SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Moving seabs and adding Gaudreau

Créé par: WhatNowDiscussion
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 14 sept. 2020
Publié: 14 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
1. I love Koekkoek game. He's a smooth skater, very physical, and smart defensively. He showed a lot of promise in the playoffs and he looks to be a potential top 6 defenseman

2. Adding a true third line center allows the hawks to have 2 high end scoring lines and a shutdown line rather than having to pull players apart to even out lines.

3. I would rather go all in on Kubs now than risk another Panarin fiasco. Kubs looks legit as he's dominated every league he's played in. Plus if it pays off, you have a 30+ goal scorer getting payed under $7 mil
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
66 750 000 $
1975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYI
  1. Seabrook, Brent (500 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
Opens up more roster spot on D for the incoming rookies
2.
WPG
  1. De Haan, Calvin
  2. Sikura, Dylan
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
3.
CGY
  1. Nylander, Alexander
  2. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NJD
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $70 303 706 $1 090 244 $4 282 500 $11 196 294 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 280 000 $2 280 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 sept. 2020 à 18 h 6
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
That’s horrible for Calgary. Easy decline, if you want gaudreau flames will want Dach
14 sept. 2020 à 18 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 340
Mentions "j'aime": 103
NYI have guys like Boychuk and probably Leddy that they going to be looking to move. I don't really see it.
14 sept. 2020 à 18 h 10
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,156
Mentions "j'aime": 521
Isles would only do this if you could practically guarantee Seabrook would make LTIR, at which point, this trade would be a gamble for Chicago to see if Ladd can also make LTIR. So not worth it for Chicago either. The Isles might attempt something very similar to this with a different albatross contract, but that contract wouldn’t have to be as buy out proof as Seabrook’s is.
14 sept. 2020 à 18 h 14
#4
Démarrer sujet
44 Foundation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 93
Quoting: flamesfan
That’s horrible for Calgary. Easy decline, if you want gaudreau flames will want Dach


HAHAHAHA no. Dach has much more value than gaudreau. Plus all indications point to flames making some drastic moves and Strome and Nylander combined will have a lower cap hit than gaudreau allowing for more freedom to either sign FA's or trade for better players.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2020 à 18 h 15
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
Quoting: WhatNowDiscussion
HAHAHAHA no. Dach has much more value than gaudreau. Plus all indications point to flames making some drastic moves and Strome and Nylander combined will have a lower cap hit than gaudreau allowing for more freedom to either sign FA's or trade for better players.


Nylander can barely make the nhl and Strome would be 3c for the flames. Gaudreau has the 11th most points since he entered the league and only 9 less than ovechkin and gaudreau played less games. If you want gaudreau it will cost Dach and 2022 first
14 sept. 2020 à 18 h 21
#6
Démarrer sujet
44 Foundation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 93
Quoting: flamesfan
Nylander can barely make the nhl and Strome would be 3c for the flames. Gaudreau has the 11th most points since he entered the league and only 9 less than ovechkin and gaudreau played less games. If you want gaudreau it will cost Dach and 2022 first


Nylander was on pace for over 30 points in his first full season. I wouldn't call that a barley NHLer not to mention he's only 22. Strome could easily slot in at the number 2 position over Backlund.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2020 à 18 h 28
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,928
Quoting: flamesfan
Nylander can barely make the nhl and Strome would be 3c for the flames. Gaudreau has the 11th most points since he entered the league and only 9 less than ovechkin and gaudreau played less games. If you want gaudreau it will cost Dach and 2022 first


I would honestly argue Strome bineg better than both Monahan and Backlund. At center strome has something like 80 points in 95 games with the hawks. Colliton threw him on the wing and he had 3 points in 13 games. A line of gudreau-strome-Lindholm would no doubt be as productive if not more productive than in monahan was in there. Mohanham really isn't that good IMO. And Dach is absolutly untouchable and both like double gudreau anyways lol
14 sept. 2020 à 18 h 28
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 717
Quoting: flamesfan
Nylander can barely make the nhl and Strome would be 3c for the flames. Gaudreau has the 11th most points since he entered the league and only 9 less than ovechkin and gaudreau played less games. If you want gaudreau it will cost Dach and 2022 first


I don't think his trade is fair to the flames but honestly it's hell of a lot better than yours.
14 sept. 2020 à 19 h 13
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,309
Mentions "j'aime": 19,555
Quoting: Wadejos123
I would honestly argue Strome bineg better than both Monahan and Backlund. At center strome has something like 80 points in 95 games with the hawks. Colliton threw him on the wing and he had 3 points in 13 games. A line of gudreau-strome-Lindholm would no doubt be as productive if not more productive than in monahan was in there. Mohanham really isn't that good IMO. And Dach is absolutly untouchable and both like double gudreau anyways lol


Strome is a clear inferior version on Monahan, they are both big players with bad foot speed and dont hit. The difference is Monahan is a much better offensive player
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2020 à 19 h 17
#10
Démarrer sujet
44 Foundation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 93
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Strome is a clear inferior version on Monahan, they are both big players with bad foot speed and dont hit. The difference is Monahan is a much better offensive player


I agree however Strome is 2 years younger and when given the opportunity to get consistent playing time, looks to be dominate. The reason I'm moving him is because hawks have Dach and Toews
14 sept. 2020 à 19 h 19
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,309
Mentions "j'aime": 19,555
Quoting: WhatNowDiscussion
I agree however Strome is 2 years younger and when given the opportunity to get consistent playing time, looks to be dominate. The reason I'm moving him is because hawks have Dach and Toews


I'm aware of why you are moving him but he definitely doesn't return Gaudreau. He is also a horrible fit for Calgary, the last thing they need is a 2nd (worse) version of Monahan. It's as simple as Flames don't want anything to do with Strome
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage