SalarySwishSalarySwish

Busy Week

Créé par: KennyBoi
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 4 mars 2024
Publié: 4 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
EDM can get a third team to retain on JD for a $1M caphit. Save their high picks for a bigger trade.

BOS will have plenty of caproom next season. If retaining on Ullmark helps LA pull the trigger on that trade then do it.

BOS should look at adding a vet middle 6 winger on the cheap with decent upside.

BOS apparently in the market for D depth. I'm personally fine if they stand pat, but whatever.
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Holloway, Dylan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
EDM
  1. DeBrusk, Jake (2 000 000 $ retained)
2.
BOS
  1. Kaliyev, Arthur
  2. Rittich, David
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Ullmark, Linus (1 500 000 $ retained)
3.
WSH
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (BOS)
4.
BOS
  1. Beauvillier, Anthony (1 500 000 $ retained)
CHI
  1. Spicer, Cole [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de EDM
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $81 652 501 $4 500 000 $862 500 $1 847 499 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

4 mars à 16 h 43
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,478
Mentions "j'aime": 4,511
Eh Kings pass, Ulmark has a lower save % than both of the Kings goalies, also over Ullmarks last 4 starts he hasn't cleared a .900 SV%. If the Kings are spending 1sts they also will need to offload a $3-4M contract to make the money work.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 16 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,739
Mentions "j'aime": 10,616
Hawks decline and counter w/ Beau retained for the '24 4th.
Garak a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 17 h 6
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,828
Mentions "j'aime": 1,185
Quoting: tryger
Eh Kings pass, Ulmark has a lower save % than both of the Kings goalies, also over Ullmarks last 4 starts he hasn't cleared a .900 SV%. If the Kings are spending 1sts they also will need to offload a $3-4M contract to make the money work.


To be fair the GsaX is substantially different (Ullmark is 6th with goalies with atleast 30 starts and Talbott is 14th).

The Kings frankly protect their goalie where the Bruins depend on their goalies to protect them, which is consistently different method.

Not disputing your assertion that this hasn’t hurt the kings, but using save % is really incomplete
Chirping_in_112 a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 17 h 54
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,478
Mentions "j'aime": 4,511
Quoting: Celtics21
To be fair the GsaX is substantially different (Ullmark is 6th with goalies with atleast 30 starts and Talbott is 14th).

The Kings frankly protect their goalie where the Bruins depend on their goalies to protect them, which is consistently different method.

Not disputing your assertion that this hasn’t hurt the kings, but using save % is really incomplete


Talbot has been inconsistent the same could be argued for Ullmark.

The two goalies worth a 1st (Saros and Ullmark) have not played there best this season, be it bad luck or defensive breakdowns. But LA has recently seen their tandem play very well since the coaching change except one game really. From LAs point of view they would need to pay handsomely for a goalie which they can’t fit under there cap, so probably likely to continue playing with their tandem.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 17 h 56
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,828
Mentions "j'aime": 1,185
Modifié 4 mars à 18 h 12
Quoting: tryger
Talbot has been inconsistent the same could be argued for Ullmark.

The two goalies worth a 1st (Saros and Ullmark) have not played there best this season, be it bad luck or defensive breakdowns. But LA has recently seen their tandem play very well since the coaching change except one game really. From LAs point of view they would need to pay handsomely for a goalie which they can’t fit under there cap, so probably likely to continue playing with their tandem.


The only Ullmark to the Kings deal I see is one that is based on Rob Blake wanting to get off of the PLD contract. Otherwise, that’s one team I’ve penned off the trade possibility group.

I’d take Ullmark’s GSAX in any year and wouldn’t call this a down year. Just not up to historical rates last year. His bench rates are solid.

I like what Rittich has been doing and you should see if it is real or not.
tryger a aimé ceci.
Voir tout