SalarySwishSalarySwish

Nucks

Créé par: Sjohns8888
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2023
Publié: 23 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Trade 1. Columbus gets a scoring forward which they need and Vancouver dumps salary and gets a good young defenceman. Both players seem to be on the outs with their teams

2. Vancouver moves back 4 picks in a deep draft and gets rid of Myers 6 mil. Pittsburgh adds a serviceable D for a year and moves up in the draft.

3. Chicago gets some skill to build around Bedard. Garland benefits from a change in scenery. They have an abundance of picks, late 2nd won’t hurt to give up.

4. Arizona uses some of their draft capital to get a young puck moving defencemen for cheap. Bear becomes expendable with Boqvist and the FA signings.

FA signings
Van has rumoured interest in each of those players except Freddy. Pay them each a little bit more than market value.

Demko and Freddy’s injury history is a concern but that’s a pretty solid 1/2 punch if they can stay healthy.

Fire away!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
22 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
34 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Myers, Tyler
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
4.
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de TBL
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de DET
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de FLA
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $75 167 917 $850 000 $850 000 $8 332 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

23 juin 2023 à 12 h 16
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,141
Mentions "j'aime": 1,483
Modifié 23 juin 2023 à 12 h 22
Every trade is rejected by the other team immediately. Productive 22 year old RHD on a reasonable contract don't get traded for wingers. 6 million dumps don't happen for 3 spots in the draft....even that part of the 1st. Hawks are not paying for Garland (they MIGHT take himf or free if part of something bigger they like). Bear isn't worth a 2nd, much less a 2nd when he won't be available until Dec/Jan.
BrockChoy et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2023 à 12 h 21
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,145
Mentions "j'aime": 387
cbj pass.
SK101 et BoomerTheHero a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2023 à 12 h 35
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 1,952
CBJ pass mostly because Boeser would be redundant with Laine and Marchenko already. He'd be playing bottom 6, so it doesn't really fit/fill a need/upgrade what we have.
BrockChoy, SK101 et BoomerTheHero a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2023 à 12 h 47
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 89
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: wojohawk
Every trade is rejected by the other team immediately. Productive 22 year old RHD on a reasonable contract don't get traded for wingers. 6 million dumps don't happen for 3 spots in the draft....even that part of the 1st. Hawks are not paying for Garland (they MIGHT take himf or free if part of something bigger they like). Bear isn't worth a 2nd, much less a 2nd when he won't be available until Dec/Jan.


With the addition of Severson and Provorov CBJ is going to have to move a defencemen. It’s probably Boqvist or Bean. Flipping Boqvist gets you a top 6 ppg winger who’s only 26 (is team controlled for a few years on a good contract so you don’t risk losing him in FA). Strengthens the offence after they made moves to bolster the backend.

Moving up 3 spots and taking 1 year of 6 mil is a smart move. Pitt has the cap and Myers is a good defencemen just isn’t a top pairing guy. Play him lower down the lineup against better matchups and special teams. It’s a great trade for them. If he had more years I’d agree but it’s only one year and fills a need for Pitt with dumolin probably gone. Maybe add some retention but I don’t think it’s too far off.

I agree with the garland move. Maybe a bit to high of a pick but I think he’s a perfect target for them to play alongside Bedard. Still only 27, not a terrible contract (length or $ wise). Can play top 6 role/PP. they can also trade him with retention once his stock raises a bit.

Bear trade came with an extension and he’s a promising young d. Report just came out saying Arizona is targeting cap strapped teams to pick up young NHL talent. Figured he falls perfectly into that category.
23 juin 2023 à 12 h 57
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,141
Mentions "j'aime": 1,483
Quoting: Sjohns8888
With the addition of Severson and Provorov CBJ is going to have to move a defencemen. It’s probably Boqvist or Bean. Flipping Boqvist gets you a top 6 ppg winger who’s only 26 (is team controlled for a few years on a good contract so you don’t risk losing him in FA). Strengthens the offence after they made moves to bolster the backend.

Moving up 3 spots and taking 1 year of 6 mil is a smart move. Pitt has the cap and Myers is a good defencemen just isn’t a top pairing guy. Play him lower down the lineup against better matchups and special teams. It’s a great trade for them. If he had more years I’d agree but it’s only one year and fills a need for Pitt with dumolin probably gone. Maybe add some retention but I don’t think it’s too far off.

I agree with the garland move. Maybe a bit to high of a pick but I think he’s a perfect target for them to play alongside Bedard. Still only 27, not a terrible contract (length or $ wise). Can play top 6 role/PP. they can also trade him with retention once his stock raises a bit.

Bear trade came with an extension and he’s a promising young d. Report just came out saying Arizona is targeting cap strapped teams to pick up young NHL talent. Figured he falls perfectly into that category.


Boeser makes 6.5 large and CBus is an internal budget team. Provorov is there because the Kings are retaining on him to dump Petersen. Severson because he took a decent extension. Boeser is overpaid by 500K-1 million for the 65 games he will be healthy for and the 55 points he'll put up.

The value of that pick swap is a very late 2nd (like pick #60). No one is taking a 6 million cap dump for a late 2nd especially not Pitts which is in win now mode with Crosby/Malkin/Petry/Letang all the wrong side of 35 and a new GM. If you pay Myers bonus and are only dumping 1 million in salary and 6 in cap, you might get the Hawks, Arizona, Detroit to bite for a 3rd/4th. But at the draft before that bonus is paid and there are 6 million real dollars on top of the cap....late 2nd won;t do it.

Hawks will play Bedard with Reichel and Trad or pick someone up with a little size and grit to pair with them. Garland is the wrong shape and size given Bedard, Reichel, and their first last year Nazar are all similar (smallish).

Bear is a bottom pairing guy out for half the year....not getting a 2nd for him.
Voir tout