Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Rakell for Lehkonen

Créé par: tegith
Publié: 12 jun à 8 h 40
Plafond salarial: 81 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 41/186 (22%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a rempli les différents critères exigés par le registraire central de la LNH.

Anaheim DucksAnaheim Ducks

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Rakell, RickardDucks d'AnaheimLNH-835 307 $111---65152742
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Lehkonen, ArtturiCanadiens de MontréalLNH50%264 516 $111---70131427
Hillis, CameronExempté du ballottageCanadiens de MontréalMineures-0 $011---0000
Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (Chicago BlackhawksCHI)------------
Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (Montreal CanadiensMTL)------------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial2 151 710 $2148634611
Variation570 791 $011020
Final2 722 501 $ (↑)2149 (↑)64 (↑)48 (↑)11-2-130

Montreal CanadiensMontreal Canadiens

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Lehkonen, ArtturiCanadiens de MontréalLNH50%264 516 $111---70131427
Hillis, CameronExempté du ballottageCanadiens de MontréalMineures-0 $011---0000
Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (Chicago BlackhawksCHI)------------
Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (Montreal CanadiensMTL)------------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Rakell, RickardDucks d'AnaheimLNH-835 307 $111---65152742
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial6 181 191 $21456131019
Variation-570 791 $0-1-10-20
Final5 610 400 $ (↓)2144 (↓)60 (↓)38 (↓)1921315
12 jun à 8 h 59
#1
Oui non grille-pain
Rejoint: fév 2017
Messages: 5,941
Mentions "j'aime": 1,308
Rakell is a solid player on an even better contract. I think MTL takes that and runs.
keep_ups12, BDIBIT et HabsForEver a aimé ceci.
12 jun à 9 h 20
#2
2018 Canucks
Rejoint: jan 2017
Messages: 541
Mentions "j'aime": 178
What is the motivation here for the Ducks?
keep_ups12, Salzy et BDIBIT a aimé ceci.
12 jun à 9 h 23
#3
NoMansonMurphyDumba
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 3,512
Mentions "j'aime": 1,023
LOL Easy no from ducks. Rakell is gonna be traded for a top 4 RH defenseman. Not scraps
Salzy, MaxDomi13 et HabsForEver a aimé ceci.
12 jun à 9 h 42
#4
Rejoint: nov 2018
Messages: 1,294
Mentions "j'aime": 1,044
Unless its Lehko, Brook and the 2020 first this is the easiest pass of Bob Murrays life

Quoting: EmpressKayla
Rakell is a solid player on an even better contract. I think MTL takes that and runs.


This would never even be considered by ANA
EmpressKayla a aimé ceci.
12 jun à 13 h 18
#5
Fanboys make bad Gms
Rejoint: déc 2018
Messages: 1,069
Mentions "j'aime": 445
I was gonna 100% agree with the people above. Then I looked into both prospects. What Ana is looking for as far as base roster goes is not this package, but Ana is hard into a rebuild and they're not fixing this in one year. I like both the prospects numbers, a 2 and a 3 aren't garbage picks and Rakell is only on two years left. He's probably going to get deadlined for a pile like this anyway at some point. What Ana wants for Rakell doesn't really exist. Maybe Dumba but I think other teams can offer more than Rakell for Dumba. If Ana shops around and doesn't see the D they're looking for this is a very strong fall back. Maybe they finagle the 3 into another 2 but that's semantics but I'm gonna go crazy here and say deal from both sides.
12 jun à 14 h 45
#6
Good Stick Lehky
Rejoint: jun 2017
Messages: 5,250
Mentions "j'aime": 2,090
What on earth?
MaxDomi13 a aimé ceci.
12 jun à 21 h 38
#7
AMD81
Rejoint: déc 2019
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 4
I don't see how Anaheim even tries to say anything remotely close to a "yes" on this trade. Lehkonen is a solid player, but Rakell has a brighter future and is a better player. I get the picks and prospects, but a mid-tier prospect, a 2 and a 3? I think ANA would ask for a 1st and a better prospect, plus Lehkonen if ANA wants to move Rakell. And I doubt they even want to do that.
12 jun à 22 h 50
#8
2018 Canucks
Rejoint: jan 2017
Messages: 541
Mentions "j'aime": 178
Quoting: reelkena
I was gonna 100% agree with the people above. Then I looked into both prospects. What Ana is looking for as far as base roster goes is not this package, but Ana is hard into a rebuild and they're not fixing this in one year. I like both the prospects numbers, a 2 and a 3 aren't garbage picks and Rakell is only on two years left. He's probably going to get deadlined for a pile like this anyway at some point. What Ana wants for Rakell doesn't really exist. Maybe Dumba but I think other teams can offer more than Rakell for Dumba. If Ana shops around and doesn't see the D they're looking for this is a very strong fall back. Maybe they finagle the 3 into another 2 but that's semantics but I'm gonna go crazy here and say deal from both sides.


On 2nd & 3rd rounders...
They are good picks to have but a low chance of being NHLers of much significance. Mid 6 to bottom 6 F’s is a realistic hope. Top 4 D maybe or more likely bottom pairing. More picks though can better the chance to find a gem. Overall more likely to be role/depth players.
12 jun à 23 h 01
#9
Jarlotti
Rejoint: déc 2019
Messages: 367
Mentions "j'aime": 79
Ducks say no
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage