive than schneider in his draft year


Sandin had 3 more points in 9 fewer games on a powerhouse offensive team that included a 112 point player. Schneider played on a weak team where no player could 62 points.

Quote:
We'll see if Schneider makes the leap to the AHL at 18 and plays 30 minutes a night for a contending team, followed by an NHL debut out of camp as a 19 year old


All this shows is that the constant claims by the Dubas cult that Schneider and other available Ds were 3 years away are not only BS, but they all know their claims are BS.
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 58
#61
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Quoting: DartGuy86
Yes. It had nothing to do with injuries to core players or finding out the guy who was coaching the team was a psychopath.


If those were the problems then Dubas would not have needed to make the changes he did. But Dubas, and anyone with even the most basic hockey understanding, understood that the team was a complete disaster.
PGHBOB69 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 0 h 59
#62
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Modifié 1 déc. 2020 à 1 h 5
Quoting: Miles_Togo
Yes, the best thing for Schneider’s career is that the Leafs didn’t draft him. I already said that in defence of them drafting Amirov. But on the other hand they could try to actually develop D properly.

Quote:
Weren't you just arguing the other day that Sandin is effectively gonna be a bust because we can't get him playing time?


What I said is that Sandin is going to bust because the Leafs have and continue to violate every principal of development. Things that Dubas said the Leafs would never do because they are so harmful.

Quote:
If they drafted schneider he wouldn't see the NHL for years bc the leafs are bad at developing D, correct?


Being bad at development has nothing to do with when a D plays NHL games. Sandin, Girard, Carlo, McAvoy were all playing in the NHL at 19. 3 of them were fortunate enough to be on teams that are good at development, and the other unfortunate enough to be on a team that is terrible at it.

Quote:
also, what? Sandin was WAY more productive than schneider in his draft year


Sandin had 3 more points in 9 fewer games on a powerhouse offensive team that included a 112 point player. Schneider played on a weak team where no player could 62 points.

Quote:
We'll see if Schneider makes the leap to the AHL at 18 and plays 30 minutes a night for a contending team, followed by an NHL debut out of camp as a 19 year old


All this shows is that the constant claims by the Dubas cult that Schneider and other available Ds were 3 years away are not only BS, but they all know their claims are BS.


a guy like schneider who's only noticeable on the ice because he's big and physical against 16 year old's is 3 years away, where-as a guy like sandin who's skilled, a great skater, with great hockey IQ is maybe a little more NHL ready. If you put it in terms of an 82 game season (in their draft year), you have:

19g 53a 72p in 82gp for sandin

10g 49a 59p in 82gp for schneider

Sandin was generally way more dominant, Schneider projects as having a high floor but not a great ceiling.

also, if the leafs somehow moved out muzzin or rielly and put in 5'11" 20 year old sandin in the top 4, would you be defending that move?

The leafs are doing the best thing for sandin, which is not rushing him and letting him dominate in the AHL. If he makes the team out of camp it's playing 12 minutes a night on the bottom pair. That's moronic and would stunt the hell out of his development
1 déc. 2020 à 1 h 18
#63
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Modifié 1 déc. 2020 à 1 h 24
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
a guy like schneider who's only noticeable on the ice because he's big and physical against 16 year old's


You have no idea what you are talking about. It’s embarrassing.

Quote:
also, if the leafs somehow moved out muzzin or rielly and put in 5'11" 20 year old sandin in the top 4, would you be defending that move?


If the Leafs traded Sandin I would support that move.

It’s pretty simple:
1) You do not bring a young prospect into the lineup unless they are ready to be full-time. (This is as much a team issue as a player issue. If the team creates the right environment and role then a very young player can be very successful - see Girard in Colorado. If the team doesn’t then the player may never be in a position to succeed no matter what their age is). Violated multiple times. And I mean this is Dubas’s own rule - which he violated with all of his top prospects.
2) you put a young D with an appropriate partner to mentor and protect them. The Leafs put Sandin with the most inappropriate partners in the NHL.
3) you ensure that there is a route for the prospect to move up the lineup.

At least the Leafs got #1 right with Dermott.

Quote:
The leafs are doing the best thing for sandin, which is not rushing him and letting him dominate in the AHL. If he makes the team out of camp it's playing 12 minutes a night on the bottom pair. That's moronic and would stunt the hell out of his development


The Leafs already did rush him. I was basically the only one opposed (because I knew they did not have a partner or environment in which success was likely) when they did as the Dubas cult knew he could do no wrong. Remember when he spent almost half the season in the NHL getting 12 minutes a game, with completely inappropriate partners and getting scratched? Stunted the hell out his development. Now they should do the right thing and trade him to a team that will take the responsibility of developing him seriously, instead of the joke of a team the Leafs are.
1 déc. 2020 à 1 h 21
#64
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Quoting: Miles_Togo
You have no idea what you are talking about. It’s embarrassing.

Quote:
also, if the leafs somehow moved out muzzin or rielly and put in 5'11" 20 year old sandin in the top 4, would you be defending that move?


If the Leafs traded Sandin I would support that move.

It’s pretty simple:
1) You do not bring a young prospect into the lineup unless they are ready to be full-time. Violated multiple times. And I mean this is Dubas’s own rule - which he violated with all of his top prospects.
2) you put a young D with an appropriate partner to mentor and protect them. The Leafs put Sandin with the most inappropriate partners in the NHL.
3) you ensure that there is a route for the prospect to move up the lineup.

At least the Leafs got #1 right with Dermott.

Quote:
The leafs are doing the best thing for sandin, which is not rushing him and letting him dominate in the AHL. If he makes the team out of camp it's playing 12 minutes a night on the bottom pair. That's moronic and would stunt the hell out of his development


The Leafs already did rush him. I was basically the only one opposed when they did as the Dubas cult knew he could do no wrong. Remember when he spent almost half the season in the NHL getting 12 minutes a game, with completely inappropriate partners and getting scratched? Stunted the hell out his development. Now they should do the right thing and trade him to a team that will take the responsibility of developing him seriously, instead of the joke of a team the Leafs are.


Sandin did get beat up and pushed around last year when he played in the NHL. It was why he was sent Down I read.
1 déc. 2020 à 1 h 33
#65
backcheck>paycheck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 194
Quoting: Miles_Togo
If those were the problems then Dubas would not have needed to make the changes he did. But Dubas, and anyone with even the most basic hockey understanding, understood that the team was a complete disaster.


Those were issues, though. We lacked the depth to sustain injuries, and they fired Babcock. They went 27-15-5 under Keefe. They addressed their depth needs and got tougher this offseason. I wouldn't call them a disaster, but you do you.
1 déc. 2020 à 1 h 36
#66
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Modifié 1 déc. 2020 à 1 h 52
Quoting: PGHBOB69
Sandin did get beat up and pushed around last year when he played in the NHL. It was why he was sent Down I read.


Yes. But all rookies get targeted. Sandin played on a gutless team that wouldn’t stick up for anyone and let opposing players take whatever liberties they wanted. Dubas would not fix the problem. He could have signed Bogo in February, but backed out. Girard was 20 lbs lighter as a rookie (and has only gained about 5 lbs since), but if you try to push around Girard you would instantly get your ass kicked.

Then with everyone knowing that Sandin would benefit tremendously from gaining size and strength, the Leafs tell him to remain in game shape during the shutdown so they can not dress him at all during the return to play - not even the exhibition game. 5 months during which he could have been dedicated to offseason training wasted. And that also meant that he is doing that training now, although with much less time available to him, whereas if it had been done before he could be playing now. Instead he gets a shorter offseason and will go almost a year without playing games. Completely negligent team.
PGHBOB69 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 6 h 48
#67
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,407
Mentions "j'aime": 319
Quoting: PGHBOB69
I love everything Toronto did this offseason. Brodie, Bogs, Simmons, Thornton, Vesey, Spezza and Dermott signings. And the NHL level, goalie depth. And Lehtonen and Barbabnov signings should help both defense and NHL level depth.

I didn’t love the return for A.Johnsson, but he needed traded and I’m sure there weren’t a ton of teams knocking down their door in this flat cap year. I like what they got back from Kapanen. I just hate the Amirov pick. That’s the only thing I really, really, disliked. If they would have picked C.Zary or H.Lapierre, IMO it would have been a Grand slam offseason.

But still they addressed every need on their NHL roster. Toughness, leadership, defense, NHL level depth. Check, Check, Check and Check. Toronto would get an “A” from me for this off-season. It would’ve been an”A+” if they didn’t draft Amirov.


Amirov is a great player. How can you watch him play in Europe (like right now) and say the Leafs bombed that pick... cause you haven't watched him play they just picked the best guy available and not who you wanted...
1 déc. 2020 à 7 h 9
#68
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,407
Mentions "j'aime": 319
Quoting: Miles_Togo
Yes. But all rookies get targeted. Sandin played on a gutless team that wouldn’t stick up for anyone and let opposing players take whatever liberties they wanted. Dubas would not fix the problem. He could have signed Bogo in February, but backed out. Girard was 20 lbs lighter as a rookie (and has only gained about 5 lbs since), but if you try to push around Girard you would instantly get your ass kicked.

Then with everyone knowing that Sandin would benefit tremendously from gaining size and strength, the Leafs tell him to remain in game shape during the shutdown so they can not dress him at all during the return to play - not even the exhibition game. 5 months during which he could have been dedicated to offseason training wasted. And that also meant that he is doing that training now, although with much less time available to him, whereas if it had been done before he could be playing now. Instead he gets a shorter offseason and will go almost a year without playing games. Completely negligent team.


The reason why Dubas didn't get Bogo in February was because just as they were finalizing the deal, that shtishow against Ayres happened and Dubas said no its time to see what this team is and I'll see what this team is and do my moves accordingly. That CBJ series was horrific cause it was a last chance for a lot of Leafs players. That's why Johnsson played over Robertson cause they knew what they had in Robertson. They were showcasing Johnsson and he bombed. This year was a sink or swim season for a lot of Leafs guys. And a very big portion of them sunk. Dubas addressed that.

I've really liked the moves of Dubas. Not just this offseason but since being hired. You can call me apart of a Dubas cult or whatever but it's fact.
DartGuy86 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 10 h 6
#69
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Quoting: DJSums17
The reason why Dubas didn't get Bogo in February was because just as they were finalizing the deal, that shtishow against Ayres happened and Dubas said no its time to see what this team is and I'll see what this team is and do my moves accordingly.


It was a garbage emotional decision by a GM who claims that he doesn't make decisions based on emotions. They had Sandin out there flailing, losing confidence each day, and getting targeted by opposition, playing with a completely inappropriate partner. He had the opportunity to fix that and he chose not to because of an embarrassing loss. This is a GM who had previously said that it is the team's responsibility to always do what is right for your high-end prospects and instead always does the exact opposite. Completely irresponsible.

Quote:
That CBJ series was horrific cause it was a last chance for a lot of Leafs players.


It should have been the last chance for at least one of the big four, and would have been if the team had a visionary leader who actually builds championships and teams that outperform expectations like Masai. But instead the Leafs' have build a team that repeatedly drastically underperforms.

Quote:
That's why Johnsson played over Robertson cause they knew what they had in Robertson.


What are the chances that Robertson is on the team full-time this year? Extremely low based on the AGMs and number of depth forward pieces brought in. So much for Dubas' position that you NEVER bring in a 18 - 20 prospect unless you are certain they are ready to full-time from then on. That will make all three of Dubas' top prospects in which he has done the exact thing that he specifically stated the Leafs' would never do because of how harmful it was.

Quote:
I've really liked the moves of Dubas. Not just this offseason but since being hired. You can call me apart of a Dubas cult or whatever but it's fact.


Turned a 105 point team into a 95 point (pace) team. How many fans would have believed after their 2018 game 7 loss when Dubas took over that the team would have not made it past the first round in the next two years and actually would miss the playoffs in 2020? Essentially none, and those who did think that such an outcome was even possible would be harassed by the rest fanbase who was positive that the team was a surefire contender. Leafs' fans, especially Dubas' analytics cult base, said all the same things last summer, and they were 100% wrong. This is still a badly built and managed team. And they have been sacrificing the future to win now.
1 déc. 2020 à 10 h 42
#70
God bless everyone
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,376
Mentions "j'aime": 9,314
Quoting: PGHBOB69
Sorry Sanderson I meant. I didn’t expect him to go 5 or whatever he went. High though. Above Drysdale!! Crazy!! Yes, that’s the goalies name!! Thank you.

Ya, for sure. No way of knowing. A 50/50 shot. Even less hit though I think last time they did statistics on 1st round picks. And like you said, Dubas has been shown to have a good eye for talent.

Yes, we will see! I just hated the pick!! That’s just IMO. My 1st thought, and Like I said, I tried liking it more. But after watching Highlights and games on YouTube. Didn’t impress me either. Meanwhile watch Zary or Lapierre. They stick out right out. But Amirov is playing against better competition too, so it’s harder to stand-out.. And Guhle is tough. Family has NHL pedigree with his brother. I would have loved them to take Guhle; Like I said, And loaded up on D prospects seeing as Offense probably wont be a problem in the next 6-8 years. The defense, goaltending and toughness will always be alittle weaker. And Guhle would have definitely help in that area. And contribute and be NHL ready quicker.

But yes, we’ll see. And like I said, loved the Neimela and Hirvonen picks!! Loved them, great picks!! I was hoping the Pens took Neimela in the 2nd round or he fell to us In the 3rd. I loved that pick!!


Well, I do think you make a good point. But two things, one, highlights aren't everything. From what I've heard, he's more of a 2way guy. Second, you could be right. Here I am talking like I know about him, when I've never seen him play (I'm looking forward to seeing him at the World junoirs). And yes, I agree the Hirvonen and Neimala picks were good. Thanks for this, love to here what other hockey fans think.
PGHBOB69 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 18
#71
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Quoting: Saskleaf
Well, I do think you make a good point. But two things, one, highlights aren't everything. From what I've heard, he's more of a 2way guy. Second, you could be right. Here I am talking like I know about him, when I've never seen him play (I'm looking forward to seeing him at the World junoirs). And yes, I agree the Hirvonen and Neimala picks were good. Thanks for this, love to here what other hockey fans think.


Ya, I watched a bunch of his game highlights. Not just his highlights. And his highlights too!! But You get a better feel for the player with the team highlights rather than just his highlights IMO. You get to see him without the puck. The competition he’s playing against, ETC.

But yes, I’m not saying I’m an expert on him either. Just saying, I tried to like the pick. But didn’t see much!! lol. But Dubas has shown to be a good judge of talent so far, so we’ll see. I just know, I would have been pissed if that was still the Pens pick though and that’s who they took.

I just don’t see him hitting big. And not having a great floor either. He Might completely bust. IMO u either take the high ceiling player like Lappierre. Or the high Floor player like Zary. I don’t think Amirov has either. Which is why, I’m like WTF is he looking at?? What does he expect?? I don’t see him becoming a superstar or all-star caliber player. And I can see him being a complete bust too. Atleast like, Liljegren, his floor is a NHL D-Man. He will play in the NHL. Same with a player like Hallander. His floor is a NHL bottom 6. He most likely will have an NHL career. But he doesn’t have a huge ceiling. But that’s ok. With Amirov I don’t see a high ceiling or a NHL caliber floor.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 57
#72
God bless everyone
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,376
Mentions "j'aime": 9,314
Quoting: PGHBOB69
Ya, I watched a bunch of his game highlights. Not just his highlights. And his highlights too!! But You get a better feel for the player with the team highlights rather than just his highlights IMO. You get to see him without the puck. The competition he’s playing against, ETC.

But yes, I’m not saying I’m an expert on him either. Just saying, I tried to like the pick. But didn’t see much!! lol. But Dubas has shown to be a good judge of talent so far, so we’ll see. I just know, I would have been pissed if that was still the Pens pick though and that’s who they took.

I just don’t see him hitting big. And not having a great floor either. He Might completely bust. IMO u either take the high ceiling player like Lappierre. Or the high Floor player like Zary. I don’t think Amirov has either. Which is why, I’m like WTF is he looking at?? What does he expect?? I don’t see him becoming a superstar or all-star caliber player. And I can see him being a complete bust too. Atleast like, Liljegren, his floor is a NHL D-Man. He will play in the NHL. Same with a player like Hallander. His floor is a NHL bottom 6. He most likely will have an NHL career. But he doesn’t have a huge ceiling. But that’s ok. With Amirov I don’t see a high ceiling or a NHL caliber floor.


Well, who knows. To be honest, you sound like you looked into him more than me do I won’t argue further.
PGHBOB69 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 17 h 21
#73
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Quoting: Saskleaf
Well, who knows. To be honest, you sound like you looked into him more than me do I won’t argue further.


Probably alittle bit. But no, I would obvioulsy trust Dubas’s opinion more than mine..lol. And like I said, so far he’s seems to be a good judge of talent. And I loved the Neimela and Hirvonen picks!! I wanted the Pens to take Neimela in the 2nd round or was hoping he would fall to them in the 3rd. Hirvonen is alittle under-sized But he was rated a lot higher than late 2nd round.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2020 à 8 h 6
#74
God bless everyone
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,376
Mentions "j'aime": 9,314
Quoting: PGHBOB69
Probably alittle bit. But no, I would obvioulsy trust Dubas’s opinion more than mine..lol. And like I said, so far he’s seems to be a good judge of talent. And I loved the Neimela and Hirvonen picks!! I wanted the Pens to take Neimela in the 2nd round or was hoping he would fall to them in the 3rd. Hirvonen is alittle under-sized But he was rated a lot higher than late 2nd round.


Ya, I agree.
PGHBOB69 a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2020 à 3 h 11
#75
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,407
Mentions "j'aime": 319
Quoting: Miles_Togo
It was a garbage emotional decision by a GM who claims that he doesn't make decisions based on emotions. They had Sandin out there flailing, losing confidence each day, and getting targeted by opposition, playing with a completely inappropriate partner. He had the opportunity to fix that and he chose not to because of an embarrassing loss. This is a GM who had previously said that it is the team's responsibility to always do what is right for your high-end prospects and instead always does the exact opposite. Completely irresponsible.

Quote:
That CBJ series was horrific cause it was a last chance for a lot of Leafs players.


It should have been the last chance for at least one of the big four, and would have been if the team had a visionary leader who actually builds championships and teams that outperform expectations like Masai. But instead the Leafs' have build a team that repeatedly drastically underperforms.

Quote:
That's why Johnsson played over Robertson cause they knew what they had in Robertson.


What are the chances that Robertson is on the team full-time this year? Extremely low based on the AGMs and number of depth forward pieces brought in. So much for Dubas' position that you NEVER bring in a 18 - 20 prospect unless you are certain they are ready to full-time from then on. That will make all three of Dubas' top prospects in which he has done the exact thing that he specifically stated the Leafs' would never do because of how harmful it was.

Quote:
I've really liked the moves of Dubas. Not just this offseason but since being hired. You can call me apart of a Dubas cult or whatever but it's fact.


Turned a 105 point team into a 95 point (pace) team. How many fans would have believed after their 2018 game 7 loss when Dubas took over that the team would have not made it past the first round in the next two years and actually would miss the playoffs in 2020? Essentially none, and those who did think that such an outcome was even possible would be harassed by the rest fanbase who was positive that the team was a surefire contender. Leafs' fans, especially Dubas' analytics cult base, said all the same things last summer, and they were 100% wrong. This is still a badly built and managed team. And they have been sacrificing the future to win now.


Robertson is a guarantee in my eyes. Don't base your decisions of a franchise because of AGMs. You know the team is young and the GM is young too. Both are learning and I trust Dubas considering he took a team in 2013 that has the most embarrassing loss in franchise history to what the team is now. It took a global pandemic to make the Leafs to miss the playoffs. Under normal circumstances no way the Leafs miss. Sure they rushed Sandin but he could handle it there's a difference. Sandin looked young not out of place.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage