SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic trade and signing Lets Chat

Créé par: B28
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 1 sept. 2020
Publié: 1 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Focusing and building a competitive team for next year

Hopefully the year after , benning can offload one of Myers or Eriksson to Seattle expansion so that we can fit Hughes & Petey for $8+ mil / per ,

Additional moves next year , Edler take a pay cut of $3 mil for 1yr , Pearson & Benn let go during FA

Trade Demko for something to improve team or pick
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 800 000 $
2975 000 $
31 300 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
56 000 000 $
35 000 000 $
45 500 000 $
42 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 051 879 $1 700 000 $4 750 000 $448 121 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
975 000 $975 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 sept. 2020 à 17 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,900
Mentions "j'aime": 6,397
I wouldn't trade Juolevi, it also makes more sense to trade Beagle instead of Sutter
sedin33 et B28 a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2020 à 17 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Sens accept. We’d also do the other trade lol
B28 et PLDGEY a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2020 à 17 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,752
Mentions "j'aime": 986
They don't need to move Sutter, he only has 1 year left
sedin33 et B28 a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2020 à 17 h 50
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 42
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: TheAlien
I wouldn't trade Juolevi, it also makes more sense to trade Beagle instead of Sutter


I personally would keep beagle > sutter just cause he still very solid in faceoff. But i can understand , trading beagle is MUCH more beneficial than trading sutter

Would you think devil would take beagle who has 2 more years instead of Sutter ? Cause i wouldn't mind that at all
1 sept. 2020 à 17 h 53
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,930
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
Vancouver loses on both trades. Markstrom signs before you put the contract down. 5 years? geez long time for a 30 year old goalie

You don't have much money to resign Hughes and Pettersson.
B28 a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2020 à 17 h 53
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 42
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: C21
They don't need to move Sutter, he only has 1 year left


But to fit our cap for next year , I feel Sutter would be easier to trade ?

Or would you think its smarter to find a trade to ship out rousell , beagle , myers , eriksson ? What you think would be some ADDS on our end to package any of those contracts ?
1 sept. 2020 à 17 h 58
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 42
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: sedin33
Vancouver loses on both trades. Markstrom signs before you put the contract down. 5 years? geez long time for a 30 year old goalie

You don't have much money to resign Hughes and Pettersson.


I do think its too long of a contract , but bargaining power is with Markstrom ... plus i do think he would by 3rd ish year of that contract switch to a mentor role

In regards to no money to sign Petey and Hughes , i do agree it will be real tight ... hopefully Benning can work a deal with Seattle for Erikkson or Myers ... just cause Vancouver is close by to Seattle , maybe that would be a perk for Myers or Erikkson to not have Seattle in their M-NTC. If we are able to do that , we can afford 18 million for both Petey and Hughes (hoping that is enough for both)
1 sept. 2020 à 18 h 6
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,718
Mentions "j'aime": 18,535
Trades look realistic. What is Virtanen's RFA deal gonna look like?
1 sept. 2020 à 18 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,930
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
Quoting: B28
I do think its too long of a contract , but bargaining power is with Markstrom ... plus i do think he would by 3rd ish year of that contract switch to a mentor role

In regards to no money to sign Petey and Hughes , i do agree it will be real tight ... hopefully Benning can work a deal with Seattle for Erikkson or Myers ... just cause Vancouver is close by to Seattle , maybe that would be a perk for Myers or Erikkson to not have Seattle in their M-NTC. If we are able to do that , we can afford 18 million for both Petey and Hughes (hoping that is enough for both)


I think your premise is wrong. Their best players (Hughes and Pettersson) are young. They don't need to compete for a cup next year with guys like Tanev, Taffoli that will not get better. Save your powder and give Hughes and Pettersson the pieces that they will need to compete for a cup for as long as possible. Instead of Tanev, target Cernak. Instead of Taffoli, let Podkolzin take that spot. Try to resign Markstrom, but not > 3 years.
1 sept. 2020 à 20 h 40
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,752
Mentions "j'aime": 986
Quoting: B28
But to fit our cap for next year , I feel Sutter would be easier to trade ?

Or would you think its smarter to find a trade to ship out rousell , beagle , myers , eriksson ? What you think would be some ADDS on our end to package any of those contracts ?


I think you should be moving contracts that expire past next year.
Sutter isn't a priority
Myers is probably impossible to move
Eriksson would take a fair bit to move but I thinks it's more than doable and clears the most space out of the viable options
Beagle & Roussel would help you a lot more than than Sutter and Baertschi & they'd be easier to move than Louis & Tyler.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage