SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Toronto Maple Leafs 2020

Créé par: Leafsfan416
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 30 avr. 2020
Publié: 30 avr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Levio probably might not want to come back but I always liked him. Maybe a better fit with Keefe behind the bench.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 756 400 $
2900 000 $
21 800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
1700 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
21 305 600 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Domi, Max [Droits de RFA]
  2. Juulsen, Noah [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
2.
3.
TOR
  1. Abramov, Vitaly
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
OTT
  1. Bracco, Jeremy [Droits de RFA]
  2. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CBJ
Logo de MTL
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 432 750 $0 $0 $2 067 250 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 756 400 $5 756 400 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
1 305 600 $1 305 600 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 7
#1
FEKYJEEZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 8
I think that Domi trade is pretty fair, but I don't see why MB would trade Domi to a same division team.
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 9
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: MTLGenius
I think that Domi trade is pretty fair, but I don't see why MB would trade Domi to a same division team.


100 percent, probably right. Just trying something new.
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,214
Mentions "j'aime": 5,077
I'd be 100% happy if Dubas was able to pull off these moves
Leafsfan416 a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 13
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,079
Mentions "j'aime": 12,097
Given where Ottawa's LD side is, I don't think I'd give a 2nd for Dermott, and I'd rather have Abramov than Bracco. Bracco is a perimeter player, and Abramov isn't afraid to go to the net, or battle down low.
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 15
#5
Saskoiler for now
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,318
Mentions "j'aime": 9,237
Too much for Domi.
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 18
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Given where Ottawa's LD side is, I don't think I'd give a 2nd for Dermott, and I'd rather have Abramov than Bracco. Bracco is a perimeter player, and Abramov isn't afraid to go to the net, or battle down low.




Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Given where Ottawa's LD side is, I don't think I'd give a 2nd for Dermott, and I'd rather have Abramov than Bracco. Bracco is a perimeter player, and Abramov isn't afraid to go to the net, or battle down low.


I think Dermott would be an upgrade over Mike Rielly, could take his spot. IMO
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 19
#7
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: Saskleaf
Too much for Domi.


Cool, np. How should it look?
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 22
#8
Saskoiler for now
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,318
Mentions "j'aime": 9,237
Take out Johnsson. I love Domi but he’s not as good as Nylander.
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 22
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,079
Mentions "j'aime": 12,097
Quoting: Leafsfan416
I think Dermott would be an upgrade over Mike Rielly, could take his spot. IMO


Mike Reilly is the 7th D. Sens left side next year is Chabot and either Wolanin-Brannstrom or Wolanin-Borowiecki. If it's Branny, I'd go with the young blue chip prospect over Dermott, if it's Boro, I think Borowiecki brings more to the table defensively.
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 32
#10
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Mike Reilly is the 7th D. Sens left side next year is Chabot and either Wolanin-Brannstrom or Wolanin-Borowiecki. If it's Branny, I'd go with the young blue chip prospect over Dermott, if it's Boro, I think Borowiecki brings more to the table defensively.


Cool, that makes sense. I have to think they will trade 1 or two of the picks for current roster players. Whoever that might be.
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 32
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 101
Mentions "j'aime": 34
Quoting: Saskleaf
Take out Johnsson. I love Domi but he’s not as good as Nylander.


nowhere close
30 avr. 2020 à 10 h 34
#12
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: Saskleaf
Take out Johnsson. I love Domi but he’s not as good as Nylander.


Ok, so Nylander for Domi, Juulsen, 3 round pick
30 avr. 2020 à 11 h 46
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 219
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Juulsen has been unable to play hockey due to injury for a while. We have no idea right now if he'll ever be capable in the NHL, let alone in the top 4. Domi is a worse player than Nylander. You are trading one player for somebody worse, and another player (I understand the cap reasons) for someone who may never return to the NHL in a non-bottom pair capacity.

I understand the appeal of Manson, but outside of one season, he doesn't get any points. If all we need is a guy to play defense with Muzzin, Holl already makes that pair work well. Physicality is nice, but trading for a guy just because he hits more while doubling the cap hit, and sacrificing a 2nd round pick and a 20 year old prospect seems like a bad trade. Rowney is the kind of guy you can get easily in FA.

I quite like Abramov, and if you assume Sandin makes the roster, and there's a cheap defense signing available like Tim Heed, i get the trade, even if it does seem expensive considering NHL experience at this point.

I love the idea of bringing back Leivo, but no idea what the cap hit would be. He's been on pace for 35-45 points both seasons in the Middle 6 with Vancouver, which is more than 1.3M by a good amount, but he also has had injuries.

Overall, If you want to ship off Johnsson/Dermott for cap help, and supplement another RD, I get it, but why would we get rid of Willy for Domi, and Juulsen is in no way a better prospect than Liljegren right now. If you were set on Manson (who has had his price vaulted exponentially by media like Dreger), you could try Johnsson, Holl, Dermott in some form of package, which stillseems insane. Then the forwards are the same but you keep Willy, and you still have Manson but you have Liljegren instead of Juulsen.
30 avr. 2020 à 12 h 12
#14
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: Leafs_Storm
Juulsen has been unable to play hockey due to injury for a while. We have no idea right now if he'll ever be capable in the NHL, let alone in the top 4. Domi is a worse player than Nylander. You are trading one player for somebody worse, and another player (I understand the cap reasons) for someone who may never return to the NHL in a non-bottom pair capacity.

I understand the appeal of Manson, but outside of one season, he doesn't get any points. If all we need is a guy to play defense with Muzzin, Holl already makes that pair work well. Physicality is nice, but trading for a guy just because he hits more while doubling the cap hit, and sacrificing a 2nd round pick and a 20 year old prospect seems like a bad trade. Rowney is the kind of guy you can get easily in FA.

I quite like Abramov, and if you assume Sandin makes the roster, and there's a cheap defense signing available like Tim Heed, i get the trade, even if it does seem expensive considering NHL experience at this point.

I love the idea of bringing back Leivo, but no idea what the cap hit would be. He's been on pace for 35-45 points both seasons in the Middle 6 with Vancouver, which is more than 1.3M by a good amount, but he also has had injuries.

Overall, If you want to ship off Johnsson/Dermott for cap help, and supplement another RD, I get it, but why would we get rid of Willy for Domi, and Juulsen is in no way a better prospect than Liljegren right now. If you were set on Manson (who has had his price vaulted exponentially by media like Dreger), you could try Johnsson, Holl, Dermott in some form of package, which stillseems insane. Then the forwards are the same but you keep Willy, and you still have Manson but you have Liljegren instead of Juulsen.


https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/canadiens-noah-juulsen-feeling-really-good-ready-resume-nhl-career/ (based of this, he is back healthy. But, yes there is risk)

https://www.hockey-reference.com/play-index/pcomp_finder.cgi?request=1&match=1&player1_hint=Max+Domi&player1_select=Max+Domi&player1=domima01&idx=players&player2_hint=William+Nylander&player2_select=William+Nylander&player2=nylanwi01&idx=players

I'm guessing when you say Domi is a worse player than Nylander, that's just your opinion. Which is cool, we are entitled to our own, but the numbers would suggest otherwise. Even more so when Nylander has played almost he's entire career when Matthews. Yes, Nylander held out and missed time, but I like the toughness and skill Domi adds and he has never played with anyone that talented. Agree the Manson deal doesn't need to happen. Just like the player. Appreciate the feedback.
5 mai 2020 à 20 h 34
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 219
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Leafsfan416
https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/canadiens-noah-juulsen-feeling-really-good-ready-resume-nhl-career/ (based of this, he is back healthy. But, yes there is risk)

https://www.hockey-reference.com/play-index/pcomp_finder.cgi?request=1&match=1&player1_hint=Max+Domi&player1_select=Max+Domi&player1=domima01&idx=players&player2_hint=William+Nylander&player2_select=William+Nylander&player2=nylanwi01&idx=players

I'm guessing when you say Domi is a worse player than Nylander, that's just your opinion. Which is cool, we are entitled to our own, but the numbers would suggest otherwise. Even more so when Nylander has played almost he's entire career when Matthews. Yes, Nylander held out and missed time, but I like the toughness and skill Domi adds and he has never played with anyone that talented. Agree the Manson deal doesn't need to happen. Just like the player. Appreciate the feedback.


Actually, I would say the numbers point out Nylander being a significantly better player. His play-driving ability is elite. His biggest weakness is his inability to convert on the chances he creates at a high level, but for the first time in his career, he was converting at an expected rate and it was putting him on pace for 35+ goals. This is not meant to disparage Domi, but he had his career season last year for 75 points when Nylander had the holdout/awful season. This year he had 44 points in 71 games. Domi has only cracked 60 points the one time, which Nylander did his rookie and sophomore season, and was only 1 point away from doing this year before the season was suspended.

For example, as seen here https://hockeyviz.com/player/domixma95/MTL/1920 Domi has positive effects offensively with neutral defensive impacts, but thats actually worse both offensively and defensively than montreal without him on the ice. On the other hand, he is a good PP player. Willy was a negative on defense https://hockeyviz.com/player/nylanwi96/TOR/1920 but only 1% worse than the team average, while he impacted offense an insane amount.

Willy's defensive zone play has always left something to be desired, but his neutral zone play, both in driving the puck up the ice, and in disrupting the opposition to take pucks away, is arguably the most elite part of his game. The fact that he led the NHL in shots from the slot this year, and tied for the lead in goals from there is just showing his dominance around the ice. Yes, he has elite linemates that Domi has never had, and domi does bring that agitator game that willy doesn't, but we know for a fact that Willy works very well in tandem with Matthews, and seems to be a great fit next to Tavares. Domi likely would too, but I'd rather keep the guy who's specialty is zone transition and slot shots despite being a playmaker, rather than get a guy who is shown in the analytics to be worse because of the agitator element.

I acknowledge what you shared with hockeyref's point shares, but the thing about point share is that it assumes equal amounts of goals and talent. Some players are better shooters, it results in your team scoring more, and some drive the net more like Willy has shown to do. Also, it shows offensive/defensive impact, but and I don't claim to know what goes into that model, but as Willy is one of the best transition players in the NHL, and the best one that the Leafs have (marner is 2nd on the team in that regard, also elite), i wouldn't get rid of that.

In the end, I understand why you want to move Willy for Domi, the agitator element is useful, and he brings an element of bite that our top six has lacked without kadri; I just wouldn't make the trade myself.
6 mai 2020 à 10 h 44
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 6,103
Mentions "j'aime": 2,240
Don't see Montreal making that trade. Nylander is a tad bit overpaid and I think they could get Domi on a better contract than him. Domi also brings some grit, something we are lacking.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage