SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Solving Bolts in worst case scenarios

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2020-21 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 24 nov. 2020
Publié: 24 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hypothetically if all their RFAs got max level offer sheets that they'd probably sign for.

Not taking NTCs into account in this post because let's face it the NTC players are the one TB would be moving in this kind of circumstance.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
56 544 640 $
56 544 640 $
54 365 095 $
2737 500 $
2737 500 $
Transactions
1.
TBL
  1. Moore, John
  2. Zboril, Jakub
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
2.
TBL
  1. Strålman, Anton (2 750 000 $ retained)
FLA
  1. Johnson, Tyler
  2. Katchouk, Boris
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
3.
TBL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NSH)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (COL)
4.
TBL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
5.
TBL
  1. Wood, Miles
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (ARI)
NJD
  1. Gourde, Yanni
  2. Lipanov, Alexey
  3. Moore, John
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de ARI
Logo de TBL
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
2022
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2023
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 351 133 $0 $500 000 $148 867 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
759 258 $759 258 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 544 640 $6 544 640 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
737 500 $737 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
737 500 $737 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 365 095 $4 365 095 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 544 640 $6 544 640 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
737 500 $737 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 nov. 2020 à 11 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,579
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Change the 1st to a 3rd and then we'll talk. Tampa should keep Foote and not use him to get rid of a bad contract. Stralman is a 3rd pair D, Schenn is a 8th D and not sure if Bahl is ready. In " worst case scenarios ", isn't it more likely all RFAs get bridge deals?
yikes a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2020 à 11 h 23
#2
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,072
Mentions "j'aime": 12,828
Why would Tampa trade Foote? They could just keep him and us him on D. Trading gourde would be easier than TJ so dump moore for like a 3rd + spec and the trade gourde for little return instead of having to lose Foote who they would desperately need here.

I know it’s worse case but dumping moore and gourde together is super unlikely and hurts you more than splitting them
24 nov. 2020 à 11 h 27
#3
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: bhavikp27
Change the 1st to a 3rd and then we'll talk. Tampa should keep Foote and not use him to get rid of a bad contract. Stralman is a 3rd pair D, Schenn is a 8th D and not sure if Bahl is ready. In " worst case scenarios ", isn't it more likely all RFAs get bridge deals?


Lol no. With Moore coming back as a bad contract BOS will be adding to the pile. That's how dealing with division rivals work.

Strålman works with Sergachev as the 2nd pair D just fine. Schenn is a placeholder D.

By worst case scenario I put the maximum offer sheet contracts with the known compensation for those guys. I do believe that Tampa will re-sign the guys with bridge deals but it's not the point of this post.
24 nov. 2020 à 11 h 27
#4
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: yikes
Why would Tampa trade Foote? They could just keep him and us him on D. Trading gourde would be easier than TJ so dump moore for like a 3rd + spec and the trade gourde for little return instead of having to lose Foote who they would desperately need here.

I know it’s worse case but dumping moore and gourde together is super unlikely and hurts you more than splitting them


Fair enough.
yikes a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2020 à 11 h 29
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Tampa isn't trading Foote, They will need some of their cheap ELCs, Doubt Boston has the cap space for Ryan McDonagh. And that Gourde contract is brutal doubt the Devils have any interest in him.
masterjuddi a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2020 à 11 h 47
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
I think all your contracts are high.
Sergachev is probably in the 4 mil range. I don't know how you came up with 6+. You act like he's a proven 1LD, He's not. He'd be a 2LD at tampa, looking at 4 mil range.
Cirelli probably gets 4-5 range on a short term deal.
Cernak the case could be made for 4 mil as he's probably their best RD as of right now. But it's really hard to say.
They aren't taking cap back when they move McDonagh, that mess up there is a good example as to why.
Although don't count on a huge return either.
24 nov. 2020 à 12 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 16
Mentions "j'aime": 2
I highly doubt the Bruins want or would give up all that for McDonagh and the Florida and Nashville trades wouldn't be accepted other wise not a bad job
24 nov. 2020 à 12 h 15
#8
In Zito We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 2,790
Mentions "j'aime": 1,596
Quoting: Scars_37
I highly doubt the Bruins want or would give up all that for McDonagh and the Florida and Nashville trades wouldn't be accepted other wise not a bad job


Are you kidding me? That trade is great for Florida! I'd take that any day!
24 nov. 2020 à 12 h 21
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 3,902
Mentions "j'aime": 1,760
Quoting: pharrow
I think all your contracts are high.
Sergachev is probably in the 4 mil range. I don't know how you came up with 6+. You act like he's a proven 1LD, He's not. He'd be a 2LD at tampa, looking at 4 mil range.
Cirelli probably gets 4-5 range on a short term deal.
Cernak the case could be made for 4 mil as he's probably their best RD as of right now. But it's really hard to say.
They aren't taking cap back when they move McDonagh, that mess up there is a good example as to why.
Although don't count on a huge return either.


Sergachev's value right now probably lies around 4 AAV, but his agency is gonna ask for 6-7 based on term and potential. I think he signs a bridge for around 5 or he's traded. Probably the best trade chip they have and are willing to lose.
I agree that Cirelli is high...he gave him Point money like last year and Point was a 92 point player opposed to Cirellis 44 in 68. I know they are different players, but that's too much IMO.
Cernak is overpayed IMO
24 nov. 2020 à 12 h 41
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: masterjuddi
Sergachev's value right now probably lies around 4 AAV, but his agency is gonna ask for 6-7 based on term and potential. I think he signs a bridge for around 5 or he's traded. Probably the best trade chip they have and are willing to lose.
I agree that Cirelli is high...he gave him Point money like last year and Point was a 92 point player opposed to Cirellis 44 in 68. I know they are different players, but that's too much IMO.
Cernak is overpayed IMO


We will have to agree to disagree on Sergachev's . He's not a 1st pairing guy right now. The potential thing I'm not going to get into that.
As of right now he's on a team where Headman takes that role.

You look at some of the other young guys.
Pulock got 5
Deangelo got 4.8
Nurse got 5.6 but that was before Covid.

All guys on RFA. Similar stats roles.
Really only guys seeing 6+ are UFAs.
4-5 range is where he'll be at. I think Deangelo contract is a good marker for him to be honest.
masterjuddi a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2020 à 12 h 51
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 16
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: VijayPatel11
Are you kidding me? That trade is great for Florida! I'd take that any day!


Yeah the first round pick is nice but they wouldn't take on Johnson's contract and retain some of Stralman's because that is a lot of cap space that just vanished.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage