SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Considering Free Agents

Créé par: Leafs_Storm
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 9 juill. 2020
Publié: 9 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not going to go crazy and get a Pietrangelo (it won't happen), but taking a look at some possibilities.

I considered Chris Tanev, but I feel like he will end up staying in Vancouver, and his injury history is too concerning to give a long contract like he might want.
T.J. Brodie and Travis Hamonic are both likely UFAs off of Calgary, so they could use a Dman in Dermott in the trade, but Brodie's results have been sub-par away from Giordano, and personally I've never been too high on Hamonic (although I know the Leafs did try to trade for him and Brodie before in different trades). Ultimately, acquiring either of them would've forced a trade for Kerfoot as well, and for now I kept trades to a minimum.

Gudas has consistently driven play in his career, although primarily on the 3rd pair. Giving him top 4 minutes is a risk that he may not be up to the task, but a 2-year deal doesn't carry much long-term risk, and he can PK and provide physicality and a veteran presence that may help on the right side of the ice.

If people think I traded Johnsson or Dermott for too much in return, or to the wrong teams, they are both just cap dump trades ultimately, but they should both fetch at least a 2nd so I went for teams who could use a scoring forward and a young defenseman.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2750 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 550 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (ARI)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de ARI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de ARI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 409 783 $0 $400 000 $90 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 juill. 2020 à 12 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,579
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Gudas will get more $.
9 juill. 2020 à 12 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,309
Mentions "j'aime": 19,555
No from Calgary not moving our 2nd for another LD. Yes i know he is capable of playing the right side but not at the top 4 level we are looking for
9 juill. 2020 à 13 h 15
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,300
Mentions "j'aime": 25,205
I think that there are too many teams weak at RD for Gudas to get less than $3 million for 3 years.
9 juill. 2020 à 13 h 15
#4
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,052
Mentions "j'aime": 3,754
With a flat cap Gudas is too much of risk.
And trading Dermott is non starter for me.

Both Gudas and Jensen were really bad this year.


I am actually in favour of keeping Johnsson and trading Kerfoot but only if we can get another 3rd line C.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 36
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 219
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Trickster
With a flat cap Gudas is too much of risk.
And trading Dermott is non starter for me.

Both Gudas and Jensen were really bad this year.


I am actually in favour of keeping Johnsson and trading Kerfoot but only if we can get another 3rd line C.


I also would like to keep Dermott and see if he can move into the top 4 as a RD, and am bigger on Johnsson than Kerfoot. For this theoretical one though, I'm going with no new 3C emerging, so Johnsson out, and the idea was to get a RD so Dermott out made it work better.
Trickster a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 37
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 219
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
No from Calgary not moving our 2nd for another LD. Yes i know he is capable of playing the right side but not at the top 4 level we are looking for


Fair enough, I think he should get at least a 2nd; he's a 23 year old Dman who can play 2nd pair LD (we don't know about top-4 RD yet, but even if not), but if that's too much some other team would likely bite on it in a cap world if he's going for under 2M.
Ledge_And_Dairy a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 39
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,309
Mentions "j'aime": 19,555
Quoting: Leafs_Storm
Fair enough, I think he should get at least a 2nd; he's a 23 year old Dman who can play 2nd pair LD (we don't know about top-4 RD yet, but even if not), but if that's too much some other team would likely bite on it in a cap world if he's going for under 2M.


Flames already have Gio, Hanifin, and Valimaki who would be better suited for the top 2 LD spots and then Kylington who is about the same
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 39
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 219
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that there are too many teams weak at RD for Gudas to get less than $3 million for 3 years.


When we consider that only 5 teams finished 2019-2020 with over 5M in cap space, and nobody had planned for a flat cap (projections in February were for 84M as the lowest, with 88.4M as the highest for 2020-2021 per Bob McKenzie, the UFAs like Gudas are going to get squeezed. I don't doubt thta historically a team would give him at least 3x3, but he's coming off a down year, and teams are cap strapped. Taking a short contract where his physical presence will be hyped immensely by media, and maybe racking up some additional points on a high-flying offensive team, I could see him biting on a 1 or 2 year deal.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 41
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 219
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames already have Gio, Hanifin, and Valimaki who would be better suited for the top 2 LD spots and then Kylington who is about the same


Fair enough, in my head i just went, Brodie/Hamonic walking, Valimaki coming up, but Gio is also late 30s, they could use young Dmen. I personally was an advocate for acquiring Rasmus Andersson since about his AHL debut, but that ship has clearly sailed. With Kylington too, maybe that's not a fit, but then there's always a team looking for Defense.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage