SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Manson at Deadline

Créé par: Rodzikhockey93
Équipe: 2018-19 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 15 janv. 2019
Publié: 15 janv. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Thinking this is under valued a little. TML add a little??
Transactions
ANA
  1. Bracco, Jeremy
  2. Johnsson, Andreas
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $72 998 611 $2 550 000 $6 250 000 $6 501 389 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 277 778 $10 277 778 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 janv. 2019 à 16 h 45
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
I am certain it would take more to get Manson but this would be pretty awesome.
15 janv. 2019 à 16 h 45
#2
Démarrer sujet
Still a Leafs Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 5,582
Mentions "j'aime": 669
Quoting: LoganOllivier
I am certain it would take more to get Manson but this would be pretty awesome.


read description
15 janv. 2019 à 16 h 59
#3
Hawks Apologist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 30
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: LoganOllivier
I am certain it would take more to get Manson but this would be pretty awesome.


I actually think this is pretty fair value
15 janv. 2019 à 17 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
A little undervalued???? Would you do sprong and kase for Reilly??? Lmao get out of here
15 janv. 2019 à 17 h 37
#5
AustonFathews
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 321
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: mhockey91
A little undervalued???? Would you do sprong and kase for Reilly??? Lmao get out of here


Comparing Manson to the #1 Norris candidate? lmao
15 janv. 2019 à 17 h 43
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: notKyleDUbas123
Comparing Manson to the #1 Norris candidate? lmao


He’s not the #1 Norris candidate lol. And last year Manson was better then Rielly haha. This is Rielly’s breakout season (clearly) Manson is MUCH better in his own end then Reilly. Obviously Rielly is a better hockey player than Manson due to his offensive potential, but kase+ sprong is also a better package than Johnsson+Brown so....
15 janv. 2019 à 18 h 3
#7
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,159
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: mhockey91
A little undervalued???? Would you do sprong and kase for Reilly??? Lmao get out of here


lol come on exaggerate much.... Manson is the third best defender on the ducks.... Reilly is in the top three in the league this season.

The package is for Bracco not brown. Although they may be near the same value at the moment. I would elect to keep bracco.

Just to make things perfectluly clear I value Johnsson the same as kapanen so if you were to substitute him in there and that makes you feel better about the deal then you can just do so.

My theory on your analogy Johnson>sprong or kase... bracco=spring and kase value wise. And Reilly>Manson(value wise)

I will use kappy in my trade proposal since he is the one of the two that seems to get fair value and we are very deep on the RW.

Kapanen
liljegren
3rd round pick

If they want Lilly think we would need montour back rather than Manson is my personal opinion. We are giving up a lot of years of control in this deal and montour’s age fits our core better.
Britishbulldog a aimé ceci.
15 janv. 2019 à 18 h 14
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: Jamiepo
lol come on exaggerate much.... Manson is the third best defender on the ducks.... Reilly is in the top three in the league this season.

The package is for Bracco not brown. Although they may be near the same value at the moment. I would elect to keep bracco.

Just to make things perfectluly clear I value Johnsson the same as kapanen so if you were to substitute him in there and that makes you feel better about the deal then you can just do so.

My theory on your analogy Johnson>sprong or kase... bracco=spring and kase value wise. And Reilly>Manson(value wise)

I will use kappy in my trade proposal since he is the one of the two that seems to get fair value and we are very deep on the RW.

Kapanen
liljegren
3rd round pick

If they want Lilly think we would need montour back rather than Manson is my personal opinion. We are giving up a lot of years of control in this deal and montour’s age fits our core better.


I’d say Manson is their best D, he’s a 40 point shut down beast. Last year he was phenomenal. This year everyone sucks. Rielly, while playing amazing, isn’t good enough defensively and doesn’t play enough minutes to be considered a “top 3 D”

Johnson isn’t worth as much as Kap. You may think so, but majority of people would beg to differ. I could value Guzental just as much as marner, doesn’t mean it’s right.
My value, which once again would be popular opinion this site:
Kase>Johnsson
Sprong>Bracco

This trade is miles off. I’m buddies with Rodzik IRL and when he posted it I screenshot it, put it in our GC, and everyone laughed at him, even fellow leafs fans. It ain’t close haha
15 janv. 2019 à 18 h 29
#9
Rangers 2024
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,103
Mentions "j'aime": 5,442
Quoting: notKyleDUbas123
Comparing Manson to the #1 Norris candidate? lmao


Stop being biased, gio is way ahead of rielly
15 janv. 2019 à 18 h 34
#10
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,159
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: mhockey91
I’d say Manson is their best D, he’s a 40 point shut down beast. Last year he was phenomenal. This year everyone sucks. Rielly, while playing amazing, isn’t good enough defensively and doesn’t play enough minutes to be considered a “top 3 D”

Johnson isn’t worth as much as Kap. You may think so, but majority of people would beg to differ. I could value Guzental just as much as marner, doesn’t mean it’s right.
My value, which once again would be popular opinion this site:
Kase>Johnsson
Sprong>Bracco

This trade is miles off. I’m buddies with Rodzik IRL and when he posted it I screenshot it, put it in our GC, and everyone laughed at him, even fellow leafs fans. It ain’t close haha


No I agree the deal is light for sure but Manson has never put up a 40 point season..,

Reilly is a back to back 50 point player who is solid defensively. Not sure where that is coming from. Reilly has almost triple the points of Manson with one extra season.

This whole Reilly is not a top pairing Dman has got to go away. He has done all this with a corpse for a partner.

You can say what you want about kapanen=Johnsson but from watching them play the only differences I see is kappy is a bit faster and Johnsson was snake bitten the first 18 games of the season. Just bad luck, he made a lot of goaltenders work. Kappy has 38 points in 100 games and Johnsson has 24points in 49 games so even at ppg he is doing better than kappy.

To me Johnsson May be more valuable as a left handed forward as far as team needs.


The deal is for sure light even mine may be a bit light but that is really all I would give up for Manson other than maybe a 1st rather than a third but at that point you’re at 3 first round picks.... that has to be tops....might as well just send out an offersheet lol.
15 janv. 2019 à 18 h 35
#11
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,159
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Stop being biased, gio is way ahead of rielly


Yup I would say so at this point he has been a beast lately. Good all season but lately he is on fire. Then again I still say burns over both so...
15 janv. 2019 à 18 h 39
#12
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,159
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
@mhockey91 also forgot

1.Fowler
2.lindholm
3.manson/montour
15 janv. 2019 à 18 h 43
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: Jamiepo
No I agree the deal is light for sure but Manson has never put up a 40 point season..,

Reilly is a back to back 50 point player who is solid defensively. Not sure where that is coming from. Reilly has almost triple the points of Manson with one extra season.

This whole Reilly is not a top pairing Dman has got to go away. He has done all this with a corpse for a partner.

You can say what you want about kapanen=Johnsson but from watching them play the only differences I see is kappy is a bit faster and Johnsson was snake bitten the first 18 games of the season. Just bad luck, he made a lot of goaltenders work. Kappy has 38 points in 100 games and Johnsson has 24points in 49 games so even at ppg he is doing better than kappy.

To me Johnsson May be more valuable as a left handed forward as far as team needs.


The deal is for sure light even mine may be a bit light but that is really all I would give up for Manson other than maybe a 1st rather than a third but at that point you’re at 3 first round picks.... that has to be tops....might as well just send out an offersheet lol.


I never said Reilly isn’t a #1D, I said he’s not a top 3 in this league haha. He puts up a lot of points obviously but he doesn’t play enough minutes: averages around 22 mins I believe? And his shot/goal suppression is nothing to brag about. Like I said, obviously Rielly is better than manson, but Manson is a great player, who could fetch A LOT more then what Rodzik purposed. He’s a relatively young, top pairing RHD signed to a great contract. It would cost you MUCH more than what Rodzik purposed. That’s all I’m saying. If he was actually available, there would be MANY good offers involving a first round pick + top prospect. there is a shortage of RHD’s. Teams would pay a premium. I’m taking Manson wayyyyyyyyyyy over larsson, and Larson got hall so... another example: look what Dougie Hamilton coasted.
15 janv. 2019 à 18 h 47
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: Jamiepo
@mhockey91 also forgot

1.Fowler
2.lindholm
3.manson/montour


Ducks D is very close. You can argue All 3 of them at #1. They all play similar minutes too. It just depends what season. Id probably go Lindholm/Manson, then Fowler
BeastMode5515 a aimé ceci.
15 janv. 2019 à 19 h 31
#15
Rangers 2024
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,103
Mentions "j'aime": 5,442
Quoting: Jamiepo
@mhockey91 also forgot

1.Fowler
2.lindholm
3.manson/montour


If it was me it would be
1. Lindholm
2. Manson
3. Fowler
4. Montour
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
15 janv. 2019 à 19 h 46
#16
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,159
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: mhockey91
Ducks D is very close. You can argue All 3 of them at #1. They all play similar minutes too. It just depends what season. Id probably go Lindholm/Manson, then Fowler


I don’t see it as “much more” I try to think of realistic trades not cap friendly ones. They are much less exciting in real life.

Please see: every trade on cap friendly compared to what that player actually fetched.

And as for reilly’s Shot suppression.... Hainsey.... enough said lol. I don’t pay as much attention to shot suppression as I do the eye test. If shots are coming in because leafs are playing bad team defence then I don’t put it on Reilly. He does a great job in his own end.... even with hainsey’s lifeless corpse chained to him.
15 janv. 2019 à 23 h 37
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
If it was me it would be
1. Lindholm
2. Manson
3. Fowler
4. Montour


Same
15 janv. 2019 à 23 h 38
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: Jamiepo
I don’t see it as “much more” I try to think of realistic trades not cap friendly ones. They are much less exciting in real life.

Please see: every trade on cap friendly compared to what that player actually fetched.

And as for reilly’s Shot suppression.... Hainsey.... enough said lol. I don’t pay as much attention to shot suppression as I do the eye test. If shots are coming in because leafs are playing bad team defence then I don’t put it on Reilly. He does a great job in his own end.... even with hainsey’s lifeless corpse chained to him.


Dude, Manson is a legit #1RHD. Rodzik offered: a 3rd liner, a AHL RW with limited NHL potential, and a 2nd.
It just doesn’t add up
15 janv. 2019 à 23 h 59
#19
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,159
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Modifié 16 janv. 2019 à 0 h 6
Quoting: mhockey91
Dude, Manson is a legit #1RHD. Rodzik offered: a 3rd liner, a AHL RW with limited NHL potential, and a 2nd.
It just doesn’t add up


So a 1st/2nd liner on the leafs is a 3rd liner.... Bracco who has zero nhl experience is already limited (he looks pretty damn good to me I would say a lock for top 9 potential and possibly top 6, excellent vision and play making) i’m Actually excited to see him have a chance next season.

And like I’ve already said it is not enough. Are we 2 1st rounders short.... no. Better pick and a prospect with more pedigree, liljegren would be less needed if we pick up an rhd with term. Don’t like Johnsson take kappy. Works either way for me. Ducks get younger and a first round puck that has potential. They also get faster and more scoring. Move montour up to first pair and sign a ufa or trade for a decent 2nd pair guy and get the team closer to competitive.

I don’t see the point in doubling a players value due to position. If any position it would be centre, it’s a tough job.

Now this is a **** trade https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/984540
16 janv. 2019 à 8 h 43
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: Jamiepo
So a 1st/2nd liner on the leafs is a 3rd liner.... Bracco who has zero nhl experience is already limited (he looks pretty damn good to me I would say a lock for top 9 potential and possibly top 6, excellent vision and play making) i’m Actually excited to see him have a chance next season.

And like I’ve already said it is not enough. Are we 2 1st rounders short.... no. Better pick and a prospect with more pedigree, liljegren would be less needed if we pick up an rhd with term. Don’t like Johnsson take kappy. Works either way for me. Ducks get younger and a first round puck that has potential. They also get faster and more scoring. Move montour up to first pair and sign a ufa or trade for a decent 2nd pair guy and get the team closer to competitive.

I don’t see the point in doubling a players value due to position. If any position it would be centre, it’s a tough job.

Now this is a **** trade https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/984540


Dude, Johnsson is not a top 6 forward haha. Take him off the leafs and throw him on a team with limited offence and see how he does. Bracco a top 9 forward? Gimme a break. You’re offering a whole lot of nothing
16 janv. 2019 à 10 h 53
#21
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,159
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: mhockey91
Dude, Johnsson is not a top 6 forward haha. Take him off the leafs and throw him on a team with limited offence and see how he does. Bracco a top 9 forward? Gimme a break. You’re offering a whole lot of nothing


Have you even seen any marlies games this season? I said the same thing about kapanen this year and all I heard was the same thing your saying here. Je’s A fourth liner and trash. Grundstrom Moore and bracco are our three strongest prospects on the marlies. If it wasn’t for our offensive depth they would all be nhlr’s this season.

O offered up stats on Johnsson and how much better they are then kapanen’s but you just look right passed it. I’m not trying to say that either Johnsson or kappy are going to be elite, just good solid hard working 40-60 point guys. I don’t think the gap is that huge between them. Personally I don’t think it really exists at all.

And once again I said the deal is a bit light but to under value players and call them nothing is just wrong. Over valuing Manson and under valuing prospects and players sure does make thisvtrade look a lot worse. But you take out bracco and add Lilly and change the 2nd to a first and I would say it is a good starting point.
16 janv. 2019 à 11 h 28
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: Jamiepo
Have you even seen any marlies games this season? I said the same thing about kapanen this year and all I heard was the same thing your saying here. Je’s A fourth liner and trash. Grundstrom Moore and bracco are our three strongest prospects on the marlies. If it wasn’t for our offensive depth they would all be nhlr’s this season.

O offered up stats on Johnsson and how much better they are then kapanen’s but you just look right passed it. I’m not trying to say that either Johnsson or kappy are going to be elite, just good solid hard working 40-60 point guys. I don’t think the gap is that huge between them. Personally I don’t think it really exists at all.

And once again I said the deal is a bit light but to under value players and call them nothing is just wrong. Over valuing Manson and under valuing prospects and players sure does make thisvtrade look a lot worse. But you take out bracco and add Lilly and change the 2nd to a first and I would say it is a good starting point.


I don’t think Johnson is anything special and he is just a product of his team. No way he ever touches 60 points, and I highly doubt bracco will ever be an nhl regular. Not sold on either of those guys. Johnsson looks better cause of his team. He’s a third liner, 30-40 point guy At his best imo. Even kappenen has slowed down a lot since his hot start. Not even sure how high his ceiling is.
16 janv. 2019 à 11 h 34
#23
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,159
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: mhockey91
I don’t think Johnson is anything special and he is just a product of his team. No way he ever touches 60 points, and I highly doubt bracco will ever be an nhl regular. Not sold on either of those guys. Johnsson looks better cause of his team. He’s a third liner, 30-40 point guy At his best imo. Even kappenen has slowed down a lot since his hot start. Not even sure how high his ceiling is.


Johnsson is on pace for over 40 points in his rookie season, that’s a hell of ceiling to put on him...
16 janv. 2019 à 13 h 27
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: Jamiepo
Johnsson is on pace for over 40 points in his rookie season, that’s a hell of ceiling to put on him...


He’s also 24 and playing on one of the best Offences in the league. He’ll be a good third liner imo
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage