SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

11 Forwards, 7 D-man (Read Description)

Créé par: tmljk22
Équipe: 2018-19 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 2 août 2018
Publié: 2 août 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
As everyone knows, the Leafs will potentially be having some cap problems next season with the signings of Matthews and Marner. Many are pushing for the acquisition of a top pairing RHD. Though there is really no point in spending a potential point-a-game player in Nylander.

An alternative approach Babcock could choose to take is the 11 forwards, 7 d-man. This would eliminate the movement of 4 lines, and instead allow Babcock to pick and chose the placement of bottom six players like Brown, Kapanen, Johnsson, and either Ennis or Lindholm. Slotting them into positions for success. This also allows them to use their 7th D, potentially Holl, on the penalty kill allowing Hainsey and Zaitzev to play more 5 on 5 minutes more effectively.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
76 500 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $68 483 333 $2 550 000 $5 400 000 $11 016 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 août 2018 à 18 h 14
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,458
Mentions "j'aime": 25,356
Is it just me, or are there 13 forwards and 8 defensemen? Anyway, I'm giving you 5 stars for the outside-the-box thinking.
tmljk22 a aimé ceci.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 16
#2
Démarrer sujet
tmljk22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Is it just me, or are there 13 forwards and 8 defensemen? Anyway, I'm giving you 5 stars for the outside-the-box thinking.


They are just replacement players. The first 11 forwards and 7 defensemen are the ones to really worry about.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 19
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6
Mentions "j'aime": 2
I like the idea enough for 5 stars, but I just don't know if Babcock would actually do it since he has a history of liking to run 4 lines.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 21
#4
Démarrer sujet
tmljk22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: toronto67
I like the idea enough for 5 stars, but I just don't know if Babcock would actually do it since he has a history of liking to run 4 lines.


Ya I thought about that too but still I think this would take mins off of both Hainsey and Zaitzev. They both typically play like 70% of the PK
2 août 2018 à 18 h 23
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 665
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Is it just me, or are there 13 forwards and 8 defensemen? Anyway, I'm giving you 5 stars for the outside-the-box thinking.


Yeah this really isn't outside the box thinking (unless he wrote the article). It's been discussed before:
https://mapleleafshotstove.com/2018/07/09/leafs-notebook-john-tavares-edition-matchup-implications-11-7-cap-crunching-can-more-offense-help-the-defense/
tmljk22, OldNYIfan et habs_fan123 a aimé ceci.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 25
#6
I put math in hockey
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 624
Mentions "j'aime": 167
Glad to see another person taking the Leafs away from conventional lineup construction. That said, I think you put too much emphasis on shutting other teams down rather than being the team other teams need to shut down. Also, if you want PK help, Marincin > Holl.
tmljk22 a aimé ceci.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 28
#7
Démarrer sujet
tmljk22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: The_Ultimate_Pielord
Glad to see another person taking the Leafs away from conventional lineup construction. That said, I think you put too much emphasis on shutting other teams down rather than being the team other teams need to shut down. Also, if you want PK help, Marincin > Holl.


That's true, but I don't think Babcock is the biggest fan of Marincin.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 28
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,713
Mentions "j'aime": 22,769
Leafs don't have problem on defence with their top 5 guys....it's getting one of Carrick, Holl, Ozhiganov (all RHD) or Borgman and Rosen to be competent NHLers playing big minutes a game. And due to injury. teams need seven or eight competent Dmen during got course of the season. But finding seven competent NHL Dmen is not jus a problem for the Leafs, probably 25 teams are searching.

I would like to see when the top seven are decided upon, that the 6th and 7th guys rotate in and out of the lineup so they get NHL playing time.

In your original statement. You mentioned Holl. He is not an aggressive Dman. Maybe having Hainsey as one of your designated PK only (similar to last year) might be the way to go, and then play the other six guys. If Marner plays right point on the PP, that keeps at least one RHD a little fresher to play five on five or PK
OldNYIfan et tmljk22 a aimé ceci.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 29
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,458
Mentions "j'aime": 25,356
Quoting: Goldendelicious
Yeah this really isn't outside the box thinking (unless he wrote the article). It's been discussed before:
https://mapleleafshotstove.com/2018/07/09/leafs-notebook-john-tavares-edition-matchup-implications-11-7-cap-crunching-can-more-offense-help-the-defense/


It's outside MY box.
tmljk22 a aimé ceci.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 29
#10
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,458
Mentions "j'aime": 25,356
Quoting: tmljk22
That's true, but I don't think Babcock isn't the biggest fan of Marincin.


Okay, you're barred from using double negatives for a month.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 30
#11
Démarrer sujet
tmljk22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: palhal
Leafs don't have problem on defence with their top 5 guys....it's getting one of Carrick, Holl, Ozhiganov (all RHD) or Borgman and Rosen to be competent NHLers playing big minutes a game. And due to injury. teams need seven or eight competent Dmen during got course of the season. But finding seven competent NHL Dmen is not jus a problem for the Leafs, probably 25 teams are searching.

I would like to see when the top seven are decided upon, that the 6th and 7th guys rotate in and out of the lineup so they get NHL playing time.

In your original statement. You mentioned Holl. He is not an aggressive Dman. Maybe having Hainsey as one of your designated PK only (similar to last year) might be the way to go, and then play the other six guys. If Marner plays right point on the PP, that keeps at least one RHD a little fresher to play five on five or PK


Ya for sure, I just thought that one of the biggest problems with Hainsey's game in the back half of the season last year was just fatigue from playing almost all of the PK mins.
palhal et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 31
#12
Démarrer sujet
tmljk22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Okay, you're barred from using double negatives for a month.


Lmao didn't notice
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 août 2018 à 18 h 35
#13
robg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 14
Mentions "j'aime": 1
No way nylander signs for 6.5 mil if it's anywhere more than 5 years.

something more realistic would be like a 2x5 bridge contract or 8x8.5 long term deal

in the end their defense will be the reason they won't advance far in the playoffs, even the tavares signing can't help that
2 août 2018 à 18 h 36
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: rgeiger
No way nylander signs for 6.5 mil if it's anywhere more than 5 years.

something more realistic would be like a 2x5 bridge contract or 8x8.5 long term deal

in the end their defense will be the reason they won't advance far in the playoffs, even the tavares signing can't help that


I think 8 is too much and 6 is too little
2 août 2018 à 18 h 38
#15
Démarrer sujet
tmljk22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: rgeiger
No way nylander signs for 6.5 mil if it's anywhere more than 5 years.

something more realistic would be like a 2x5 bridge contract or 8x8.5 long term deal

in the end their defense will be the reason they won't advance far in the playoffs, even the tavares signing can't help that


The post was made for the lineup not his contract. Though I don't think 6.5 is too far off
3 août 2018 à 10 h 25
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
It's not an original idea since TSN mentioned this the day Tavares was signed. Plagiarism isn't cool.

Now onto the proposal listed above.

Its an interesting concept and one area where I'll give you props is by including Lindholm. My thought was when I first heard TSN mention this was why bother having a 4th line centre. Just give Kadri, Matthews and Tavares 20 mins each and not dress a 4C. However what happens if one of them gets hurt? You could move Nylander over, but if you put Lindholm as a winger on the 4th line, he can slide over to spell the other 3 when need be. That is an interesting concept.

Its all moot though because I think Babcock is too traditional and he'll roll 4 lines out since the 4th line will be better than a lot of 3rd lines, TO will roll over a lot of teams. Also having 4 full lines keeps guys fresh and as a guy who plays a lot of hockey, the fresher you are the more effect you will be.
3 août 2018 à 13 h 4
#17
Démarrer sujet
tmljk22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: LoganOllivier
It's not an original idea since TSN mentioned this the day Tavares was signed. Plagiarism isn't cool.

Now onto the proposal listed above.

Its an interesting concept and one area where I'll give you props is by including Lindholm. My thought was when I first heard TSN mention this was why bother having a 4th line centre. Just give Kadri, Matthews and Tavares 20 mins each and not dress a 4C. However what happens if one of them gets hurt? You could move Nylander over, but if you put Lindholm as a winger on the 4th line, he can slide over to spell the other 3 when need be. That is an interesting concept.

Its all moot though because I think Babcock is too traditional and he'll roll 4 lines out since the 4th line will be better than a lot of 3rd lines, TO will roll over a lot of teams. Also having 4 full lines keeps guys fresh and as a guy who plays a lot of hockey, the fresher you are the more effect you will be.


I get where you are coming from but I never claimed this idea to be my own. I was just expressing how I would like to see it happen. It is also an alternative to what many post here.
3 août 2018 à 13 h 7
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: tmljk22
I get where you are coming from but I never claimed this idea to be my own. I was just expressing how I would like to see it happen. It is also an alternative to what many post here.


Totally.

I still don't think its the best idea because its a tad too chaotic. I'd rather see 4 lines rolling.

I do really like the idea of trading Gardiner since we aren't keeping him next year anyways and then moving Hainsey to the left side of the 3rd pairing with Carrick or Holl or something. But that would only work if one of the young guys shows good chemistry with Rielly. Holl or Ozhiganov could make that happen and then Hainsey can be the PK specialist but not play as much 5v5 where he got wrecked towards the end of the season.
tmljk22 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage