PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
sabertooth12
Membre depuis
22 mars 2019
Équipe favorite
Sabres de Buffalo
Messages dans les forums
332
Messages par jour
0.2
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 nov. 2020 à 14 h 26
Sujet:
Need a LD
too much for Bean, honestly Mittestadt + 3rd should be enough for Bean
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 juill. 2020 à 16 h 15
Sujet:
Random trade idea is this close
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabertooth12</b></div><div>Ditto to the question I asked Stan_Bowman, what do you think?</div></div>
Depends on the forward situation for CHI but if it was just a trade about exchanging similiar cap hits I'd do it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 juill. 2020 à 14 h 46
Sujet:
Smartest Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>This move would be dependent on what there long-term plans for Dumba and Brodin are and IF they believe Mittelstadt can stick at center.</div></div>
That's more positive than I thought it would be -- I had this as a non-starter, but <a href="/users/sabertooth12" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@sabertooth12</a> gets a vote of confidence.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 juill. 2020 à 13 h 53
Sujet:
Smartest Moves
I love Larsson on the 3rd line. I really hope both sides work something out, although I have my doubts that’s he doesn’t want to come back.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juill. 2020 à 22 h 46
Sujet:
Domi for 8th Overall
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>I think the people that disagree have common sense and understand that 50-55 point center doesn’t get you a 8th overall pick. what part of this speeds up the rebuild. Does domi make this team better than Toronto Boston or Tampa? How about Pittsburgh Washington philly CBJ islanders or Rangers? Imo no. So if Eichel wants out get a massive return and do an actual rebuild like the rangers did. Quick and intelligently. Getting slightly better but still not being a playoff team seems stupid when giving up a major asset</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>I think the people that disagree have common sense and understand that 50-55 point center doesn’t get you a 8th overall pick. what part of this speeds up the rebuild. Does domi make this team better than Toronto Boston or Tampa? How about Pittsburgh Washington philly CBJ islanders or Rangers? Imo no. So if Eichel wants out get a massive return and do an actual rebuild like the rangers did. Quick and intelligently. Getting slightly better but still not being a playoff team seems stupid when giving up a major asset</div></div>
And I think the people who agree that Domi is worth 8th OVA and are the ones that have a better understanding of hockey in general! They know that a proven NHL top 6 talent is worth more than the hope that an 8th OVA prospect will be an impact player. Being a high draft pick garuntees nothing take Puljujarvi for example picked what was it 3rd OVA really has not done much! Or how about Galchenyuk again a 3rd OVA pick and is on his what 5th team since being drafted! Or how about any of Buffalos own 4 8th OVA selections are any of them better than Domi? Nope! Prospects are great when they work out but of the 200+ drafted a year only something like 20% ever make the NHL and maybe 10% are impact players.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juill. 2020 à 22 h 20
Sujet:
Domi for 8th Overall
I was reading through this thread as well as my own and SABERTOOTH12's and noticed a couple of common patterns. 1. Most Buffalo fans are either all for or on the fence about trading Domi for the 8th OVA pick which suggests to me that the value is close. 2. Most of the ones opposed to it are other Atlantic Division teams fans which suggests 2 things they know the value is there and are worried that both Montreal and Buffalo will get stronger from such a trade over the next few years and the division will become a tighter race where their teams may not make the playoffs. 3. Most of the fans not in the Atlantic suggest Domi's value is worth 8th OVA or at least Domi would be more valuable to the Sabres than the 8th OVA pick to both keeping Eichel in town and accelerating the retool.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juill. 2020 à 22 h 11
Sujet:
Domi for 8th Overall
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>Yeah Domi doesn’t push them over the edge and if Eichel wants out adding Domi doesn’t fix that... only thing more frustrating than not making playoffs is getting embarrassed in the 1st round. Does Domi make this team better than Boston toronto or Tampa ? It’s not better than a Metronwild card like CJB Pittsburgh PhILLY or the islanders. What part makes this a playoffs team? Maybe 2 years from now is the right move.</div></div>
Two years from now? They haven't made the playoffs in NINE seasons! I really don't see this fan base or more importantly Eichel having the patience to wait around hoping the 8th overall pick turns out to be a savior.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juill. 2020 à 18 h 32
Sujet:
Domi for 8th Overall
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Campabee</b></div><div>We had this argument last night as well, <a href="/users/mhockey91" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@mhockey91</a> stated NO knowledgeable Sabres fan he has spoken with would trade Domi for 8th OVA and then the comments went on to call me everything from a moron to a clown for suggesting he was so good luck with this thread</div></div>
But I'm NOT trading Domi for the 8th overall pick -- I'm trading the 8th overall pick for Domi plus the 39th overall pick.
Moreover, I hold <a href="/users/sabertooth12" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@sabertooth12</a> in pretty high esteem as a "knowledgeable Buffalo fan," and he gets the credit if any is due for the goodness of this idea; as the saying goes, I get the criticism if it's a bad one.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juill. 2020 à 18 h 26
Sujet:
Domi for 8th Overall
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sabres923</b></div><div>They need to go the Vancouver route. This draft class is stacked with forwards, Domi isn’t worth the 8th overall pick. Maybe a 2021 first.</div></div>
I disagree. Domi now is better than whoever the Sabres are likely to get and put on the ice in one or two years (if ever), especially since he can by under team control for almost as long as the 8th overall pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juill. 2020 à 18 h 19
Sujet:
Domi for 8th Overall
I think MTL should take that if offered. Domi is on the lower end of what you want out of an 8th overall pick
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 14 h 11
Sujet:
Domi for 8
Well done!
Personally I think some of the signings are a bit high - losing teams shouldn't have to give out big money long term deals to underperforming RFA's - but its always better to err on the safe side.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 13 h 23
Sujet:
Domi for 8
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabertooth12</b></div><div>See: Max Domi, Dylan Cozens haha</div></div>
I was approaching that comment as the Sabres in general not on this particular AGM team
Lol.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 13 h 12
Sujet:
Domi for 8
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabertooth12</b></div><div>True, Larsson will likely cost less, but at least that gives us less of a cap hit in this model and doesn't effect the overall structure of the team. My whole point is pretty much resign him no matter what bc his game is exactly what this team needs</div></div>
I would like to resign him. But not no matter what. He can help this team, but what this team needs is more goals. They have been deficient in that area for years. If the had average overall or better goaltending this year they would have been among the better teams in the league in GA
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 13 h 3
Sujet:
Domi for 8
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabertooth12</b></div><div>It also provides some valuable insurance with Danault, Tatar, Gallagher, and Petry all being UFA's next summer. You guys will need a glut of high-end young players to replace some of them</div></div>
I doubt we lose more than one of those players to free agency, but we’ll definitely have a bunch of prospects able to steal a roster spot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 13 h 0
Sujet:
Domi for 8
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabertooth12</b></div><div>He's a UFA and a top 10 defensive forward in the league. The Sabres need him back and I think there will be a strong market for him, hence the price</div></div>
He is excellent defensively but contracts are typically structured around counting stats and Larsson has yet to eclipse 20 points in a season and is 27. He is a excellent 4th line center that can play on your third line in a pinch. If we have to commit those kinds of dollars O would want someone who might not be as good defensively but can bring me 25 to 30 points maybe 35 in a great year. Carl Soderberg someone along those lines
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 12 h 56
Sujet:
Domi for 8
I don’t think it’s bad, but for me it all depends on who else is on the table when our choice. If there is Rossi or Raymond, I would not trade #8 and would find the center elsewhere.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 12 h 47
Sujet:
Domi for 8
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabertooth12</b></div><div>I think we could, I don't think he has a ton of leverage in negotiation since he was strapped to Eichel's hip and he's aready 25</div></div>
Him being 25 is one of the reasons why I think he won't sign that long of term at 4.75. We are buying 2 years of UFA with a 5 year contract.
I also estimated he would also get 4.75, but I think it will be similar to Reinhart, shorter term. If he goes with 5 years, I would wager his contract will be about a million more per season.
Overall I like the build though.
Oh sorry one more comment, I would bench okposo for Lazar haha.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 12 h 47
Sujet:
Domi for 8
This is extremely well reasoned. It is the perfect refutation of the Hertl-for-the-eighth nonsense that was so popular last week. Personally, I think you'd have to add your 2020 fourth, but you've got the basic value right.
I think <a href="/users/dzmets" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@dzmets</a> is more likely to be right on Larsson than you are, and I agree with <a href="/users/SlevinKalevra" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@SlevinKalevra</a> that Ristolainen doesn't get you a first. But you've created a very strong roster with a good future here. Well done!!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 12 h 11
Sujet:
Domi for 8
I like this roster build. 3 million I think is too much for Larrson. I think 2-2.25 is a fair range for him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 12 h 3
Sujet:
Domi for 8
I like this trade for habs. Yes Domi has played well, but Montreal is a bubble team in the Atlantic every year with With Boston, Tampa, Toronto trio, with Florida having a bad year (i blame Bobrosky). Montreal will then have pick 8 & 9 (If miss playoffs and doesn't get lucky in lottery), and can get 2 quality young players, let them develop for a year, then bring up all the kids in 2021-22 season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 12 h 15
Sujet:
Domi for 8
Domi's career to this date is basically what an 8th overall pick should be
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 12 h 14
Sujet:
Domi for 8
Good job
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 juill. 2020 à 15 h 50
Sujet:
STOP TRADING 8OA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabertooth12</b></div><div>The Sabres are just so bad at drafting that they would manage to find the only bust in the top 10 of this class. This fan base (and frankly Eichel) are sick of waiting for these "star" players to develop. From a fan that has suffered through Girgensens, Grigorenko, Ristolainen, Reinhart not coming even close to living up to a #2 pick (albeit solid), Nylander, Mittelstadt... they need a new approach and I completely disagree with guys like Holtz, Raymond, Perfetti being NHL ready. This past season, two of them were barely SHL ready. They need to surround Cozens and Mitts with established players for them to reach their ceiling</div></div>
Drafting at 8 will make sure Eichel asks out in a year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 juill. 2020 à 15 h 25
Sujet:
STOP TRADING 8OA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shibbal18</b></div><div>I <strong>HATE</strong> Harrington, but a broke clock is right 2x a day</div></div>
Sabres can't wait on an 18 year old to help Eichel.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 juill. 2020 à 14 h 34
Sujet:
STOP TRADING 8OA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>They'd be foolish to not consider it, IMO. You are WAY overvaluing the draft pick and WAY overestimating the Sabres ability to get that pick right.
Between 2001 and 2015 there were 39 forwards taken with picks <strong>4-7</strong>. If we rearrange them by P/GP performance we can see the odds of getting a difference-maker:
Superstar (1.00+ P/GP): 0/39 = 0%
Elite (0.75 - 0.99): 8/39 = 20.5%
Top-6 (0.50 - 0.74): 17/39 = 43.6%
Bottom-6 (< 0.50): 14/39 = 35.9%
I did that research when Buffalo was slotted to get the 7th pick, but since they're now picking 8th lets repeat the procedure but with picks 8-10. Forwards only, from 2001 to 2015 inclusive:
Superstar (1.00+ P/GP): 0/27 = 0%
Elite (0.75 - 0.99): 2/27 = 7.4%
Top-6 (0.50 - 0.74): 11/27 = 40.7%
Bottom-6 (< 0.50): 14/27 = 51.9%
High picks are great, but (cap aside) if you have a chance to trade your #8 pick for an established player in his early 20's who scores 0.67 P/GP you shouldn't dismiss that as "foolish". Only 2 of the players in the Top-6 range matched or exceeded 0.67 P/GP, meaning that you typically have a 14.8% chance of getting a player equal to or better (offensively) than Domi with that pick. AGAIN, it depends on who is available there, but to dismiss the notion of trading the pick so hastily is foolish.</div></div>
<a href="/users/Shibbal18" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Shibbal18</a> <a href="/users/SalamiCheese" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@SalamiCheese</a> <a href="/users/sabertooth12" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@sabertooth12</a> <a href="/users/MartianKiwi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@MartianKiwi</a>
You guys might like the odds I posted above.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com