SalarySwishSalarySwish

Same goal Different Strategy

Créé par: Sagecoll
Équipe: 2022-23 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 17 juin 2022
Publié: 28 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
General Concept: In spite of advancing well into the playoffs primarily on the back of elite goaltending and special teams (Similar to the mid 2010's AV run squads), Rangers 5v5 play was very poor. They were bottom 5 in the league in several 5v5 metrics measuring possession scoring chances, etc.

From the data tracking and video tape it became clear that most of the problems were starting from the back end and in transition. NYR were one of the worst in the league at conceding the blue line, had the 2nd most zone clears in the league, and were towards the bottom of the league in terms of exiting the zone with control and entering the offensive zone with control.
In practice, what that looks like (which should be all too familiar to Ranger fans) is the opposition easily getting into our zone, firing off a bunch of shots, Igor doing heroic work to keep them out of our goal, and a dman chipping the puck out to center for the same thing to happen all over again.
The fix is pretty simple tbh, revamp the back end to feature Dmen who can handle the puck under pressure and move it with control. As well as replacing the bottom 6 with players who can also control the puck effectively while doing all the stuff you'd expect a 4th line to do. I think this roster accomplishes that.


Trade Rationale:
1) Lindgren and Sanheim with extension value is pretty comparable. Lindgren also fits the Torts mold a bit better. Goodrow vs. Laughton is also pretty close, Laughton brings a bit more offensively. Goodrow brings more flexibility in the lineup and positionally, he's been healthier and has considerably more playoff experience. Reaves evens out the edges.
2) Buffalo needs some goaltending, Georgiev's record as a starter is very impressive. This avoids the need for a big swing on a UFA goaltender that almost never works out. Cost avoids any significant draft picks or prospects for Buffalo. Mutually beneficial.
3, Arizona avoids a large portion of Schmaltz's heavily back loaded contract and gets a better D prospect than they'd get for just about anyone not named Chychrun. They open up even more cap space so ownership can take on more dead weight for their never ending tank.
4. Trouba goes back to the midwest and Burke/Hexstall gets the big all situations Dman they crave. Price is actually a bit below market value -> This is less than what Risto got. Seattle takes on less than a mil in retention to go get what for them is a top 6 winger. Pitt still has enough cap left at that point to keep at least one of Tang/Malkin if not both.
5. Chicago avoids having to send a sweetener to take Toews and nets a 2nd and Blais who slides into their 3rd line in the process. This is a bit more than what Keith got. Additional picks and stuff to make cap work.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 450 000 $
33 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
11 250 000 $
32 850 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Laughton, Scott
  2. Sanheim, Travis
Détails additionnels:
Sanheim signs ~5.5mil x 6 extension.
2.
NYR
  1. Asplund, Rasmus
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [Droits de RFA]
3.
NYR
  1. Schmaltz, Nick (1 850 000 $ retained)
ARI
  1. Schneider, Braden
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
4.
NYR
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
3way Deal:

NYR gets: Pit 1st + Will Borgen
Pitt gets: Trouba (750k retained by Seattle)
Seattle gets: Kapanen
5.
6.
NYR
  1. Toews, Jonathan (5 250 000 $ retained)
CHI
  1. Blais, Samuel
  2. Nemeth, Patrik
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $79 024 802 $0 $4 100 000 $3 475 198 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
875 000 $875 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 675 000 $4 675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 3
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

28 juin 2022 à 14 h 16
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 327
Mentions "j'aime": 232
Buffalo doesn't even look at the phone
wojme, mac11_716, Shibbal18 and 2 others a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2022 à 14 h 18
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,639
Mentions "j'aime": 5,880
Easy decline from the sabres. "Georgiev's record as a starter is very impressive" but his stats aren't.
Bond007, Shibbal18, sabres89 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2022 à 14 h 20
#3
Funksoljah
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,021
Mentions "j'aime": 1,222
Georgievs record is far from impressive, and treating Asplund like a toss in is silly. Asplund is an important player for the Sabres and is one of their best defensive forwards, they won't deal him for a goalie who wasn't much better than the 6 others they had to play this past season. Asplund is more valuable to Buffalo than to another team.
Bond007, Shibbal18, wojme and 2 others a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2022 à 14 h 31
#4
who? what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 202
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Philly is definitely out on this. I get the Laughton/Goodrow comparison. No way Lindgren and Reaves equals Sanheim.
Farabee a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2022 à 14 h 36
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,730
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: Funksoljah
Georgievs record is far from impressive, and treating Asplund like a toss in is silly. Asplund is an important player for the Sabres and is one of their best defensive forwards, they won't deal him for a goalie who wasn't much better than the 6 others they had to play this past season. Asplund is more valuable to Buffalo than to another team.


If he was a toss in, the pick would be a 2nd. Again, as a starter (under 4 days rest) Georgiev's numbers were pretty great and have been any time he's in that scenario for his entire career. Asplund's no throw in, but to act like Georgiev doesn't immediately slot into #1 on the depth chart displays a lack of understanding of the position.
Voir tout