SalarySwishSalarySwish

Next Year

Créé par: DFinn91
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 25 mars 2024
Publié: 26 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
33 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
56 250 000 $
27 250 000 $
46 500 000 $
57 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Burroughs, Kyle
  2. Kunin, Luke [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
3.
PIT
  1. Ferraro, Mario
  2. Gushchin, Daniil
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
4.
SJS
  1. Lundkvist, Nils [Droits de RFA]
DAL
5.
SJS
  1. Sheary, Conor
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de NJD
Logo de TBL
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $77 274 342 $0 $1 307 500 $10 425 658 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 2
Celebrini, Macklin
950 000 $950 000 $
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
RFA
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 mars à 17 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,254
Mentions "j'aime": 3,692
San Jose isn’t trading multiple 2nds, young nhlers and prospects for older players
26 mars à 17 h 37
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,833
Mentions "j'aime": 7,410
Why would the leafs downgrade two players for a 2nd?
26 mars à 17 h 41
#3
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,034
Mentions "j'aime": 896
I like Ferraro's game as much if not more than Pettersson. Adding a 2nd and one the Sharks best and most NHL ready prospects to that is just crazy.

I like Liljegren but the 33rd overall pick is FAR too much for him.

Emberson has been fantastic when healthy. I'd prefer him over over Lundkqvist.

Tampa one I just can't understand. Getting the worse contract only to healthy scratch him
26 mars à 17 h 55
#4
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,114
Mentions "j'aime": 1,389
Quoting: AStovetop
I like Ferraro's game as much if not more than Pettersson. Adding a 2nd and one the Sharks best and most NHL ready prospects to that is just crazy.

I like Liljegren but the 33rd overall pick is FAR too much for him.

Emberson has been fantastic when healthy. I'd prefer him over over Lundkqvist.

Tampa one I just can't understand. Getting the worse contract only to healthy scratch him


You might. But 32/32 NHL GMs don't. Including Dubas and Grier. So adding would be necessary. Pettersson is an underrated elite defensive dman that elevates everyone he plays with. I think that is actually approaching a fair trade, though probably reduce the 2nd to a 3rd. However, it makes zero sense from SJS perspective. And if PIT is trading Pettersson, it makes more sense to just get futures because roster players are almost guaranteed to be wasted on a rebuild.
pens1991 a aimé ceci.
26 mars à 19 h 5
#5
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,034
Mentions "j'aime": 896
Quoting: jfkst1
You might. But 32/32 NHL GMs don't. Including Dubas and Grier. So adding would be necessary. Pettersson is an underrated elite defensive dman that elevates everyone he plays with. I think that is actually approaching a fair trade, though probably reduce the 2nd to a 3rd. However, it makes zero sense from SJS perspective. And if PIT is trading Pettersson, it makes more sense to just get futures because roster players are almost guaranteed to be wasted on a rebuild.


Pettersson is the better player right now no doubt, but I don't think it's as wide of a gap as many think it is between him and Ferraro though. And I said I like Ferraro's GAME better. I think his role as a player/leader is more needed to this Sharks team than Pettersson. Add that Pettersson's d-partners have almost exclusively been Karlsson, Letang, Petry (when he was still playing at a high level) and Marino. Ferraro's stats astronomically improve when he has a d-partner of similar caliber.

I agree, Ferraro + 3rd is probably Pettersson's value from an on-ice play perspective, but Ferraro is also a huge leader in the lockerroom. My point is they're somewhat close in value and role, so its a marginal upgrade. So to also give up what's practically a first and a borderline untouchable prospect is absolutely bonkers
Voir tout