Modifié 18 févr. 2020 à 19 h 47
Quoting: NHLfan10506
2+2 does = 4. Foote still better than Studnicka.
OHL vs WHL (more offense in Ontario League).
NHL equivalent weights:
https://twitter.com/mannyelk/status/1014216462695878658
1. NHL 1.00
34. OHL 0.1577
35. WHL 0.1549
So even factoring league:
Foote: 1.22 x 0.1549 = 0.189 NHL pt/gm in D+1 season
Studnicka 1.09 x 0.1577 = 0.172 NHL pt/gm in D+1 season
Still has Foote favored. Again, I'm not saying one is clearly better than the other. I'm saying they're the same tier. Which means they carry about the same weight in a trade. If you're trying to make an argument that one is clearly head and shoulders better than the other, usually the one drafted higher and putting up better numbers at the same age would be the rational choice...but when we're talking Bruins or Toronto prospects the conversation is rarely rational.
Or we can use Madden
NCAA: 0.1711
Studnicka D+ 2 = 1.38 pt/gm
Madden D+2 = 1.37 pt/gm
1.38 x 0.1577 = .218 pt/gm for Studnicka in D+2
1.37 x 0.1711 = .234 pt/gm for Madden in D+2
Madden wins out. I'm just not sure how the 2+2 =4 guy isn't actually doing the math on his own player relative to the field.