Quoting: RobbStark03
One last thing, since you claim I am ignoring your "logic"...
Marleau had a Salary of $4.250M. Cap hit of $6M. Winger (Something the Leafs have plenty of). Last year had 37 points (declining).
It stands to reason Leafs didn't need/want him anymore, due to his position and production (unlike Weber). His salary meant that Cap Floor teams didn't want him (unlike Weber's contract style). Marleau had a FULL MOVE CLAUSE which means he could reject any and all trades or demotions to anywhere (unlike Weber who has no NMC or NTC).
For the last time, Weber's contract is not only not bad, but is a huge asset to Cap Floor teams in a few years, and his contract alone could tank the Preds team in his final 2 years. You aren't comprehending that Weber's contract isn't that same as __________ (insert old player here) contract. At any point between now and the final year of his contract, Weber can be traded easily.
I look forward to your supreme "logic" and ignoring it going forward. I am well aware of all your claims and how valueless this debate has been.
I lied, one more thing.
Cap floor teams are going to want to take on Weber's deal. Which cap floor teams? Because there are maybe 6 teams that could currently fit his contract. There are even more teams that are over the cap but are utilizing LTIR to gain enough space. (TO being chief among them) Columbus, has space, but why would they want Weber? They have other players that'll need contracts down the line and won't want to have to worry about having an 40 year old Weber who doesn't want to retire. (That absolutely could happen)
Ottawa? Well they also have Bobby Ryan who is a cap anchor, they're also going to be wanting space in the next 3-4 years to pay for young guys who'll become their new core. Taking on 8 million for the next 6 years doesn't make sense to them. Who else? Arizona? They are against the cap. What about teams heading into rebuilds? LA? They have cap issues and a plethora of high priced vets that they'd want to move out not move another one in.
Its easy to say nonsense on here. Its harder to do the work into finding out if that is nonsense.
So do us all a favour and look at the cap situations of the teams you want to trade someone to. Then think about all the variables that come into play year over year, then try to understand when there are moments a team would be considering making a big move and then after all of that, realize that Weber is in fact incredibly hard to move now and its only going to get harder. Same with Price. You have 2 high priced aging vets who have more term than most players in the NHL. Regardless of how well they may be doing, the chances of them declining far outweigh the chances that they'll keep it up. That risk is way too great and it increases year over year. In 3 years Montreal is going to be offering Suzuki for anyone who is willing to take on Weber. That probably won't happen, but its more likely than Dubas wanting to handcuff himself by having a declining asset with an 8 million dollar cap hit.