SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

flat cap

Créé par: djsuperdock
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 4 juill. 2020
Publié: 4 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Goalie situation is obviously the #1 priority this offseason. I believe due to the flat cap and impending expansion draft, Murray will be dangled HARD. Next priority would be to clear more cap space via a team that has it, i.e. Ottawa. Then the Pens can sign RFAs and address the bottom pair on D. DeMelo would be a great add and the Pens could retain Riikola and have him and POJ play it out for the 3LD spot. Ruhwedel has also played OK the last couple of years. If Sheary is open to it, there is probably room for a one year contract (need to save room next year for Marino's next contract). If they could pull all this off, the Pens would be in a great spot to compete despite the flat cap.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
23 500 000 $
2950 000 $
2850 000 $
23 000 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
32 166 666 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
Seems expensive but IMO paying to get rid of Bjugstad and JJ is a MUST for the Pens to compete for championships for the next 2 years.
OTT
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. Hållander, Filip
  3. Johnson, Jack
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
2.
PIT
  1. Labanc, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
SJS
  1. Murray, Matt [Droits de RFA]
  2. Simon, Dominik [Droits de RFA]
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $78 680 174 $0 $1 062 500 $2 819 826 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
2 166 666 $2 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 juill. 2020 à 9 h 18
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
That's a stupid overpay.
Yojimbo a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2020 à 9 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,541
Mentions "j'aime": 6,451
Pretty much the right price to dump a contract look at the Toronto trade to dump Marleau they had to give up a 1st as well!
4 juill. 2020 à 9 h 51
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,485
Mentions "j'aime": 1,102
Count me in for the sens trade. 2 years of Bjugstad is manageable but 4 years of Johnson is... yikes. However, despite the health concerns, Hallander is a good prospect and together with a late first next year there’s enough value for Ottawa to take this on.
4 juill. 2020 à 10 h 7
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: AFOX10900
That's a stupid overpay.


Massive. Jugs can be traded without paying anything. Johnson may need a sweetener but not that much
Yojimbo et Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2020 à 10 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: Campabee
Pretty much the right price to dump a contract look at the Toronto trade to dump Marleau they had to give up a 1st as well!


Not a good comparison. Toronto needed to move cap in order to sign Marner. They also needed someone that would be willing to buy out Marleau, as opposed to playing him, so that he could sign in San Jose. They were 100% against the wall with the Marner cap need, and they needed someone to do just pay Marleau and walk away or Marleau may not have waived his NMC.

The Pens do not need the cap space like Toronto did, neither has a NMC, they don't need anyone to be willing to just buy the guy out.
4 juill. 2020 à 10 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: TheBoyDuddus
Count me in for the sens trade. 2 years of Bjugstad is manageable but 4 years of Johnson is... yikes. However, despite the health concerns, Hallander is a good prospect and together with a late first next year there’s enough value for Ottawa to take this on.


Yeah, but Bjugstad only has 1 year left and Johnson 3.

Plus, the Penguins coaching staff actually likes Johnson.
4 juill. 2020 à 10 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,541
Mentions "j'aime": 6,451
Quoting: Yojimbo
Not a good comparison. Toronto needed to move cap in order to sign Marner. They also needed someone that would be willing to buy out Marleau, as opposed to playing him, so that he could sign in San Jose. They were 100% against the wall with the Marner cap need, and they needed someone to do just pay Marleau and walk away or Marleau may not have waived his NMC.

The Pens do not need the cap space like Toronto did, neither has a NMC, they don't need anyone to be willing to just buy the guy out.


It may not be the same situation but the fact remains if you want to move a contract or in this case 2 your going to have to pony up a high level pick or two. Although I do agree that Bjugstad could be moved without a sweetener but JJ would absolutely have to have sweetener perhaps not a 1st per say but maybe a second or third
4 juill. 2020 à 10 h 53
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: Campabee
It may not be the same situation but the fact remains if you want to move a contract or in this case 2 your going to have to pony up a high level pick or two. Although I do agree that Bjugstad could be moved without a sweetener but JJ would absolutely have to have sweetener perhaps not a 1st per say but maybe a second or third


So, we went from Hallander and a 1st being the right price to just maybe a 3rd in a half of an hour...?

Good stuff.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2020 à 10 h 56
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,541
Mentions "j'aime": 6,451
Quoting: Yojimbo
So, we went from Hallander and a 1st being the right price to just maybe a 3rd in a half of an hour...?

Good stuff.


Hey you had a good argument that made sense.
Dan10900 et Yojimbo a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2020 à 11 h 57
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Sharks still say no
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2020 à 14 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 3
In a perfect world they hopefully do a one-for-one with Bjugstad for a bottom pair RHD with 1 year left on his contract, then find a partner to dump JJ, even if they have to retain a bit of salary, and hopefully, trade Murray for a potential top-6 RW. Its doable, but GMJR has his work cut out.
4 juill. 2020 à 16 h 31
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Campabee
Pretty much the right price to dump a contract look at the Toronto trade to dump Marleau they had to give up a 1st as well!


All of capfriendly is so sick and tired of this debunked logic.
Yeah it costs a 1st to move gudbranson too remember that old diddy!

Just delete this mess, it's awful.

Furthermore people can stop asking on Hållander They aren't trading him. He's probably their 3C next year.
4 juill. 2020 à 16 h 42
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,541
Mentions "j'aime": 6,451
Quoting: pharrow
All of capfriendly is so sick and tired of this debunked logic.
Yeah it costs a 1st to move gudbranson too remember that old diddy!

Just delete this mess, it's awful.

Furthermore people can stop asking on Hållander They aren't trading him. He's probably their 3C next year.


This isn't my thread! I never asked about Hallander! And I have no idea why your getting hostile towards me!
4 juill. 2020 à 20 h 29
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,485
Mentions "j'aime": 1,102
Quoting: Yojimbo
Yeah, but Bjugstad only has 1 year left and Johnson 3.

Plus, the Penguins coaching staff actually likes Johnson.


My bad, forgot the trade would be happening in the off-season. But regardless it comes down to appetite. How badly does Pittsburgh want to get rid of one year of Bjugstad and three years of Johnson? Toronto paid a 1st round pick last season to get rid of Marleau at 6.25M for one year. Pittsburgh is getting rid of 16M between the two of them over 3 years. If they really needed to, I could see this deal happening but again, that depends on how badly they need them gone.
4 juill. 2020 à 21 h 15
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: TheBoyDuddus
My bad, forgot the trade would be happening in the off-season. But regardless it comes down to appetite. How badly does Pittsburgh want to get rid of one year of Bjugstad and three years of Johnson? Toronto paid a 1st round pick last season to get rid of Marleau at 6.25M for one year. Pittsburgh is getting rid of 16M between the two of them over 3 years. If they really needed to, I could see this deal happening but again, that depends on how badly they need them gone.


I already explained that the Toronto/Marleau comparison doesn't hold water.

If Bjugstad is healthy he is actually rather decent, if hurt he is on LTIR.
The Pens coaches actually like Johnson.
Therefore, not badly at all.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage