SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Burns Package to Dallas for Seguin

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2019-20 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 10 août 2019
Publié: 10 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Brent moves to his summer home in Texas near his ranch where he can continue feeding tips to Pavelski.

Dallas isn’t trading Seguin but between last year’s rumors of tensions with him and the organization and this opportunity to have a one-two with Burns and Klingberg, as well as acquiring top-6 projected winger Chem for 2019-20 and 3rd line center prospect Gregor, here’s a one in a million scenario to help pass the time in the offseason.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
11 950 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de SJS
Logo de PHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 816 584 $660 750 $0 $5 683 416 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 635 000 $1 635 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
960 000 $960 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 août 2019 à 5 h 26
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,568
Mentions "j'aime": 5,047
Burns is 33 making 8 mil until the end of time. Seguin is a prime producer. You're talking much more than this to make it work. Seguin is better all over the ice than Brent Burns. Seguin is certainly better defensively, and offensively it's not close. Seguin has much more value than this, even with the controvercy and apparent fall out between player and management
10 août 2019 à 5 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,636
Mentions "j'aime": 19,740
Quoting: Caniac2000
Burns is 33 making 8 mil until the end of time. Seguin is a prime producer. You're talking much more than this to make it work. Seguin is better all over the ice than Brent Burns. Seguin is certainly better defensively, and offensively it's not close. Seguin has much more value than this, even with the controvercy and apparent fall out between player and management


Did you even see the package being offered? TBH I would rather have Burns.
10 août 2019 à 6 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,568
Mentions "j'aime": 5,047
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Did you even see the package being offered? TBH I would rather have Burns.


I looked and it's not enough. Seguin is better than Burns all over the ice. Defensively, it's known Burns is a turnstile, offensively, Seguin can throw up 70 points in a down year.... it's just not enough
10 août 2019 à 6 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,636
Mentions "j'aime": 19,740
Quoting: Caniac2000
I looked and it's not enough. Seguin is better than Burns all over the ice. Defensively, it's known Burns is a turnstile, offensively, Seguin can throw up 70 points in a down year.... it's just not enough


Burns put up 67 points in a down year... and hes a defense. also saying hes defensively impaired is just a false statement.
10 août 2019 à 6 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 451
Mentions "j'aime": 232
You're not getting Seguin for a Burns package unless you heavily overpay, so this deal isn't enough. Not a Stars or Sharks fan, but that Burns contract... Seguin is on a pretty good deal and Dallas relies on their top line. Burns is 34 and has 6 years remaining on that 8M deal. They have Klingberg so Burns isn't necessary. If Burns' offensive numbers drop, he's not that good. From Dallas perspective, I'd rather have Seguin than Burns.
10 août 2019 à 6 h 30
#6
Vorg1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 244
Mentions "j'aime": 52
Guys, calm down. This is fantasy. Relax
10 août 2019 à 7 h 52
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,568
Mentions "j'aime": 5,047
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Burns put up 67 points in a down year... and hes a defense. also saying hes defensively impaired is just a false statement.


Burns is defensively worse than ANYONE in the league. He's easier to get past than a Parking cone. He's so bad defensively. As for scoring, you wanna argue Seguin isn't as good as burns? The only person you're convincing in either regard is yourself. Burns is horrific defensively, most OFD are. He's a winger on the blue line, he can't defend.
10 août 2019 à 8 h 25
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Does the trade allow for teams to retain salary in CapFriendly?
10 août 2019 à 8 h 48
#9
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Caniac2000
Burns is defensively worse than ANYONE in the league. He's easier to get past than a Parking cone. He's so bad defensively. As for scoring, you wanna argue Seguin isn't as good as burns? The only person you're convincing in either regard is yourself. Burns is horrific defensively, most OFD are. He's a winger on the blue line, he can't defend.


TBF, Seguin is also a turnstile? The bid above is too low, based on age and contract, as you point out, but it's not ridiculous.... or wouldn't be if Dallas had any center depth and hadn't just lost Spezz to the Leafs, at minimum wage.
10 août 2019 à 9 h 10
#10
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,654
Mentions "j'aime": 8,295
in a pure fantasy kind of look yeah the trade has value but neither team would want to move their player
10 août 2019 à 11 h 44
#11
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
You don’t trade your #1 center who’s locked up long term. The stars aren’t rebuilding, so how are they better from this deal? Just because you think the value is there (it isn’t) doesn’t mean Dallas wants what you’re offering. They already have klingberg/heiskanen , they don’t need burns. For Dallas to even consider it, hertl and burns for seguin
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage