SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Which team has a worse blueline than this Leafs wo Gardiner

Créé par: tatatavares
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 12 oct. 2018
Publié: 12 oct. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
see POLL
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 100 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
779 500 000 $15 095 833 $0 $400 000 $64 404 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
Would you trade your team's entire blueline for the Leafs' one posted above?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


12 oct. 2018 à 14 h 26
#1
Glep
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 911
Ottawa or Detroit, AKA the worst teams in the nhl
12 oct. 2018 à 14 h 27
#2
Démarrer sujet
Big John T
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 468
Mentions "j'aime": 84
Quoting: Hurricanes73
Ottawa or Detroit, AKA the worst teams in the nhl


fair enough, I did forget about Detroit -- lots of old, expensive, broken bodies.

Though I don't think Ottawa trades Chabot for the Leafs' entire blueline
12 oct. 2018 à 14 h 49
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,855
Mentions "j'aime": 22,863
Dallas, they are playing two Leaf rejects, Polak and Carrick. Certainly Montreal, Dallas, Chicago and Detroit. They allowed more goals than the Leafs when the too teams played.
12 oct. 2018 à 15 h 12
#4
Démarrer sujet
Big John T
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 468
Mentions "j'aime": 84
Quoting: palhal
Dallas, they are playing two Leaf rejects, Polak and Carrick. Certainly Montreal, Dallas, Chicago and Detroit. They allowed more goals than the Leafs when the too teams played.


Klingberg + Heiskanen 2 top pair D on their ELCs.
Lindell + Honka are equivalent to Dermott + Liljegren
Methot trumps any further debate


Also Carrick was not the worst defensively for the Leafs, but they committed to Zaitsev + Ozzy.
Polak, I have no idea what their GM was thinking but I guess the Leafs have Hainsey just to be that veteran guy as well.
12 oct. 2018 à 15 h 18
#5
Démarrer sujet
Big John T
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 468
Mentions "j'aime": 84
Modifié 12 oct. 2018 à 15 h 33
small sample, but Leafs WITH Gardiner this season
5 on 5 % of shots while score close

1. San Jose 64.46%
3. Vegas 61.74%
13. Dallas 52.55%
18. Leafs 49.60% (for reference, it was 13th/16 or 46.19% in last year's playoff hockey)
20. Detroit 47.67%
24. Washington 41.18%

Leafs without Gardiner probably fall to where Washington has been to start this season, without the hangover excuse or extensions in the rearview mirror. Just above an Anaheim with 7 guys on LTIR, or NYR who are beginning their own scorched earth Shanaplan.


So Leafs without Gardiner are about as good as NYI's defence today, although the Leafs have a brighter future. So NYI and DET are 2 teams that would swap bluelines with the Leafs. Not the worst in the league, but it's a glaring problem compared to the rest of the team and it's receiving no attention. Unless a star forward is traded, Gardiner walks and no one new comes in -- which everyone seems to be fine with, just keep sweeping the problem under the rug
12 oct. 2018 à 16 h 19
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Here are some stats in regards to this season and the Leafs defensively.

So far this season the Leafs are allowing only the 11th-most high danger chances against, 13th-most scoring chances on net against, 16th-most scoring chances against, and 22nd-most passes to the slot against in the NHL, so they’re fairly close to average.

Is the defence as terrible as everyone on here says it is? The answer is an absolute no. They are average. And some strong team defence would likely move them into the top quarter of the league.

This is why Dubas isn't worried about trading Nylander, a 1st and Liljegren to appease fans. Just settle down everyone.
Random2152 a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2018 à 16 h 55
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,855
Mentions "j'aime": 22,863
Klingberg isn't on his ELC. But a heck of fib try to win your point.
Random2152 a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2018 à 20 h 4
#8
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,337
Mentions "j'aime": 5,673
Quoting: palhal
Klingberg isn't on his ELC. But a heck of fib try to win your point.


Quoting: LoganOllivier
Here are some stats in regards to this season and the Leafs defensively.

So far this season the Leafs are allowing only the 11th-most high danger chances against, 13th-most scoring chances on net against, 16th-most scoring chances against, and 22nd-most passes to the slot against in the NHL, so they’re fairly close to average.

Is the defence as terrible as everyone on here says it is? The answer is an absolute no. They are average. And some strong team defence would likely move them into the top quarter of the league.

This is why Dubas isn't worried about trading Nylander, a 1st and Liljegren to appease fans. Just settle down everyone.


Quoting: tatatavares
small sample, but Leafs WITH Gardiner this season
5 on 5 % of shots while score close

1. San Jose 64.46%
3. Vegas 61.74%
13. Dallas 52.55%
18. Leafs 49.60% (for reference, it was 13th/16 or 46.19% in last year's playoff hockey)
20. Detroit 47.67%
24. Washington 41.18%

Leafs without Gardiner probably fall to where Washington has been to start this season, without the hangover excuse or extensions in the rearview mirror. Just above an Anaheim with 7 guys on LTIR, or NYR who are beginning their own scorched earth Shanaplan.


So Leafs without Gardiner are about as good as NYI's defence today, although the Leafs have a brighter future. So NYI and DET are 2 teams that would swap bluelines with the Leafs. Not the worst in the league, but it's a glaring problem compared to the rest of the team and it's receiving no attention. Unless a star forward is traded, Gardiner walks and no one new comes in -- which everyone seems to be fine with, just keep sweeping the problem under the rug

Quoting: Hurricanes73
Ottawa or Detroit, AKA the worst teams in the nhl




Going to multi-quote you all here:
Lets go down the list yeah?
Winnipeg: Congrats, you found one of the best D cores in the league.
Washington: Statistically, about the same as the leafs, but the Leafs D core is much much cheaper.
Vegas: Worse than he Leafs. Being completely run over this year. They played a good team defence last year (using the trap), and that has broken down. This core has been exposed. Schmidt and Theodore are nice pieces tho.
Vancouver: Worse than he Leafs.
Tampa Bay: Overrated D. Hedman and Serg. Otherwise meh, McDonnah is not bad. Still better than the Leafs in some aspects, but the Leafs are better offensively. Slight advantage to Tampa. Also, Hedman should not have won Norris. Not even a top 10 Dman statistically last year.
St. Louis: Payako, Petrangelo are good. Otherwise its okay. Better than Leafs.
San Jose: 2 Norris winners and Vlasic this one is not even close, nor should it be. Better than Leafs.
Pittsburgh: Worse, and it is not even close. Letang is only slightly better than Gards at this point (offensively good, prone to turnovers, more physical), and Maata is too slow.
Philly: Two top prospects, otherwise crap. Ghost and Proverov will be great, but they are largely still in the same boat as the Leafs. In the near future, I will give them the edge, but overall, assuming everyone pans out on both team, it is pretty even. (Tor has better bottom 4, Philly has better top 2).
Ottawa: Worse than TOR. They have Chabot and not really much else. Chabot will be a stud, but I liken him to Rielly (given a few years development).
Rangers: Mixed bag. Shatty is crap, McQuaid is meh at best, Staal is ageing rapidly. Skjei is decent (I see him as a good 2LD), as is Poink, but overall missing top end talent. I am giving this one to the Leafs.
Islanders: Worse, and it isn't even close. Give your head a shake if you don't think this. There is a reason JT left.
Devils: I will be honest, I do not know a bunch about this core, I will defer this one.
Nashville: Congrats, you found one of the best D cores in the league.
Montreal: In a worse situation overall. Mete and Juulsen could become very good, Weber is still good when not injured, otherwise its meh at best. I am giving to the Leafs as Rielly is the deciding factor. Also, that Weber contract.. eughhh.
Wild: Better than the Leafs. Sutter, Spurgeon, Dumba... yeah.
LA: Has a great top end talent, not super enthusiastic about the rest of the core right now. Will defer as I do not know enough to make an accurate judgement.
Florida: I will give it to them. D is built for a different game, but I'd take FLA's D over TOR personally.
Edmonton: Bigger names, worse D. Leafs take this one. Nurse should be nice, Klefbom is good, and Larsson is okay. No real top end talent and rest of core is a drag. Rielly > Klef, Gards = Nurse (different play styles but in terms of value all else equal), Larsson > Zaitzev. TOR's depth is much better (Oz, Dermott, etc).
Detroit: Worse. Old guys slowly being ground into dust. A sad end to the Empire.
Dallas: An interesting lineup. Polak and Carrick make the depth worse. I think Rielly is going to break out this year, but for now, Klingberg > Rielly (slightly). Good prospects coming in. I'm calling even. Very similar core construction.
Jackets: Top end talent beats the leafs, full of depth Carlsson, Nuti, Savard. Better than Leafs.
Colorado: Good young talent. Solid top guys. Off the top of my head. Gards ~= Barrie (Barrie better at D, Gards better at O) Johnsson excellent shut down, Girard excellent pickup. In near future certainly better, right now its tough. Edge to Colorado as Rielly = Johnsson (diff players but value wise), Girard > Dermott.
Chicago: Worse. Big names, mostly ageing core. Keith is still okay, Joki looks good, but too many anchors.
Carolina: Better, just full of depth. Nice top end.
Calgary: Good top 4, better than Leafs.
Buffalo: Gards = Risto, Rielly = ? Good depth but Tor's is farther along developmentally. Leafs have it.
Boston: Ageing core, Chara is still decent, but overused. McAvoy will be a stud. Decent depth all around. Boston has it.
Arizona: OEL and Hjal are good, otherwise Meh. I'm calling about even. OEL > Rielly (but not by a huge amount), Gards < Hjal (again, not by much). Depth goes to TOR.
Anaheim: Yeah, ANA has a stacked D core.

Score:
13 teams are better than the Leafs (ANA,BOS,CAL,CAR,COL,CBJ,FLA,MIN,NSH,SAN,STL,TBL,WPG)
4 about even (ARI,DAL,PHI,WSH)
2 I deferred on due to lack of knowledge (LA,NJD)
11 Teams are worse than the Leafs (BUF,CHI,DET,EDM,MTL,NYI,NYR,OTT,PIT,VAN,VGK)

Would you look at that, about League average... who would have thought.
12 oct. 2018 à 20 h 14
#9
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,337
Mentions "j'aime": 5,673
Quoting: Random2152
Going to multi-quote you all here:
Lets go down the list yeah?
Winnipeg: Congrats, you found one of the best D cores in the league.
Washington: Statistically, about the same as the leafs, but the Leafs D core is much much cheaper.
Vegas: Worse than he Leafs. Being completely run over this year. They played a good team defence last year (using the trap), and that has broken down. This core has been exposed. Schmidt and Theodore are nice pieces tho.
Vancouver: Worse than he Leafs.
Tampa Bay: Overrated D. Hedman and Serg. Otherwise meh, McDonnah is not bad. Still better than the Leafs in some aspects, but the Leafs are better offensively. Slight advantage to Tampa. Also, Hedman should not have won Norris. Not even a top 10 Dman statistically last year.
St. Louis: Payako, Petrangelo are good. Otherwise its okay. Better than Leafs.
San Jose: 2 Norris winners and Vlasic this one is not even close, nor should it be. Better than Leafs.
Pittsburgh: Worse, and it is not even close. Letang is only slightly better than Gards at this point (offensively good, prone to turnovers, more physical), and Maata is too slow.
Philly: Two top prospects, otherwise crap. Ghost and Proverov will be great, but they are largely still in the same boat as the Leafs. In the near future, I will give them the edge, but overall, assuming everyone pans out on both team, it is pretty even. (Tor has better bottom 4, Philly has better top 2).
Ottawa: Worse than TOR. They have Chabot and not really much else. Chabot will be a stud, but I liken him to Rielly (given a few years development).
Rangers: Mixed bag. Shatty is crap, McQuaid is meh at best, Staal is ageing rapidly. Skjei is decent (I see him as a good 2LD), as is Poink, but overall missing top end talent. I am giving this one to the Leafs.
Islanders: Worse, and it isn't even close. Give your head a shake if you don't think this. There is a reason JT left.
Devils: I will be honest, I do not know a bunch about this core, I will defer this one.
Nashville: Congrats, you found one of the best D cores in the league.
Montreal: In a worse situation overall. Mete and Juulsen could become very good, Weber is still good when not injured, otherwise its meh at best. I am giving to the Leafs as Rielly is the deciding factor. Also, that Weber contract.. eughhh.
Wild: Better than the Leafs. Sutter, Spurgeon, Dumba... yeah.
LA: Has a great top end talent, not super enthusiastic about the rest of the core right now. Will defer as I do not know enough to make an accurate judgement.
Florida: I will give it to them. D is built for a different game, but I'd take FLA's D over TOR personally.
Edmonton: Bigger names, worse D. Leafs take this one. Nurse should be nice, Klefbom is good, and Larsson is okay. No real top end talent and rest of core is a drag. Rielly > Klef, Gards = Nurse (different play styles but in terms of value all else equal), Larsson > Zaitzev. TOR's depth is much better (Oz, Dermott, etc).
Detroit: Worse. Old guys slowly being ground into dust. A sad end to the Empire.
Dallas: An interesting lineup. Polak and Carrick make the depth worse. I think Rielly is going to break out this year, but for now, Klingberg > Rielly (slightly). Good prospects coming in. I'm calling even. Very similar core construction.
Jackets: Top end talent beats the leafs, full of depth Carlsson, Nuti, Savard. Better than Leafs.
Colorado: Good young talent. Solid top guys. Off the top of my head. Gards ~= Barrie (Barrie better at D, Gards better at O) Johnsson excellent shut down, Girard excellent pickup. In near future certainly better, right now its tough. Edge to Colorado as Rielly = Johnsson (diff players but value wise), Girard > Dermott.
Chicago: Worse. Big names, mostly ageing core. Keith is still okay, Joki looks good, but too many anchors.
Carolina: Better, just full of depth. Nice top end.
Calgary: Good top 4, better than Leafs.
Buffalo: Gards = Risto, Rielly = ? Good depth but Tor's is farther along developmentally. Leafs have it.
Boston: Ageing core, Chara is still decent, but overused. McAvoy will be a stud. Decent depth all around. Boston has it.
Arizona: OEL and Hjal are good, otherwise Meh. I'm calling about even. OEL > Rielly (but not by a huge amount), Gards < Hjal (again, not by much). Depth goes to TOR.
Anaheim: Yeah, ANA has a stacked D core.

Score:
13 teams are better than the Leafs (ANA,BOS,CAL,CAR,COL,CBJ,FLA,MIN,NSH,SAN,STL,TBL,WPG)
4 about even (ARI,DAL,PHI,WSH)
2 I deferred on due to lack of knowledge (LA,NJD)
11 Teams are worse than the Leafs (BUF,CHI,DET,EDM,MTL,NYI,NYR,OTT,PIT,VAN,VGK)

Would you look at that, about League average... who would have thought.


Just noticed that this was for next year, w/o Gards. I think The D weakens a bit, but that Dermott will make up for it. He is developing nicely. Will be at least as good as gard D wise next year, and will only get better. At his career height I think Dermott gets 40 ish points, and is only slightly worse offensively.
12 oct. 2018 à 20 h 26
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,855
Mentions "j'aime": 22,863
Quoting: Random2152
Just noticed that this was for next year, w/o Gards. I think The D weakens a bit, but that Dermott will make up for it. He is developing nicely. Will be at least as good as gard D wise next year, and will only get better. At his career height I think Dermott gets 40 ish points, and is only slightly worse offensively.


I think the author is just an anti leaf troll despite his name.
12 oct. 2018 à 20 h 28
#11
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,337
Mentions "j'aime": 5,673
Quoting: palhal
I think the author is just an anti leaf troll despite his name.


Yeah, I have come to that conclusion also. I just cant help myself. Him and Pharrow....
12 oct. 2018 à 20 h 58
#12
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,855
Mentions "j'aime": 22,863
[
quote=Random2152;606471]Yeah, I have come to that conclusion also. I just cant help myself. Him and Pharrow....[/quote]

I just put non sensical posters on my ignore list. I go back to them later to see if their ways have changed. I obviously enjoy the banter and sometimes even the passionate conflict, but if I think a guy is deliberately argumentive or just constantly ignores facts......adios. There are enough well meaning folks on the site who I enjoy reading their opinions.
We seem to have a number of "large volume posters" who I wonder if they see any games except their home teams. No appreciation of other teams players at all.
12 oct. 2018 à 21 h 19
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: Random2152
Going to multi-quote you all here:
Lets go down the list yeah?
Winnipeg: Congrats, you found one of the best D cores in the league.
Washington: Statistically, about the same as the leafs, but the Leafs D core is much much cheaper.
Vegas: Worse than he Leafs. Being completely run over this year. They played a good team defence last year (using the trap), and that has broken down. This core has been exposed. Schmidt and Theodore are nice pieces tho.
Vancouver: Worse than he Leafs.
Tampa Bay: Overrated D. Hedman and Serg. Otherwise meh, McDonnah is not bad. Still better than the Leafs in some aspects, but the Leafs are better offensively. Slight advantage to Tampa. Also, Hedman should not have won Norris. Not even a top 10 Dman statistically last year.
St. Louis: Payako, Petrangelo are good. Otherwise its okay. Better than Leafs.
San Jose: 2 Norris winners and Vlasic this one is not even close, nor should it be. Better than Leafs.
Pittsburgh: Worse, and it is not even close. Letang is only slightly better than Gards at this point (offensively good, prone to turnovers, more physical), and Maata is too slow.
Philly: Two top prospects, otherwise crap. Ghost and Proverov will be great, but they are largely still in the same boat as the Leafs. In the near future, I will give them the edge, but overall, assuming everyone pans out on both team, it is pretty even. (Tor has better bottom 4, Philly has better top 2).
Ottawa: Worse than TOR. They have Chabot and not really much else. Chabot will be a stud, but I liken him to Rielly (given a few years development).
Rangers: Mixed bag. Shatty is crap, McQuaid is meh at best, Staal is ageing rapidly. Skjei is decent (I see him as a good 2LD), as is Poink, but overall missing top end talent. I am giving this one to the Leafs.
Islanders: Worse, and it isn't even close. Give your head a shake if you don't think this. There is a reason JT left.
Devils: I will be honest, I do not know a bunch about this core, I will defer this one.
Nashville: Congrats, you found one of the best D cores in the league.
Montreal: In a worse situation overall. Mete and Juulsen could become very good, Weber is still good when not injured, otherwise its meh at best. I am giving to the Leafs as Rielly is the deciding factor. Also, that Weber contract.. eughhh.
Wild: Better than the Leafs. Sutter, Spurgeon, Dumba... yeah.
LA: Has a great top end talent, not super enthusiastic about the rest of the core right now. Will defer as I do not know enough to make an accurate judgement.
Florida: I will give it to them. D is built for a different game, but I'd take FLA's D over TOR personally.
Edmonton: Bigger names, worse D. Leafs take this one. Nurse should be nice, Klefbom is good, and Larsson is okay. No real top end talent and rest of core is a drag. Rielly > Klef, Gards = Nurse (different play styles but in terms of value all else equal), Larsson > Zaitzev. TOR's depth is much better (Oz, Dermott, etc).
Detroit: Worse. Old guys slowly being ground into dust. A sad end to the Empire.
Dallas: An interesting lineup. Polak and Carrick make the depth worse. I think Rielly is going to break out this year, but for now, Klingberg > Rielly (slightly). Good prospects coming in. I'm calling even. Very similar core construction.
Jackets: Top end talent beats the leafs, full of depth Carlsson, Nuti, Savard. Better than Leafs.
Colorado: Good young talent. Solid top guys. Off the top of my head. Gards ~= Barrie (Barrie better at D, Gards better at O) Johnsson excellent shut down, Girard excellent pickup. In near future certainly better, right now its tough. Edge to Colorado as Rielly = Johnsson (diff players but value wise), Girard > Dermott.
Chicago: Worse. Big names, mostly ageing core. Keith is still okay, Joki looks good, but too many anchors.
Carolina: Better, just full of depth. Nice top end.
Calgary: Good top 4, better than Leafs.
Buffalo: Gards = Risto, Rielly = ? Good depth but Tor's is farther along developmentally. Leafs have it.
Boston: Ageing core, Chara is still decent, but overused. McAvoy will be a stud. Decent depth all around. Boston has it.
Arizona: OEL and Hjal are good, otherwise Meh. I'm calling about even. OEL > Rielly (but not by a huge amount), Gards < Hjal (again, not by much). Depth goes to TOR.
Anaheim: Yeah, ANA has a stacked D core.

Score:
13 teams are better than the Leafs (ANA,BOS,CAL,CAR,COL,CBJ,FLA,MIN,NSH,SAN,STL,TBL,WPG)
4 about even (ARI,DAL,PHI,WSH)
2 I deferred on due to lack of knowledge (LA,NJD)
11 Teams are worse than the Leafs (BUF,CHI,DET,EDM,MTL,NYI,NYR,OTT,PIT,VAN,VGK)

Would you look at that, about League average... who would have thought.


Nice break-down of things again ( on top of "Big 3" contracts one )
Random2152 a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2018 à 21 h 35
#14
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,337
Mentions "j'aime": 5,673
Quoting: palhal
[
quote=Random2152;606471]Yeah, I have come to that conclusion also. I just cant help myself. Him and Pharrow....

I just put non sensical posters on my ignore list. I go back to them later to see if their ways have changed. I obviously enjoy the banter and sometimes even the passionate conflict, but if I think a guy is deliberately argumentive or just constantly ignores facts......adios. There are enough well meaning folks on the site who I enjoy reading their opinions.
We seem to have a number of "large volume posters" who I wonder if they see any games except their home teams. No appreciation of other teams players at all.


Personally, I just don't believe in blocking people. If I don't like it, just ignore. Often I take the bait anyways because that's just the way I am. For example, I am currently arguing in the Shattenkirk trade (Leafs ACGM) about whether Shatty is any good (OP wants to trade Nylander plus for Shatty lol).
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage