SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Without a signing over 5 mil

Créé par: BCAPP
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 29 sept. 2019
Publié: 29 sept. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 450 000 $
2750 000 $
32 500 000 $
2800 000 $
2750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
54 500 000 $
43 250 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2384 000 000 $83 900 616 $0 $400 000 $99 384 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
737 500 $737 500 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 sept. 2019 à 14 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 137
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Modifié 29 sept. 2019 à 15 h 11
Given cap constraints, Hyman,'s skill set is just far too limited and infinitely better served by x3 players @$750k...or $ spent on Leafs blueline roster (whether those you've proposed or others?). We know what Hyman can do. In '20-21' he will be 28 going on 29 and possesses zero growth potential. Give it up! Under limits resulting from salary payouts to others, Leafs can't afford Hyman's $2.25m sticker price. (You think he is worth +/- Moore, Timashov & Petan 'combined' ???)
Korshkov has more upside than many of the bench players that you've identified here. After <9 games in '19, and likely send down to Marlies for more TOI/seasoning, I could see him as a late season call up in '20..and likely full time roster player in '20-'21.
Sadly, imo, Liljgren has simply just not 'shown it' (which is not necessarily bad for a D)...but his aversion to hitting and to refraining from getting involved when his fellow teammates are roughed-up suggests that he should be given first pairing exposure on Marlies this year to assess whether he has sufficient merit for '20-'21 NHL call up.
Just saying.
29 sept. 2019 à 15 h 20
#2
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,095
Mentions "j'aime": 3,781
I like this but I feel someone has to go for cap reasons in 2019 and dont feel that is Ceci, Barrie or Muzzin.
oneX et borealis a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2019 à 15 h 34
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 2,669
Quoting: Trickster
I like this but I feel someone has to go for cap reasons in 2019 and dont feel that is Ceci, Barrie or Muzzin.


People don't like the idea of trading Hyman (I suggested Kapanen) in order to free up some cap space in future years.
What's not being taken into account is when Rielly and Andersen are set to be UFAs and even more money will be needed for at least one of them.
Trickster a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2019 à 15 h 45
#4
Frolik Deez Nutz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 438
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Hamonic specifically asked for a trade to leave the east coast and move to the west coast. Why would he sign in Toronto lol

They will have a chance at signing Brodie though.
29 sept. 2019 à 20 h 2
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,383
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: borealis
Given cap constraints, Hyman,'s skill set is just far too limited and infinitely better served by x3 players @$750k...or $ spent on Leafs blueline roster (whether those you've proposed or others?). We know what Hyman can do. In '20-21' he will be 28 going on 29 and possesses zero growth potential. Give it up! Under limits resulting from salary payouts to others, Leafs can't afford Hyman's $2.25m sticker price. (You think he is worth +/- Moore, Timashov & Petan 'combined' ???)
Korshkov has more upside than many of the bench players that you've identified here. After <9 games in '19, and likely send down to Marlies for more TOI/seasoning, I could see him as a late season call up in '20..and likely full time roster player in '20-'21.
Sadly, imo, Liljgren has simply just not 'shown it' (which is not necessarily bad for a D)...but his aversion to hitting and to refraining from getting involved when his fellow teammates are roughed-up suggests that he should be given first pairing exposure on Marlies this year to assess whether he has sufficient merit for '20-'21 NHL call up.
Just saying.


Quoting: Trickster
I like this but I feel someone has to go for cap reasons in 2019 and dont feel that is Ceci, Barrie or Muzzin.


Quoting: oneX
People don't like the idea of trading Hyman (I suggested Kapanen) in order to free up some cap space in future years.
What's not being taken into account is when Rielly and Andersen are set to be UFAs and even more money will be needed for at least one of them.


So I actually had a trade of hyman for Mayfield and there was enough cap space left over that I cancelled it and signed demelo
borealis a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2019 à 20 h 7
#6
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,095
Mentions "j'aime": 3,781
Quoting: BCAPP
So I actually had a trade of hyman for Mayfield and there was enough cap space left over that I cancelled it and signed demelo


@Random2152

Demelo or Mayfield?
borealis a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2019 à 20 h 10
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 137
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: oneX
People don't like the idea of trading Hyman (I suggested Kapanen) in order to free up some cap space in future years.
What's not being taken into account is when Rielly and Andersen are set to be UFAs and even more money will be needed for at least one of them.


Exactly. Hyman has more trade value now than he will have in 12-18mos time.
BCAPP a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2019 à 20 h 19
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 137
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Modifié 29 sept. 2019 à 21 h 40
Quoting: Trickster
@Random2152

Demelo or Mayfield?


Yes...thought your logic for Hyman trade was 'inspired'. Ottawa w/ DJ and Isles w/Lou might also be targets for Dubas trade discussions(?). Hyman is known commodity to both as they're both familiar with his work ethic. Imo Leafs have a fully subscribed payroll for forwards and need to manage short/medium $$ available for blueline and for goaltending. They have eight players (including five D-men) poised to hit the UFA market next July.
29 sept. 2019 à 20 h 53
#9
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 5,703
Quoting: Trickster
@Random2152

Demelo or Mayfield?


Skill wise probably Mayfield by a small margin, but I wouldn't give up more than a mid pick and an AHL level guy for either.

And I wouldn't pay demelo that absurd contract either.
29 sept. 2019 à 21 h 45
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,383
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Random2152
Skill wise probably Mayfield by a small margin, but I wouldn't give up more than a mid pick and an AHL level guy for either.

And I wouldn't pay demelo that absurd contract either.


3.25 million is the going rate for a non ELC #4 defenseman. I haven't watched him all that much but his stats and minutes seem to comfortably make him a decent #4. What do you have against him? Im interested
Trickster a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2019 à 23 h 7
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 137
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: BCAPP
3.25 million is the going rate for a non ELC #4 defenseman. I haven't watched him all that much but his stats and minutes seem to comfortably make him a decent #4. What do you have against him? Im interested


As you know, your $3.25m is near to current Brandon Montour number. I'd prefer Montour.
That said, imo, Dubas' #1 priority should be to seek to extend Muzzin (who will undoubtedly be seeking term?) at a number as near as possible to his existing $4m.
29 sept. 2019 à 23 h 15
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,383
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: borealis
As you know, your $3.25m is near to current Brandon Montour number. I'd prefer Montour.
That said, imo, Dubas' #1 priority should be to seek to extend Muzzin (who will undoubtedly be seeking term?) at a number as near as possible to his existing $4m.


Sure you can always find a bargain to compare too. But signing a UFA dman on the open market who can play 20+ minutes competently will count.

Muzzin scares me to resign because he's arguably been a borderline low end #1 and easily #2 defenseman so he'll want to be paid as such, BUT he'll be 31 when his new contract starts. He can decline fast. I'm very leery of commuting to him.
Trickster a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2019 à 23 h 36
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 137
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: BCAPP
Sure you can always find a bargain to compare too. But signing a UFA dman on the open market who can play 20+ minutes competently will count.

Muzzin scares me to resign because he's arguably been a borderline low end #1 and easily #2 defenseman so he'll want to be paid as such, BUT he'll be 31 when his new contract starts. He can decline fast. I'm very leery of commuting to him.


Agreed. There is certainly risk...but he'll be seeking term...so maybe he can be had for5 years @ $5m.
29 sept. 2019 à 23 h 42
#14
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 5,703
Quoting: BCAPP
3.25 million is the going rate for a non ELC #4 defenseman. I haven't watched him all that much but his stats and minutes seem to comfortably make him a decent #4. What do you have against him? Im interested


He isn't a number 4. His basic counting stats are inflated due to his situation as being chabots partner in Ottawa. Look under the hood to see the truth. He is a 3rd pairing defender. To pay a guy like that, that kind of money is absurd.
30 sept. 2019 à 1 h 43
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 2,669
Quoting: Random2152
He isn't a number 4. His basic counting stats are inflated due to his situation as being chabots partner in Ottawa. Look under the hood to see the truth. He is a 3rd pairing defender. To pay a guy like that, that kind of money is absurd.


So his numbers don't look good in Ottawa, isn't that a consideration too? Just like Ceci, he may look better in other organizations?

Sorry, just a question in general.
Trickster a aimé ceci.
30 sept. 2019 à 11 h 19
#16
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 5,703
Quoting: oneX
So his numbers don't look good in Ottawa, isn't that a consideration too? Just like Ceci, he may look better in other organizations?

Sorry, just a question in general.


Most advanced stats are adjusted to provide an even playing field. The usual chart I post like that is RAPM which literally means 'Regularised Adjusted Plus Minus'
And even so I don't hate Demelo as a 3rd pairing energy guy. In fact I think he is very good in that role with the right partner, but to give him a contract like in this AGM and to say he has any real trade value or top 4 potential is nuts.
oneX a aimé ceci.
30 sept. 2019 à 13 h 4
#17
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,095
Mentions "j'aime": 3,781
Quoting: Random2152
Most advanced stats are adjusted to provide an even playing field. The usual chart I post like that is RAPM which literally means 'Regularised Adjusted Plus Minus'
And even so I don't hate Demelo as a 3rd pairing energy guy. In fact I think he is very good in that role with the right partner, but to give him a contract like in this AGM and to say he has any real trade value or top 4 potential is nuts.


Well looks like I have been over rating DeMelo.
Thanks for sharing.
Random2152, BCAPP et oneX a aimé ceci.
30 sept. 2019 à 13 h 33
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,383
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Random2152
Most advanced stats are adjusted to provide an even playing field. The usual chart I post like that is RAPM which literally means 'Regularised Adjusted Plus Minus'
And even so I don't hate Demelo as a 3rd pairing energy guy. In fact I think he is very good in that role with the right partner, but to give him a contract like in this AGM and to say he has any real trade value or top 4 potential is nuts.


Quoting: Trickster
Well looks like I have been over rating DeMelo.
Thanks for sharing.


Me too. For some reason I thought he played 21-22 minutes last year. His Fenwick and Corsi rel have been good the last few years. What does this stat you quote show?
30 sept. 2019 à 13 h 45
#19
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 5,703
Modifié 30 sept. 2019 à 13 h 53
Quoting: BCAPP
Me too. For some reason I thought he played 21-22 minutes last year. His Fenwick and Corsi rel have been good the last few years. What does this stat you quote show?

As I said. Good 3rd pairing guy. Not top 4 though.
Also, Don't fall into the trap of toi indicating a good dman. It is absolutely false.
EFuuYTDWsAEhbBW?format=png&name=small
EFuuYTEWsAAii_p?format=png&name=small
EFuuYTVWoAACAMk?format=png&name=small
oneX et Trickster a aimé ceci.
30 sept. 2019 à 14 h 47
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,383
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Random2152
As I said. Good 3rd pairing guy. Not top 4 though.
Also, Don't fall into the trap of toi indicating a good dman. It is absolutely false.
EFuuYTDWsAEhbBW?format=png&name=small
EFuuYTEWsAAii_p?format=png&name=small
EFuuYTVWoAACAMk?format=png&name=small


Thanks for the data. Do you have any idea what they are controlling for? His raw numbers are better. I'm not sure why the adjusted numbers are so much worse.

But anyway for some reason in my head I had him playing 21-22 minutes a night not 19.
30 sept. 2019 à 14 h 50
#21
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 5,703
Quoting: BCAPP
Thanks for the data. Do you have any idea what they are controlling for? His raw numbers are better. I'm not sure why the adjusted numbers are so much worse.

But anyway for some reason in my head I had him playing 21-22 minutes a night not 19.


Feel free to read their description on the websites. Does a better job than I could. Evolving hockey for the rapm to be specific but it goes way in depth with the technical side so good luck.
Trickster a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage