SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bring OEL Home 2 Electric Boogaloo

Créé par: crowismydad
Équipe: 2020-21 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 23 août 2020
Publié: 23 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
57 500 000 $
14 750 000 $
52 750 000 $
21 500 000 $
22 300 000 $
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Zegras, Trevor
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Alexeyev, Alexander
  2. Hagelin, Carl
  3. Orlov, Dmitry
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
2.
WSH
  1. Ekman-Larsson, Oliver
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
3.
WSH
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Pánik, Richard
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de WSH
Logo de ARI
Logo de ANA
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de ARI
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 664 045 $419 749 $1 602 500 $1 835 955 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
894 167 $894 167 $
AG, C
RFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Capitals de Washington
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
G
UFA - 1
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
716 667 $716 667 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
791 667 $791 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 août 2020 à 18 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,159
Mentions "j'aime": 12,180
That OEL-Carlson pair would be a disaster in their own zone
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
23 août 2020 à 18 h 33
#2
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
That OEL-Carlson pair would be a disaster in their own zone


Good thing you have Barrie and Jensen to throw in instead!
23 août 2020 à 18 h 34
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,507
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: crowismydad
Good thing you have Barrie and Jensen to throw in instead!


Why not keep Krug in as well! I mean he only started like 60% in the ozone.
23 août 2020 à 18 h 35
#4
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,785
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
The ANA trade has the same issue as it had in the previous one - they won't include Zegras. He's the key piece for their rebuild and absolutely invaluable for the organisation. They don't need the pieces offered here. Your target player and team is wrong, even if there is value in the package to a nice extent.

ARI trade is still interesting.

I don't think CBJ needs any more wingers. They already have a surplus of them. Retain half of his salary and dump him to SJ who needs wingers for a 5th.

Gustafsson deal is lacking due to it's term. Same goes for Fast as well. Make them one year deals.
crowismydad et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
23 août 2020 à 18 h 37
#5
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: justaBoss
The ANA trade has the same issue as it had in the previous one - they won't include Zegras. He's the key piece for their rebuild and absolutely invaluable for the organisation. They don't need the pieces offered here. Your target player and team is wrong, even if there is value in the package to a nice extent.

ARI trade is still interesting.

I don't think CBJ needs any more wingers. They already have a surplus of them. Retain half of his salary and dump him to SJ who needs wingers for a 5th.

Gustafsson deal is lacking due to it's term. Same goes for Fast as well. Make them one year deals.


Who would you target instead of Zegras for a cheap impact franchise guy?
23 août 2020 à 18 h 42
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,785
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Quoting: crowismydad
Who would you target instead of Zegras for a cheap impact franchise guy?


Hard to say. These kind of players pretty much never get traded, because teams are not in favor of giving in with their top prospects. If Zegras becomes the franchise center of ANA as they've projected keeping him is just the wiser option.

Legit the best option via trade is probably a high end prospect that plays for a contending team already, because the team is likely more in favor to use that said player as a trade chip in order to strengthen their team further for their current run. Cody Glass or Alex Newhook are examples of such players. But it doesn't mean they'd get any cheaper...their team's might just be tad more in favor for moving the asset over a rebuilding team.
Konofish a aimé ceci.
23 août 2020 à 18 h 47
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: crowismydad
Who would you target instead of Zegras for a cheap impact franchise guy?


There are only a handful of guys like that traded every decade, and they cost a fortune. If we recognize someone as a franchise player on an attractive salary, their team almost definitely does too. :-)
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
23 août 2020 à 18 h 49
#8
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: justaBoss
Hard to say. These kind of players pretty much never get traded, because teams are not in favor of giving in with their top prospects. If Zegras becomes the franchise center of ANA as they've projected keeping him is just the wiser option.

Legit the best option via trade is probably a high end prospect that plays for a contending team already, because the team is likely more in favor to use that said player as a trade chip in order to strengthen their team further for their current run. Cody Glass or Alex Newhook are examples of such players. But it doesn't mean they'd get any cheaper...their team's might just be tad more in favor for moving the asset over a rebuilding team.


Agreed on Glass and Newhook and Krebs etc. The issue though is they just don't need defensive depth the same way Anaheim does, which is why they were targeted. I can't think of a package for Newhook or Krebs that works because both Colorado and Vegas are loaded at D and don't need a true PP QB, or a high tier defensive prospect the same way a rebuilding team does.
23 août 2020 à 18 h 56
#9
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,725
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
You would bleed 1000 goals per game with that D
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage