SalarySwishSalarySwish

a little rougher around the edges

Créé par: leafs101
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 6 déc. 2021
Publié: 6 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Manson, Josh (2 000 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Clutterbuck, Cal (1 750 000 $ retained)
NYI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
3.
SEA
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
4.
TOR
  1. Jones, Martin
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PHI)
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (PHI)
PHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
5.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
6.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
if preds are in playoff hunt still
7.
TOR
  1. Tokarski, Dustin
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Ritchie, Nick
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de PHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de PHI
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 383 116 $0 $400 000 $3 116 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
50 000 $50 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

6 déc. 2021 à 1 h 12
#1
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
Nobody is taking Mrazek at this point. That contract was awful, should've traded a 2nd for Nedeljkovic instead.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 déc. 2021 à 1 h 30
#2
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,302
Mentions "j'aime": 21,047
Quoting: NickC1988
Nobody is taking Mrazek at this point. That contract was awful, should've traded a 2nd for Nedeljkovic instead.


Lul there is always a team who would take him. His one simple issue cant stay healthy but compared to the 5-6 mill deals being thrown around his could be a steal if he just gets some good games in as so far he has only played 2

As once healthy we know what he can do.
6 déc. 2021 à 5 h 33
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
Sabres fan here

The trades with us are reasonable, but a couple things:

Do we “need” a goalie?
Depends on direction is management trying to take the team with the rest of this season

Are we trying to make a run at a playoff spot?
-this isn’t reasonable imo, but if management thinks we can make a run at it- then YES, we absolutely need goaltending help

IF
we do actually decide we want a goalie….
Do we even like Mrazek?
Or is there another potential target, like Holtby from Dallas for example, who would be more appealing?

OR

***and this is the side of the fence i land on***
Does management think that we just aren’t ready yet?
In which case,
wasting assets that would hurt our potential draft position would just prove to be a feudal effort that hurt more than it helps

I just don’t think we have the depth right now,
and even adding a “GOOD” goalie wouldn’t be enough to give us the boost we need

What does management think?
TBD


Now with Ritchie….
I’ve never really been a fan. Even going back to his draft year,
I thought the Ducks were “reaching” and regret the pick

Could he be a useful “bottom6” player?
MAYBE
And the Sabres would seem like the type of team to take this type of chance- especially if you’re sending us a decent pick to take him
I could see that happen- it would make some sense

However,
we have a handful of good young talent at the forward position who are ready to make the leap
So the question may not be whether or not it makes sense to give Ritchie a shot here….
It’s probably more like,
“Do we think Ritchie has enough potential, to give him a shot right now over one of our talented kids who seem ready?”

*another thing to consider
Management might not WANT to bring any of our talented kids up this season, and might just wanna let them continue to develop & do some WINNING in the AHL- as opposed to coming up here & getting their butts kicked nightly

*this is the side of the fence i land on
I think we should leave the kids in the AHL, and take chances on guys like Ritchie (even though i don’t particularly like him),
and other similar young players

We have some guys playing nightly right now who clearly have no future here, so we might as well make some deals like the Ritchie trade…. ESPECIALLY if he’s coming with a decent pick

Again, i can’t profess to know Management’s thought process here…. But I’d do the deal


Sorry for the long response
It’s just not a cut & dry situation for us



Also…. GO BILLS !!!
OldNYIfan et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
6 déc. 2021 à 5 h 36
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,567
Mentions "j'aime": 11,949
Gunna cost a 1st plus
6 déc. 2021 à 8 h 28
#5
TOR V5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,382
Mentions "j'aime": 1,906
Quoting: Buffalove
Sabres fan here

The trades with us are reasonable, but a couple things:

Do we “need” a goalie?
Depends on direction is management trying to take the team with the rest of this season

Are we trying to make a run at a playoff spot?
-this isn’t reasonable imo, but if management thinks we can make a run at it- then YES, we absolutely need goaltending help

IF
we do actually decide we want a goalie….
Do we even like Mrazek?
Or is there another potential target, like Holtby from Dallas for example, who would be more appealing?

OR

***and this is the side of the fence i land on***
Does management think that we just aren’t ready yet?
In which case,
wasting assets that would hurt our potential draft position would just prove to be a feudal effort that hurt more than it helps

I just don’t think we have the depth right now,
and even adding a “GOOD” goalie wouldn’t be enough to give us the boost we need

What does management think?
TBD


Now with Ritchie….
I’ve never really been a fan. Even going back to his draft year,
I thought the Ducks were “reaching” and regret the pick

Could he be a useful “bottom6” player?
MAYBE
And the Sabres would seem like the type of team to take this type of chance- especially if you’re sending us a decent pick to take him
I could see that happen- it would make some sense

However,
we have a handful of good young talent at the forward position who are ready to make the leap
So the question may not be whether or not it makes sense to give Ritchie a shot here….
It’s probably more like,
“Do we think Ritchie has enough potential, to give him a shot right now over one of our talented kids who seem ready?”

*another thing to consider
Management might not WANT to bring any of our talented kids up this season, and might just wanna let them continue to develop & do some WINNING in the AHL- as opposed to coming up here & getting their butts kicked nightly

*this is the side of the fence i land on
I think we should leave the kids in the AHL, and take chances on guys like Ritchie (even though i don’t particularly like him),
and other similar young players

We have some guys playing nightly right now who clearly have no future here, so we might as well make some deals like the Ritchie trade…. ESPECIALLY if he’s coming with a decent pick

Again, i can’t profess to know Management’s thought process here…. But I’d do the deal


Sorry for the long response
It’s just not a cut & dry situation for us



Also…. GO BILLS !!!


I believe there was a report that Buffalo is looking for a goalie, and i believe Jeff Marek linked Khudobin to Buffalo
Voir tout