SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Upgrading before its too late 2 blockbusters

Créé par: MajesticWalrus
Équipe: 2018-19 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 23 févr. 2019
Publié: 23 févr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. Jarry, Tristan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
The 3rd is conditional and could turn into another first if the penguins make the finals
2.
PIT
  1. Panarin, Artemi
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (CBJ)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Hörnqvist, Patric
  2. Määttä, Olli
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Keeps columbus competitive and likely the best offer for a player who guaranteed he will enter FA no matter what team he may be on after the deadline
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de PIT
Logo de CBJ
Logo de BUF
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de CBJ
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $76 178 334 $0 $982 500 $3 321 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
734 167 $734 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 175 000 $5 175 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
794 167 $794 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 févr. 2019 à 13 h 47
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 3,022
Mentions "j'aime": 351
23 févr. 2019 à 13 h 49
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 188
Mentions "j'aime": 29
In my opinion, that is an overpay for Hayes (especially with the clause on the 3rd, holy cow) and a not even close to fair value for Panarin. Columbus is looking for an elite winger + for him and Hornqvist plus a 2nd or 3rd line d man is not worth it. They would also need a 2019 1st, not a 2021 one. This team needs upgrades if they want to make it anywhere, but I don't know if these are the right deals to make.
23 févr. 2019 à 13 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,863
Mentions "j'aime": 8,867
Overpayemt for Hayes, they gladly accept.

Jax decline.
23 févr. 2019 à 13 h 50
#4
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Panarin is possibly of the market so no on that one also not enough. But Hayes move is overpayment with conditional 3rd but without it I like it. Im doubtful they would want G prospect tho. Lots of good ones within their system.
23 févr. 2019 à 14 h 2
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 3,022
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Quoting: Mitch11
In my opinion, that is an overpay for Hayes (especially with the clause on the 3rd, holy cow) and a not even close to fair value for Panarin. Columbus is looking for an elite winger + for him and Hornqvist plus a 2nd or 3rd line d man is not worth it. They would also need a 2019 1st, not a 2021 one. This team needs upgrades if they want to make it anywhere, but I don't know if these are the right deals to make.


They want an elite+ winger for Panarin? And more on top of that? Thats delusional..why would any team trade their elite winger for an elite winger that will leave them in the summer plus lose other assets.
23 févr. 2019 à 14 h 3
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Way too much for Hayes. No way pit pays that. When it comes to Panarin, CBJ will likely keep him for a run.
23 févr. 2019 à 14 h 5
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
I don't see panarin as being traded at this point. They are gonna go for it unless they get a really good offer for him. For what they gave up for MD, Panarin being the better player. I would expect 2 1st (one conditional) and a A+ prospect.
23 févr. 2019 à 15 h 0
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 188
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: MajesticWalrus
They want an elite+ winger for Panarin? And more on top of that? Thats delusional..why would any team trade their elite winger for an elite winger that will leave them in the summer plus lose other assets.


That didn’t really come out right, I guess. My point was that they would some sort of replacement for him either now or in the future, like a potentially elite prospect +. The + in my comment meant plus additional things, not more than elite. My overall point was that I do not think they will move him unless that are blown away by an offer. Also, Maatta kind of sucks to be honest, and him and Hornqvist is not enough. It would take a 1st, a really good spec and possibly more
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage