SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is this a realistic offseason for the Hawks

Créé par: mac2033
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 12 mai 2020
Publié: 12 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Lot of x-factors going into this offseason. Potentially a new GM, compliance buyouts. If Shaw isn't kept on LTIR there's even less money to re-sign Strome, Kubalik, Crawford, Caggiula, maybe Koekkoek. There's an obvious need to address defense, but if Stan is still at the helm, I hope he'd be conservative in the trade market. That said, what does/can this team do to improve? Hope the young stars take strides in their development? Overpay for a UFA like Hoffman or Hall? Because there's a desire from my end to not do anything stupid, but roll out this team again and once again they're in the basement of the central. What would y'all do as new GM of the Hawks?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
24 500 000 $
34 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Mitchell, Ian
3925 000 $
Transactions
CHI
ANA
  1. Seabrook, Brent (2 292 812 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $71 012 243 $1 090 244 $4 200 000 $10 487 757 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Mitchell, Ian
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 mai 2020 à 17 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
They're probably going to buyout Maatta and Smith. A trade that's been posted frequently on here is Strome for Brodin straight up, and I think that would be a major help in both the short term and long term. Next year will probably be another down year, hopefully they can get another top 10 pick and then gear up to make the playoffs in 2022.
mac2033 et CFMan a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2020 à 17 h 22
#2
Démarrer sujet
FireStan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 139
Mentions "j'aime": 29
I understand the Smith buyout, but haven't understood the Maatta hate. He was actually pretty solid when paired with Koekkoek, albeit playing third line minutes. Bringing in Brodin would obviously change that and Maatta doesn't have a cheap buyout option.
12 mai 2020 à 17 h 24
#3
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,054
Mentions "j'aime": 10,483
Quoting: mac2033
I understand the Smith buyout, but haven't understood the Maatta hate. He was actually pretty solid when paired with Koekkoek, albeit playing third line minutes. Bringing in Brodin would obviously change that and Maatta doesn't have a cheap buyout option.


The Maatta option is a last resort option. He should have trade value, but let's pretend for a second he didn't (which is incorrect) he has a VERY team friendly buyout that can save $3.5M a year.
mac2033 et Petrock83 a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2020 à 17 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 841
Mentions "j'aime": 739
Quoting: Petrock83
They're probably going to buyout Maatta and Smith. A trade that's been posted frequently on here is Strome for Brodin straight up, and I think that would be a major help in both the short term and long term. Next year will probably be another down year, hopefully they can get another top 10 pick and then gear up to make the playoffs in 2022.


If next year is a down year (I think it will be), Hawks should avoid buyouts at all costs so those cap hits don't follow for when they are making a push. Maatta has some value, and hawks should be capable of eating Smith's last year.
12 mai 2020 à 17 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: TheJonSnow
If next year is a down year (I think it will be), Hawks should avoid buyouts at all costs so those cap hits don't follow for when they are making a push. Maatta has some value, and hawks should be capable of eating Smith's last year.


Depends on the contracts of Kubalik/Strome/Crawford and health status of Shaw/De Haan/Seabrook. I think they may be able to eat Smith's contract, but they might not be able to if all three guys come back from injury and they sign all three of the FAs to fair contracts.
12 mai 2020 à 17 h 50
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,279
Mentions "j'aime": 2,238
I think if Shaw comes back then one of him or Caggiula gets traded. We dont two concussion risks on this team, only one
mac2033 et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2020 à 17 h 51
#7
Démarrer sujet
FireStan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 139
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: TheJonSnow
If next year is a down year (I think it will be), Hawks should avoid buyouts at all costs so those cap hits don't follow for when they are making a push. Maatta has some value, and hawks should be capable of eating Smith's last year.


I would like there to be an obvious sign or even an admission that the team is going to suck this year by not making short-sighted trades and UFA signings and prepare for '21-22. I think the Seabrook contract is the only one you buyout. 6.785 on the books for 4 years or 2.292 for 8.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2020 à 17 h 53
#8
Démarrer sujet
FireStan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 139
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: Petrock83
Depends on the contracts of Kubalik/Strome/Crawford and health status of Shaw/De Haan/Seabrook. I think they may be able to eat Smith's contract, but they might not be able to if all three guys come back from injury and they sign all three of the FAs to fair contracts.


If Seabrook and Shaw are back, Caggiula's rights are getting traded. No room for him if they plan on Kubalik and Strome being a part of the future.
12 mai 2020 à 18 h 20
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,388
Mentions "j'aime": 26,137
Quoting: mac2033
I would like there to be an obvious sign or even an admission that the team is going to suck this year by not making short-sighted trades and UFA signings and prepare for '21-22. I think the Seabrook contract is the only one you buyout. 6.785 on the books for 4 years or 2.292 for 8.


So do I understand correctly that you are buying Seabrook out?
12 mai 2020 à 20 h 30
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,888
Mentions "j'aime": 6,422
Quoting: OldNYIfan
So do I understand correctly that you are buying Seabrook out?


Seabrooks contract is buy out proof. Hawks barely save anything on a buy out according to the buy out calculator on here.
12 mai 2020 à 20 h 58
#11
Démarrer sujet
FireStan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 139
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
Seabrooks contract is buy out proof. Hawks barely save anything on a buy out according to the buy out calculator on here.


Compliance buyouts granted previously were 2/3rd the contract paid out over 2x the length of time. So 4.5mil saved for 4 years, 2.292mil on the books for 8 years. I'd do that.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2020 à 22 h 3
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,888
Mentions "j'aime": 6,422
Quoting: mac2033
Compliance buyouts granted previously were 2/3rd the contract paid out over 2x the length of time. So 4.5mil saved for 4 years, 2.292mil on the books for 8 years. I'd do that.


Didn't realize you were talking about a CBO. In that case yeah I agree
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage