SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If PIT Even SNIFFS That Marino Is Taking Over 1RD

Créé par: Arom5477
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 12 nov. 2020
Publié: 12 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
PIT
    Traded after training camp.

    I just don't see any point to him being on the team. There are younger, faster, and cheaper options already.
    2.
    PIT
    1. Fabbro, Dante
    2. Järnkrok, Calle
    Détails additionnels:
    Picks to balance.
    NSH
    1. Letang, Kris
    2. McCann, Jared
    Détails additionnels:
    Picks to balance.

    This trade depends on:

    1.) How close NSH is to being legit contenders; if they're right on the edge, I could see them doing this for more offense from their D and high offensive upside, in McCann, to replace Jarnkrok.

    2.) They didn't sign Mike Hoffman.
    3.
    PIT
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de ANA
    2022
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    2023
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $68 961 009 $0 $1 700 000 $12 538 991 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    894 167 $894 167 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
    DG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    12 nov. 2020 à 13 h 23
    #1
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,107
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,841
    I just don’t know if Nash would trade fabbro - but McCann is a nice piece and so letang obvi. I think pit would be the team adding IMO just due to age/ cap. But argument could be made the other way just as easily as pens giving high current value assets.
    Arom5477 et HockeyTownUSA69 a aimé ceci.
    12 nov. 2020 à 13 h 28
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 15,921
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
    We’ve already established on here that McCann / jarkonk are similar value

    So pens are essentially trading letang for fabbro, who had one of the worst seasons last year (by analytics) in the entire league? I get he’s a young player, but that’s an extremely hard pass. Pens get significantly worse
    Pensfan89 et HockeyTownUSA69 a aimé ceci.
    12 nov. 2020 à 13 h 37
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 1,063
    Mentions "j'aime": 215
    i dont think trading away Ekholm and Fabbro and getting Letang and McCann is part of NSH rebuild...
    gmgb a aimé ceci.
    12 nov. 2020 à 13 h 40
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 7,670
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,254
    NSH wholeheartedly declines. Jarnkrok and McCann are probably close in value, but I'd rather keep Jarnkrok. Cheaper, more versatile, and I don't believe that McCann has much more untapped potential. Fabbro's rookie season had some bumps, but he's NSH's only young, cost-effective, top four defenseman right now. Letang might have value to the right team, but NSH isn't one of them.
    12 nov. 2020 à 14 h 34
    #5
    LETS go PENS
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 529
    Mentions "j'aime": 208
    McCann better than Jarnkrok right now. And is only 24 years old!! Letang would bring back more than Fabbro. Letang still scored 44 points in 55 games last year and 56 in 65 games the year b4. And was still voted a 10 top Defender by NHL network for next year. He was like 7th or 8th.
    12 nov. 2020 à 14 h 36
    #6
    LETS go PENS
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 529
    Mentions "j'aime": 208
    Quoting: gmgb
    NSH wholeheartedly declines. Jarnkrok and McCann are probably close in value, but I'd rather keep Jarnkrok. Cheaper, more versatile, and I don't believe that McCann has much more untapped potential. Fabbro's rookie season had some bumps, but he's NSH's only young, cost-effective, top four defenseman right now. Letang might have value to the right team, but NSH isn't one of them.


    McCann better than Jarnkrok right now. And is only 24 years old!! Letang would bring back more than Fabbro. Letang still scored 44 points in 55 games last year and 56 in 65 games the year b4. And was still voted a 10 top Defender by NHL network for next year. He was like 7th or 8th.
    12 nov. 2020 à 15 h 22
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 7,670
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,254
    Quoting: HockeyTownUSA69
    McCann better than Jarnkrok right now. And is only 24 years old!! Letang would bring back more than Fabbro. Letang still scored 44 points in 55 games last year and 56 in 65 games the year b4. And was still voted a 10 top Defender by NHL network for next year. He was like 7th or 8th.


    I disagree about McCann being better - I think Jarnkrok is the better overall player, but it's relatively close. I outlined why I'd prefer to have Jarnkrok. Letang's trade value is tricky, because you'd have to find a team that needs him, can absorb his salary, and isn't scared off by his age, injury history, and decline. I'm not sure what teams would be on that list. Nashville wouldn't be one of them. Whatever the potential return for him would be is irrelevant, as it doesn't make sense for PIT to trade him. He's still their best defenseman by a mile, and they appear to be trying to keep their competitive window open for as long as possible.
    12 nov. 2020 à 15 h 37
    #8
    LETS go PENS
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 529
    Mentions "j'aime": 208
    Quoting: gmgb
    I disagree about McCann being better - I think Jarnkrok is the better overall player, but it's relatively close. I outlined why I'd prefer to have Jarnkrok. Letang's trade value is tricky, because you'd have to find a team that needs him, can absorb his salary, and isn't scared off by his age, injury history, and decline. I'm not sure what teams would be on that list. Nashville wouldn't be one of them. Whatever the potential return for him would be is irrelevant, as it doesn't make sense for PIT to trade him. He's still their best defenseman by a mile, and they appear to be trying to keep their competitive window open for as long as possible.


    I know the problem u are having
    My man!! McCann has had two 35 point seasons back to back years!! He only played 5 seasons in the NHL. Since he was 19. Not 6 years and since he was 18. 2018 you are looking at those stats as 2 separate years. He played for 2 teams. And had 19 goals and 35 points b/ween the 2 teams in 78 games!! Those 2 stats lines arnt separate seasons. He had 14 goals and 35 points last year. And 19 goals and 35 points the year b4. And again has played in the NHL since he was 19. And has been bounced around from 3rd line C. To top 6. To 4th line Winger. This year, he is staying on the LW, 3rd line!! Where he belongs. And do what he does best. Put the puck in the net. And will score 20 plus. And is still just 24.
    12 nov. 2020 à 18 h 29
    #9
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    I love lines like this "I just don't see any point to him being on the team. There are younger, faster, and cheaper options already."

    Like what do you think every other team is going to think too?

    Oh yeah sure we'll take him?

    It's a one year expiring deal. Unless a team has a need due to injury he's probably not going anywhere
    12 nov. 2020 à 18 h 32
    #10
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: gmgb
    I disagree about McCann being better - I think Jarnkrok is the better overall player, but it's relatively close. I outlined why I'd prefer to have Jarnkrok. Letang's trade value is tricky, because you'd have to find a team that needs him, can absorb his salary, and isn't scared off by his age, injury history, and decline. I'm not sure what teams would be on that list. Nashville wouldn't be one of them. Whatever the potential return for him would be is irrelevant, as it doesn't make sense for PIT to trade him. He's still their best defenseman by a mile, and they appear to be trying to keep their competitive window open for as long as possible.


    trading Letang isn't tricky. It's not like you are talking about the Burns contract or something. His contract ends in 2 years. There is little risk there. What you see is basically what you get.
    If they aren't in the playoffs next year, he probably gets shopped out for a 1st and prospect at deadline or before.
    Massive retool will start after next years outcome.
    HockeyTownUSA69 a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage