SalarySwishSalarySwish

Less terrible next year

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 30 janv. 2024
Publié: 30 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Not any crazy moves but a step forward. Hawks get 2nd or 3rd overall and select either Lindstrom or Demidov
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
84 750 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
idea has been floating around the internet. The hawks would be for it, but we're not giving more than a late pick if anything. Moving off the 5.5M for a guy that's a semi regular healthy scratch is way more important to VAN than getting a few extra goals. We'd just sign a free agent with our 35M in cap if the price is any more than this
2.
CHI
  1. Kuznetsov, Evgeny
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
WSH
3.
CHI
  1. Spence, Jordan [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
make room for Clarke, Roy clearly isn't going anywhere and LA seems unwilling to try one of these guys on the left
LAK
  1. Kaiser, Wyatt
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
a little more than the Durzi return
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de BOS
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2288 500 000 $69 753 333 $0 $4 557 500 $18 746 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

30 janv. à 9 h 34
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,651
Mentions "j'aime": 9,781
Good thoughts. Agreed that a guy like Eberle would be better as a UFA than sending anything more to VAN for Kuz. I'd be open to that LAK trade. Curious to get their thoughts. If we're drafting #2, I'd throw Levshunov into the mix. I worry a bit about Lindstrom that high up.

The one thing I can't see is Kuznetsov. Even with the 2nd, his history of CoCo Kuzy is something the Hawks organization won't approve.
Garak, Earth et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 9 h 34
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,638
Mentions "j'aime": 5,788
Only part I don't like is Kuznetsov. Not the type of player I want around a young team.
Garak et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 10 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,349
Mentions "j'aime": 3,418
A line of two Kuzy's and Frank Nazar is how you ensure a line is a -35 by the end of the season
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 10 h 13
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,812
Mentions "j'aime": 10,565
Quoting: exo2769
Good thoughts. Agreed that a guy like Eberle would be better as a UFA than sending anything more to VAN for Kuz. I'd be open to that LAK trade. Curious to get their thoughts. If we're drafting #2, I'd throw Levshunov into the mix. I worry a bit about Lindstrom that high up.

The one thing I can't see is Kuznetsov. Even with the 2nd, his history of CoCo Kuzy is something the Hawks organization won't approve.


Quick notes on Levshunov. I disagree with including him in the 2nd overall conversation. Watch the new Scouching 2024 draft rankings video that was live last night. When they get to 10 or 11th OA, they convey the same feeling I have on Levshunov. I was very high on him going into this season, but the more I've seen, the more my mind has changed.

A lot of his success has more to do with the VERY specific way MSU's coach uses him. He is not good defensively, and the coach has him paying close attention to when the puck is transitioning out of the offensive zone and immediately has him going to the bench and changing, actively avoiding defensive play whenever possible. I thought maybe I was crazy so I kept watching games and it's the same thing over and over. Plus, when he actually does get caught in his own zone he looks lost and soft. The fact that his goal differential is as good as it is, is a miracle.

He isn't even that great offensively, either, other than the occasional flash of skill, he benefits from getting puck touches that turn into assists. Now this isn't me saying he isn't good, but just giving examples of why he isn't worthy of a top 5 pick and definitely not 2nd overall. I think he will still be a good defenseman eventually, but the hype is all smoke in mirrors and people looking at his point totals while ignoring the rest.

Technically, Levshunov and Rinzel are at the same point in their development and they aren't as far apart in age as being two drafts apart would lead most to believe. In the Minnesota vs MSU series this past weekend, Rinzel was BY FAR the better RD. We don't need to waste a top pick on D this year. Every day Levshunov is getting more exposed, and I don't think he will go that early at all.
30 janv. à 10 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,812
Mentions "j'aime": 10,565
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
Only part I don't like is Kuznetsov. Not the type of player I want around a young team.


100%
Voir tout