Pretty sure Dubois, after this playoffs run is untouchable.

CBJ declines (not the worst value but gotta think Suzuki goes the other way if theres a deal between the two teams) and the Jets accept before you can think again.

If you want Dubois and are serious. It’s Suzuki and Domi as a starting point. This is an overpayment but you need to massively overpay to get Dubois due to him being seen as untouchable by the team.

No the Jets don't accept.

Mmm, no thanks. I don’t think we accept any trade for Dubois from Montreal.

Why????? You could argue that Tatar and Gallagher are better than Ehlers now (Ehlers may eclipse them in the future)
Both at really good cap hits and you throw in a solid young dman like Mete, Jets would be idiotic to decline

Oh and take a cap dump back

Edit: Thought the two were locked up for another year not just one. Still think Jets drastically improve from this deal

Hoping he'd rather get out of columbus.. He did have his spats with torts... Still a pipe dream though i know

who doesn't have spats with Torts? lol

if he wants to leave, he can do what Matthews did, sign to UFA and f-off ala Tavares. LOL

Two rentals don't get you anywhere near Ehlers. Very, very, very easy no for Winnipeg.

Ehlers has 5 years left, Gallagher two and Tatar one so yeah its just not worth losing all those years of Ehlers in his prime, Jets don't need another tiny dman, they have enough of those already.

Good luck trying to convince Mtl fans to give up Suzuki lol. They believe 2 quarters, 3 dimes and 4 nickels is more than enough for a superstar.

It’s what Mtl fans do....

Gallagher only has one year as well. Unless I'm reading his contract wrong.

Sorry, you're right, Gallagher has one year left, both he and Tatar expire at the same time, yeah I'd easily pass on this.

Also they're going to be like 30 and 31 when their new deals start, even if they were willing to sign with Winnipeg their contracts would likely be anchors in a couple years, there's literally nothing appealing about trading Ehlers for this imo.