SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ive never been right before

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 6 oct. 2020
Publié: 6 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
2018
I wanted Q Hughes, then Whalstrom at 8 (We got Boqvist, which I am pleased with now, but didn’t know too much then, I think it worked out)
2019
I wanted Bowen Byram, then Alex Turcotte, then Cozens (We got Kirby Dach, who was not on my radar for 3, would say it worked out)

2020
I wanted Lappiere then Ghule (Reichel was not in my mind for our first round choice, but I hope he follows the trend.)

Hopefully we can pick up a decent player tommorow, RoR, Cog, L. Tuch, etc.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Strome, Dylan
23 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Murray, Matt [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Can’t wait for this post to be cited in a “Trades complied from other fans ACGM post” Obviously this trade is garbage, if it were to happen I would change my username and profile picture to anti Bowman propaganda.
PIT
  1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Shoutout to the pens fans in The Hockey Guys live stream that were breaking a fake Matt Murray for Dylan Strome trade. You guys had me going for a minute.
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Caggiula, Drake [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 598 814 $1 090 244 $5 215 000 $8 901 186 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Strome, Dylan
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 oct. 2020 à 23 h 8
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,693
Mentions "j'aime": 9,843
We never had a chance at Q Hughes to be fair. But I hear ya. I was a Wahlstrom guy (also Boqvist to be honest) and then Byram Cozens guy. Lets give Lukas a shot.

As for the trades...NO
Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 23 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,241
Mentions "j'aime": 2,193
Nah thats what I was saying! I was mad we took Joki over Tolvanen, which now looks like a great pick, I was mad we took Boqvist over Bouchard, I was mad we took Dach over Turcotte. Im just trusting Kelley
Kyle_Davidson et Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 23 h 12
#3
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,871
Mentions "j'aime": 5,858
Quoting: exo2769
We never had a chance at Q Hughes to be fair. But I hear ya. I was a Wahlstrom guy (also Boqvist to be honest) and then Byram Cozens guy. Lets give Lukas a shot.

As for the trades...NO


What I mean is that the Blackhawks picked better players when they were available then I would have. Noah Dobson had my eye past whalstrom, I know they didn’t have a chance at Q Hughes, so I didn’t hold it against them in my explanation.

Edit: they had me going, my heart was beating a bit faster when they kept posting it.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 23 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 698
Mentions "j'aime": 166
Murray for Strome is awful value. Clown wants 7 x 7 despite being in the 50s for the best goalies this season
csick a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 23 h 13
#5
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,303
Mentions "j'aime": 24,132
You guys have great centre depth. I thought Mercer was the best choice but Reichel was the 2nd choice imo. I knew he’d go this high. He gives u guys awesome LW depth. Maybe next year is the year you guys get your #1LHD. The building blocks are there, just missing a 1LHD and 1G among the prospect pool
Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 23 h 14
#6
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,871
Mentions "j'aime": 5,858
Quoting: csick
You guys have great centre depth. I thought Mercer was the best choice but Reichel was the 2nd choice imo. I knew he’d go this high. He gives u guys awesome LW depth. Maybe next year is the year you guys get your #1LHD. The building blocks are there, just missing a 1LHD and 1G among the prospect pool


Would say we’re bare on RW as well, off topic. Sanderson?
csick a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 23 h 18
#7
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Well I'm also hoping we draft Ryan O'Rourke tommorow
csick a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 23 h 18
#8
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,303
Mentions "j'aime": 24,132
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Would say we’re bare on RW as well, off topic. Sanderson?


I didn’t like him at first but the past few weeks he’s grown on me. A championship team needs a Dman like that, he’s a fluid skater, he’s really hard to be beat 1 on 1, he could definitely improve his offensive numbers but he reminds me of McDonagh/Jones with a little Heiskanen flavoured in there. He’s the Brady Tkachuk of defence. But clearly the Sens are building an identity of hard to play against with Tkachuk, Pinto, Greig, Sanderson, JBD. Speaking of that, he’s probably gonna be paired with JBD at UND. Future pair mayeb?
6 oct. 2020 à 23 h 28
#9
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,871
Mentions "j'aime": 5,858
Quoting: csick
I didn’t like him at first but the past few weeks he’s grown on me. A championship team needs a Dman like that, he’s a fluid skater, he’s really hard to be beat 1 on 1, he could definitely improve his offensive numbers but he reminds me of McDonagh/Jones with a little Heiskanen flavoured in there. He’s the Brady Tkachuk of defence. But clearly the Sens are building an identity of hard to play against with Tkachuk, Pinto, Greig, Sanderson, JBD. Speaking of that, he’s probably gonna be paired with JBD at UND. Future pair mayeb?


I like him, I think Ottawa is going to as well. Lots of fans in the stream were upset with the pick, I thought it was a bit of a reach, but made sense with Raymond being gone. Ottawa will be fine, unless your owner does not want to pay your guys.
csick a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 23 h 29
#10
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,303
Mentions "j'aime": 24,132
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
I like him, I think Ottawa is going to as well. Lots of fans in the stream were upset with the pick, I thought it was a bit of a reach, but made sense with Raymond being gone. Ottawa will be fine, unless your owner does not want to pay your guys.


I think we might see both top 5 picks in the lineup by the end of the year if their season ends before end of NHL season
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage