Quoting: Eli
Oh, you haven't even seen him play, and you want to move him to forward? Interesting. Might work... Lewington's one of the toughest defenders in the AHL and you can't have him.
How about Nylander for Oshie, 2nd, Djoos? I think that gets Tor a little bit of cap breathing room, turning Nylander's 7M hit into two players off a recent championship squad. Djoos played all but the first game of the 2018 playoffs for Washington at 3RD. On most teams that would give him an audition at 2RD, but Washington traded for Jensen and Gudas to fix their PK and get a little bit tougher. You asked for a controllable 2RD, and after playing half a year in the AHL, I think Djoos would have to jump at an offer around 2x1.5M, or 3x2M. He started last year with a broken leg, came back too early, but towards the end he got seven points in 15 games, playing third pair with Siegenthaler. To me that says top four puck mover, and maybe 2nd power play point.
First thing you have to learn is small sample sizes mean **** all. Regardless of any player you want to look at, 2 game or 15 game, sample sizes are simply not good enough, especially if you're basing it on point production.
this issue was you tossing around lewington's P/60 in a 2 game sample size, on a player that is clearly a fringe NHLer at the age of 25. Djoos is a 3rd pairing D as well. Cherry picking some 15 game sample size to say "that's a 2nd pair RD" is insane.
Oshie as the centrepiece of the deal does not work. He's 32 years old, on the wrong side of the aging curve and his contract takes him to 37 years old.
It's highly doubtful the leafs will trade nylander, but if they do it would look something like the Jones - Johanssen trade. Similar age, similar pedigree, not a bunch of crap thrown on to an declining asset like Oshie.
We can disagree on the oshie vs nylander thing, but please do not base any future narratives you ever make off 2 game sample sizes. You can find some random obscure player that probably looks like Gretzky on a 2 game sample size.