SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Ottawa Senators signed Jonathan Gruden (3 Years / $802,500 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


3 avr. 2019 à 14 h 40
#1
Jonathan Gruden has signed a new contract with the Ottawa Senators.
Contrat d’entrée
Contrats comparablesCOMPARER CE CONTRAT
SIGNÉ PAR: Pierre Dorion
Durée: 3 ans
Valeur: 2 490 000 $
Statut à l’échéance du contrat: RFA
% Cap Info-bulle: 0,99
Contrat signé avec: Logo de Sénateurs d'OttawaSénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de signature: 3 avr. 2019
Source: CapFriendly

Jonathan Gruden a signé un contrat de 3 ans d'une valeur de 2 490 000 $ avec les Sénateurs d'Ottawa, le 3 avr. 2019. Le contrat comporte un cap hit de 788 333 $.

SAISONClauseCap hitInfo-bulleAAV Info-bulleBonis de performanceInfo-bulleBonis de signatureInfo-bulleSalaire de baseInfo-bulleSalaire totalInfo-bulleSalaire mineuresInfo-bulle
2019-20815 833 $830 000 $82 500 $REPORT D’ENTRÉE EN VIGUEUR DU CONTRAT D’ENTRÉE
2020-21788 333 $802 500 $42 500 $82 500 $700 000 $782 500 $70 000 $
2021-22788 333 $802 500 $0 $82 500 $750 000 $832 500 $70 000 $
2022-23788 333 $802 500 $0 $0 $750 000 $750 000 $70 000 $
TOTAL3 180 832 $3 237 500 $42 500 $247 500 $2 117 500 $2 365 000 $210 000 $
Offre qualificativeInfo-bulle: 787 500 $
3 avr. 2019 à 15 h 35
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,056
Mentions "j'aime": 12,065
Mixed feelings about this. I like Johnny G, but I don't think he's close to ready. Could have really benefited from a couple more seasons of college hockey.

Would think he's CHL bound, because I don't think he's ready for pro hockey.
3 avr. 2019 à 16 h 54
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 500
Head coach, TV analyst, hockey player, he does it all.
3 avr. 2019 à 17 h 6
#4
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Mixed feelings about this. I like Johnny G, but I don't think he's close to ready. Could have really benefited from a couple more seasons of college hockey.

Would think he's CHL bound, because I don't think he's ready for pro hockey.


Oh yeah! He's your typical London Knight bound player. Just based on highlights, I think he'll develop much better in the OHL than in Ohio! And hopefully, he can play a role on the US world juniors Team.
4 avr. 2019 à 14 h 20
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Mixed feelings about this. I like Johnny G, but I don't think he's close to ready. Could have really benefited from a couple more seasons of college hockey.

Would think he's CHL bound, because I don't think he's ready for pro hockey.


yeah I agree completely, he should have stayed in the NCAA or went to the canadian leagues for at least another year.
4 avr. 2019 à 18 h 32
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,056
Mentions "j'aime": 12,065
Quoting: pharrow
yeah I agree completely, he should have stayed in the NCAA or went to the canadian leagues for at least another year.


Apparently Ottawa may have had concerns about his school's Development Program. If that's the case, I'm totally okay with the team pulling him out and getting him into the London system.

I'd be concerned if he actually turned pro next year.
4 avr. 2019 à 23 h 53
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Apparently Ottawa may have had concerns about his school's Development Program. If that's the case, I'm totally okay with the team pulling him out and getting him into the London system.

I'd be concerned if he actually turned pro next year.


there are easier solutions, like transferring schools.
5 avr. 2019 à 10 h 41
#8
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: pharrow
there are easier solutions, like transferring schools.


If you transfer schools, you have to sit out an entire year before being eligible to play again. So that wasn't really an option.
5 avr. 2019 à 13 h 14
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ThatGuy
If you transfer schools, you have to sit out an entire year before being eligible to play again. So that wasn't really an option.


actually I know this rule well and I'm not sure that is true. First off he has to be on scholarship. I don't know if he is or isn't.
Second
"An NCAA school may file a waiver on your behalf; you cannot file a waiver for yourself. The school does not administer the waiver, the conference office or NCAA does."

You can simply ask for the waiver which would most likely be given.

It's a tricky subject but the fact that it's hockey and not division one basketball or football, he has a lot more options.
5 avr. 2019 à 13 h 52
#10
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: pharrow
actually I know this rule well and I'm not sure that is true. First off he has to be on scholarship. I don't know if he is or isn't.
Second
"An NCAA school may file a waiver on your behalf; you cannot file a waiver for yourself. The school does not administer the waiver, the conference office or NCAA does."

You can simply ask for the waiver which would most likely be given.

It's a tricky subject but the fact that it's hockey and not division one basketball or football, he has a lot more options.


You cleverly left out the first part of your quote: ''An action that sets aside an NCAA rule because a specific, extraordinary circumstance prevents you from meeting the rule. An NCAA school may.......''

Not being happy with your ice time, or wanting to join a better team isn't considered to be a specific, extraordinary circumstance. You can't simply ask for a waiver.

Jumping from one school to another doesn't happen in NCAA Div I. It's a pretty standard and well-known practice.

''Requiring student-athletes to sit out of competition for a year after transferring encourages them to make decisions motivated by academics as well as athletics. Most student-athletes who are not eligible to compete immediately benefit from a year to adjust to their new school and focus on their classes.''

The first purpose of NCAA is getting your education. They don't want universities to be run like an OHL team.

Nice try though
5 avr. 2019 à 15 h 21
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ThatGuy
You cleverly left out the first part of your quote: ''An action that sets aside an NCAA rule because a specific, extraordinary circumstance prevents you from meeting the rule. An NCAA school may.......''

Not being happy with your ice time, or wanting to join a better team isn't considered to be a specific, extraordinary circumstance. You can't simply ask for a waiver.

Jumping from one school to another doesn't happen in NCAA Div I. It's a pretty standard and well-known practice.

''Requiring student-athletes to sit out of competition for a year after transferring encourages them to make decisions motivated by academics as well as athletics. Most student-athletes who are not eligible to compete immediately benefit from a year to adjust to their new school and focus on their classes.''

The first purpose of NCAA is getting your education. They don't want universities to be run like an OHL team.

Nice try though


you clearly left out the part where there were questions about the hockey organization as being the reason he went pro. Which is clearly a "extraordinary circumstance". The waiver rule is there for a reason, aka so kids aren't stuck in a bad program negatively effecting their growth. That isn't good for the NCAA or the kid.
On top of it, we don't know if he has a scholarship. If there isn't one he can do anything he wants. He was a 4th round pick not a 1st round pick. He might not be riding on a scholarship.
5 avr. 2019 à 16 h 1
#12
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: pharrow
you clearly left out the part where there were questions about the hockey organization as being the reason he went pro. Which is clearly a "extraordinary circumstance". The waiver rule is there for a reason, aka so kids aren't stuck in a bad program negatively effecting their growth. That isn't good for the NCAA or the kid.
On top of it, we don't know if he has a scholarship. If there isn't one he can do anything he wants. He was a 4th round pick not a 1st round pick. He might not be riding on a scholarship.


1) What does scholarships have to do with anything?
2) Doesn't matter if there are questions regarding the hockey program. You technically go to school for the education.
6 avr. 2019 à 0 h 59
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ThatGuy
1) What does scholarships have to do with anything?
2) Doesn't matter if there are questions regarding the hockey program. You technically go to school for the education.


1. If you aren't on scholarship you can transfer and play there is no waiting period at all.
2. that isn't true. Players have been moved from all leagues in the NCAA over program issues. Now I don't know what the issue is, the other user above noted it. But if there is a fundamental issue there you could get a waiver. Not to mention you can easily PC fabricate an issue and be done with it. I know this for a fact. I have seen kids transfer to other schools for "family reasons" and get a waiver. Lets not pretend the NCAA is some straight and narrow organization. It's never been that.
8 avr. 2019 à 11 h 7
#14
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: pharrow
1. If you aren't on scholarship you can transfer and play there is no waiting period at all.
2. that isn't true. Players have been moved from all leagues in the NCAA over program issues. Now I don't know what the issue is, the other user above noted it. But if there is a fundamental issue there you could get a waiver. Not to mention you can easily PC fabricate an issue and be done with it. I know this for a fact. I have seen kids transfer to other schools for "family reasons" and get a waiver. Lets not pretend the NCAA is some straight and narrow organization. It's never been that.


Can you name me one NHL player who transferred schools during his NCAA career?
8 avr. 2019 à 12 h 24
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ThatGuy
Can you name me one NHL player who transferred schools during his NCAA career?


I know in football Shea Patterson did it.

It's hard to name them off hand because most of them aren't well know, and most kids go into a school on a scholarship.

I know a lot of a lot of NCAA players transfer on the (4-2-4) transfer rule and have immediate eligibility.

But you are looking for NHL players. People who have that skill level most likely are on a scholarship which makes it impossible to not sit. If you are on scholarship, as I said above you have to sit. But if you aren't the rules are different for you. You don't owe the school anything because you are paying for your experience. You are a walk on.
8 avr. 2019 à 12 h 47
#16
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: pharrow
I know in football Shea Patterson did it.

It's hard to name them off hand because most of them aren't well know, and most kids go into a school on a scholarship.

I know a lot of a lot of NCAA players transfer on the (4-2-4) transfer rule and have immediate eligibility.

But you are looking for NHL players. People who have that skill level most likely are on a scholarship which makes it impossible to not sit. If you are on scholarship, as I said above you have to sit. But if you aren't the rules are different for you. You don't owe the school anything because you are paying for your experience. You are a walk on.


Ok, football is very different and not a good comparable. There roster size is like 500 whereas the hockey roster is 30ish.

I don't know any hockey players who transferred schools. I know a lot of players who opted out of school to go play in the CHL. Especially after being drafted. So to say it's an easier solution to transfer schools, I completely disagree regardless of whatever loophole you were able to dig up.

And you keep talking about scholarship / non-scholarship transfers? Wanna send me a link?
8 avr. 2019 à 16 h 35
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ThatGuy
Ok, football is very different and not a good comparable. There roster size is like 500 whereas the hockey roster is 30ish.

I don't know any hockey players who transferred schools. I know a lot of players who opted out of school to go play in the CHL. Especially after being drafted. So to say it's an easier solution to transfer schools, I completely disagree regardless of whatever loophole you were able to dig up.


And you keep talking about scholarship / non-scholarship transfers? Wanna send me a link?


It's directly on the NCAA page.

"If you are transferring to a Division I school for any of the previously-listed sports, you may be eligible to compete immediately if you were not recruited by your original school and you have never received an athletics scholarship."

http://www.ncaa.org/student-athletes/current/transfer-terms
8 avr. 2019 à 17 h 0
#18
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: pharrow
It's directly on the NCAA page.

"If you are transferring to a Division I school for any of the previously-listed sports, you may be eligible to compete immediately if you were not recruited by your original school and you have never received an athletics scholarship."

http://www.ncaa.org/student-athletes/current/transfer-terms


Thanks. You are right.

When I first read it, I interpreted it a different way. So I learned something today.

That being said, most Div 1 hockey teams don't usually have open tryouts (like football teams would). I guarantee you that 99% of the players playing div1 are recruited. Especially US players, who end up committing at a very young age (15-16 years old). And all recruited players, except for Ivy league schools, get some form of scholarship (partial, full ride, etc.). Which is why I was sketical.
8 avr. 2019 à 17 h 13
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ThatGuy
Thanks. You are right.

When I first read it, I interpreted it a different way. So I learned something today.

That being said, most Div 1 hockey teams don't usually have open tryouts (like football teams would). I guarantee you that 99% of the players playing div1 are recruited. Especially US players, who end up committing at a very young age (15-16 years old). And all recruited players, except for Ivy league schools, get some form of scholarship (partial, full ride, etc.). Which is why I was sketical.


Bowling Green had open try outs when I played there. The problem was, you don't find anyone coming off the streets who can play.

The real issue is that teams can only give out so many scholarships 18 so divide by 4 and you get roughly 4 per year. They are usually given to players who are 20+ Which is why college hockey players tend to be older. Then general rule is that under 20s can transfer pretty easily because no one gave them anything.

But in general, unless you are getting a ride, you can move fairly easily.
25 janv. 2022 à 11 h 49
#20
cautious optimism
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 3,004
Mentions "j'aime": 5,753
Dual sport personality: Football head coach and left winger. awesome.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage