SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big moves to fill the big holes

Créé par: Matt2406
Équipe: 2017-18 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 1 févr. 2018
Publié: 1 févr. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Improves the D, upgrades LW and does so without trashing the future.
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Roy, Kevin
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (NJD)
2.
ANA
  1. Galchenyuk, Alex
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (MTL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de ANA
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2275 000 000 $69 753 417 $0 $700 000 $5 246 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
637 500 $637 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 5
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance700 000 $$700K)
DG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 févr. 2018 à 5 h 38
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Underpayment for Hjalmarsson. I think it needs to be a 2nd round pick for ARI to consider it (so long as we're on Hjalmarsson's 10 team trade list). If we're in a playoff spot at the TDL, I'd pay Roy + 2nd for Hjalmarsson.

The Galc deal has a bunch of throw-ins with no real value i.e. Ritchie, Kossila, Holzer. Basically, it's Kase + 1st for Galc + 2nd. I'm not sure MTL will think the moving up a few spots in the draft will be worth swapping Galc for Kase. At the same time, I don't think it's a great idea to move Kase at this point. He's on the verge of breaking out and brings that work ethic we need more of in this team. I know Galc is better right now, but is it really significant enough to be worth the risk? I mean, for all we know, Kase could end up a better player than Galc.

Also, you've had to move Rakell from the #1LW position to even fit Galc in. Why? Rakell is a LW and excels in that position. Why move Rakell from a position he dominates to fit in a new player? It just sounds to me like we just don't need Galc.
Campa96 a aimé ceci.
1 févr. 2018 à 6 h 41
#2
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: mytduxfan
Underpayment for Hjalmarsson. I think it needs to be a 2nd round pick for ARI to consider it (so long as we're on Hjalmarsson's 10 team trade list). If we're in a playoff spot at the TDL, I'd pay Roy + 2nd for Hjalmarsson.

The Galc deal has a bunch of throw-ins with no real value i.e. Ritchie, Kossila, Holzer. Basically, it's Kase + 1st for Galc + 2nd. I'm not sure MTL will think the moving up a few spots in the draft will be worth swapping Galc for Kase. At the same time, I don't think it's a great idea to move Kase at this point. He's on the verge of breaking out and brings that work ethic we need more of in this team. I know Galc is better right now, but is it really significant enough to be worth the risk? I mean, for all we know, Kase could end up a better player than Galc.

Also, you've had to move Rakell from the #1LW position to even fit Galc in. Why? Rakell is a LW and excels in that position. Why move Rakell from a position he dominates to fit in a new player? It just sounds to me like we just don't need Galc.


I probably like Kase more than many Ducks fans and I wouldn't make that trade. We don't particularly need him either.

Morand might be something to include, since I know Steel will cause people to have aneurysms.
Larsson or Peterssen (sp?) are considerations as well.
I don't see Galchenyuk moving without more immediate help however.
Campa96 a aimé ceci.
1 févr. 2018 à 7 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: ricochetii
I probably like Kase more than many Ducks fans and I wouldn't make that trade. We don't particularly need him either.

Morand might be something to include, since I know Steel will cause people to have aneurysms.
Larsson or Peterssen (sp?) are considerations as well.
I don't see Galchenyuk moving without more immediate help however.


Yeah, didn't think so. I mean, Kase is younger, but only by like a year or 2, and Galc is only 24 years old this year. Even if you go in full rebuild mode, you don't move a 24 year old player who would be what? 28-30 years old once you've finished re-stocking. Personally, I don't see Galc getting moved unless its for a massive return or for an equivalent player also in need of a change of scenery.

I wouldn't be against moving Morand, Larsson or Petersson for the right player. However, I do worry that our D depth is slowly being whittled away.
1 févr. 2018 à 8 h 22
#4
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: mytduxfan
Yeah, didn't think so. I mean, Kase is younger, but only by like a year or 2, and Galc is only 24 years old this year. Even if you go in full rebuild mode, you don't move a 24 year old player who would be what? 28-30 years old once you've finished re-stocking. Personally, I don't see Galc getting moved unless its for a massive return or for an equivalent player also in need of a change of scenery.

I wouldn't be against moving Morand, Larsson or Petersson for the right player. However, I do worry that our D depth is slowly being whittled away.


Your D core is strong right now, and should be for a number of years. Plenty of time to restock. You haven't needed to trade or sign a UFA for a while either, so I don't blame you if you forgot that was an option. laugh
1 févr. 2018 à 9 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: ricochetii
Your D core is strong right now, and should be for a number of years. Plenty of time to restock. You haven't needed to trade or sign a UFA for a while either, so I don't blame you if you forgot that was an option. laugh


It's ok. We still don't have a true #1D. Lindholm is more of a top pairing D-man right now than an out-and-out #1D. Therefore, we need to rely on our depth, playing 3 solid D pairings. That's why I'm hesitant move Larsson because we could use him in the line-up next season:

Lindholm (#1-2 D) - Montour (#4 D)
Fowler (#2 D) - Manson (#3-4 D)
Larsson (#6 D) - Hjalmarsson/Pysyk (#3-4 D)

I know this would be godly depth, but I think it's necessary when you consider what NSH is playing:

Josi (#1-2 D) - Ryan Ellis (#3-4 D)
Emelin (#4-5 D) - Subban (#1-2 D)
Ekholm (#3-4 D) - Irwin (#5-6 D)

And with the current playoff format, we're more than likely going to have to face NSH at some point.

I can't remember the last time we had a good signing, especially on D. Beauchemin has been ok this season and Holzer has been decent at times, but before that we had Stoner, Souray, Allen, etc. All terrible. I think trade is the way to go, but, at the same time, I think good D-men like Hjalmarsson and maybe Pysyk (if he's available) are going to demand a 1st. That would sting, but I'd consider paying it. Hjalmarsson, in particular, would really solidify our back-end and help our younger guys development.
HockeyNM1510 a aimé ceci.
1 févr. 2018 à 10 h 35
#6
#LeafsFever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,787
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Honestly, with the group that Anaheim is, pending good health, I am not sure I would make any big or major changes. I really like their group, and adding Henrique to center depth that includes Getzalf and Kesler, when healthy, is pretty incredible, considering all the pieces they were still able to keep.
1 févr. 2018 à 10 h 44
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 2,161
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Kase Trade is horrible. Why would you trade Kase? It’s insanely dumb. WAY too much for Galchenyuk. DUCKS ARENT TRADING KASE. STOP
1 févr. 2018 à 11 h 12
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 473
Mentions "j'aime": 72
The Hjalmarsson trade would work if you changed that 3rd to a 2nd. Remember that Hjalmarsson got traded for peanuts. Roy is a future top 9 forward with speed and skill, perfect for today's NHL (kinda pissed that he's not being played on the current Ducks roster) and this draft is real deep so the 2nd is pretty valuable.

That Galch trade, however, is a huuuuuugggee overpay, I might not give Kase for Galch straight up.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage