Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
no but the leafs are terrible at developing D, so it wouldn't have mattered right?
Yes, the best thing for Schneider’s career is that the Leafs didn’t draft him. I already said that in defence of them drafting Amirov. But on the other hand they could try to actually develop D properly.
Quote:
Weren't you just arguing the other day that Sandin is effectively gonna be a bust because we can't get him playing time?
What I said is that Sandin is going to bust because the Leafs have and continue to violate every principal of development. Things that Dubas said the Leafs would never do because they are so harmful.
Quote:
If they drafted schneider he wouldn't see the NHL for years bc the leafs are bad at developing D, correct?
Being bad at development has nothing to do with when a D plays NHL games. Sandin, Girard, Carlo, McAvoy were all playing in the NHL at 19. 3 of them were fortunate enough to be on teams that are good at development, and the other unfortunate enough to be on a team that is terrible at it.
Quote:
also, what? Sandin was WAY more productive than schneider in his draft year
Sandin had 3 more points in 9 fewer games on a powerhouse offensive team that included a 112 point player. Schneider played on a weak team where no player could 62 points.
Quote:
We'll see if Schneider makes the leap to the AHL at 18 and plays 30 minutes a night for a contending team, followed by an NHL debut out of camp as a 19 year old
All this shows is that the constant claims by the Dubas cult that Schneider and other available Ds were 3 years away are not only BS, but they all know their claims are BS.