PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
johnston3504
Membre depuis
6 mai 2019
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Deuxième équipe favorite
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Messages dans les forums
439
Messages par jour
0.2
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 févr. 2020 à 9 h 8
Sujet:
Probably should of happened by now
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SammyT_51</b></div><div>You want to milk the value as much as possible right? I think if they have a deal they like they would do it. Or maybe they are still talking trade.</div></div>
yeah, then there is reality. Where the only teams looking to bring in a rental are playoff teams. And if a playoff team wasted 4.5 mil in cap space on Ceci the fan bases would be just as PO as the TOR fan base would be if TOR wasted 4.5 mil in cap space bringing in Ceci for their cup run right?
They don't have a trade partner. He's a cap dump. No one is looking to go after Ceci and that thought is just pure BS.
TOR is actively looking for a place to dump him is the more likely scenario. If they can find a place or not is a different story. They have to make it worth it.
Much like no one is actively looking to bring in Jack Johnson from the penguins. That's just pure BS. If they are to move him it would be in the off season to a team who needs a body. Much like they did Gudbranson and Maatta earlier this season. TOR is lucky in that Ceci's contract ends. So they don't have to worry about it after this season. But no team is actively looking to bring him in. No one.
Forum:
NHL Signings
28 janv. 2020 à 10 h 42
Sujet:
Pittsburgh Penguins signed Marcus Pettersson (5 Years / $4,025,175 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Random2152</b></div><div>So is Justin holl. He signed for 2 mil less. It's an overpayment</div></div>
This is also Holl's first full season, and Pettersson is having a 2nd straight solid season. Pettersson is also playing 20 min a night, compared to Holl at 17 min. Pettersson is also a lot younger. Pettersson also signed for more years. Im not sure where the comparison is
Forum:
NHL Signings
29 janv. 2020 à 19 h 30
Sujet:
Edmonton Oilers signed Zack Kassian (4 Years / $3,200,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Random2152</b></div><div>Wow, No NTC. Honestly shocked. For Holland this isn't too bad... Still a bad contract but still.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Kassian contract breakdown:<br><br>Year 1: $2.5M salary, $1M signing bonus.<br>Year 2: $2.5M salary, $1M signing bonus.<br>Year 3: $3.5M salary.<br>Year 4: $2.3M salary.<br><br>The contract does not include any type of no-trade protection.</p>— Bob McKenzie (@TSNBobMcKenzie) <a href="https://twitter.com/TSNBobMcKenzie/status/1222676789987889152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 30, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</div></div>
It doesn't need a NTC. The NTC is implied.
Who would want that contract?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 janv. 2020 à 14 h 20
Sujet:
Toronto trade but its not Georgie
I am disinterested in trading for a goalie at this point. I am also disinterested in giving up Jost (top 10 pick who's development may be slow, but is coming along), a 1st AND 2nd rounder for Kreider. He would be a great addition to the Avs, but the Avs could also keep all of those pieces and let it ride. Even if that group only makes it to the 2nd round again, the cup window juuuuuust opened up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 janv. 2020 à 10 h 10
Sujet:
2020-2021
That right side is realllyyy weak, worse than 2019-2020 IMO & Mike smith might be wasted money I dont think hes a great goaltender even this year he has great numbers but he has a Top defensive team in front of him IIRC
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 janv. 2020 à 10 h 17
Sujet:
What would it take
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>johnston3504</b></div><div>Timashov, Ceci, Liljegren, Johnsson , and a second?</div></div>
Yeah not bad. While I'm thinking about it Minnesota could ask for Kerfoot instead or Mango or Kappy, they desperately young players who can play center, since Koivu is 36 and Staal is 35.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 janv. 2020 à 9 h 51
Sujet:
defense upgrades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>johnston3504</b></div><div>maybe he is thinking option 1 and 2 not both?</div></div>
you would hope but then wouldnt he just trade the same player in both scenarios? seems like he turned kapanen who i personally like and wished the bruins had offersheeted into a year of a goalie and a bust so far. Then turns mango a decent player into a backup that isnt playing nhl hockey right now, a defenseman that isnt really anything special and a 3rd thats going to end up late round. feel like they lose that trade by a mile, i can see the reasoning on the georgiev trade but you move out 2 decent players and replace it with hamonic, georgiev, andersson, desmith, and ruhwedel. ew.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 janv. 2020 à 8 h 23
Sujet:
do something
That's a bad trade. Not sure Toronto wants to pay the price a guy like Jones would take (it isn't a bunch of spare parts that's for sure). Savard is a more realistic target although he's... not awesome.
What is the fascination with Josh Anderson? He's a terrible fit on this Toronto team. I realize everyone wants to add "sandpaper" and "grit" because Brian Burke says so, but on a heavy possession team that relies on skill why would we want him instead of Kapanen or Johnsson?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. 2020 à 12 h 41
Sujet:
Shore Up the D
Duck fans think they are going to get Nylander for Manson. Unless you offer up Liljegren, a first and Johnsson they won't say its fair. Also Manson really isn't all that good. He had a terrific season 2 years ago and has just been average since.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. 2020 à 12 h 58
Sujet:
Shore Up the D
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Salzy</b></div><div>No ducks fan with half a brain thinks that at all. We can't afford to move Manson for less than an overpay, which is admitting we are getting more than he's worth.
We don't have the depth to move him for a mid six winger which we dont need, a B prospect at best and Ceci</div></div>
You see I just understand that. If my team clearly isn't good enough to contend, I'd want them to sell everything that wasn't bolted to the floor and do a proper rebuild. This whole, he means something to our team that isn't good enough doesn't make sense. He means the same as Getzlaf, he's an asset that can be moved for a younger asset and other futures that can bring in players to build around. Is Manson going to help you be a contender anytime soon? No, he isn't good enough to make much of an impact, he's a great depth piece but only if you have the stars for him to support which you just don't have anymore. Go for a rebuild, sell everything and be the better for it. Otherwise you are going to be saying in a couple of years when you still aren't a contender that you should have traded him when he had value. Now he's 31 and not worth much.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. 2020 à 13 h 1
Sujet:
Shore Up the D
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>At this point, the issue isn't "How good is Josh Manson?", it's "Does this trade help the Ducks long term, or hurt them?". Getting a mid-6 (Johnsson), Bracco, Ceci and potentially a 3rd doesn't help the Ducks. All it does is take away ice-time from the young guys that they're trying to develop in a lost season.
I get that you guys hate Ceci, but if you're going to argue about how Manson is mediocre, then keep Ceci! There! There's your cap space for next year. Problem solved.</div></div>
The argument is Manson is an upgrade over Ceci. And Johnsson is a 24 year old player whos proven he can contribute in the top 6. Maybe Anahiem flips him too, and Ceci and then keeps Bracco to see what he can do with in the NHL. Anahiem doesn't have any capable RHD beyond Manson. That is the problem, not trading or keeping Manson. They aren't good enough, they don't have enough prospects and keeping old guys so they can hope they somehow bounce back is just pointless. Rebuild, sell everything and come back stronger. Or be like LA.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 déc. 2019 à 9 h 38
Sujet:
EXTEND DERMOTT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>johnston3504</b></div><div>well i went off of what comparable dman got in earlier years, ryan ellis was at .31 ppg when he signed and it was over 200 games dermott only will have 170 if hes healthy and .28 ppg if he stays at the same pace, ellis got 3.62% of the cap when he signed which works out to about 2.95 mill but with a lower ppg and less of a span to see if that averages out higher or lower i bumped it down, if you were going to do a oscar klefbom type deal at around 4.6 mill which is 5.75% of the cap it would be more like 7 years.</div></div>
Maybe a more recent comparable would be Sam Girard of the Avs who extended earlier....new contract is 2020/21 is 5m X 7. Dermot might not be quite be in that level, but as you suggest 4.6 X7 might get it done.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 déc. 2019 à 9 h 4
Sujet:
Fixing Cap for next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>johnston3504</b></div><div>ceci gets 2 tops</div></div>
and it won't be from Toronto
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 déc. 2019 à 10 h 55
Sujet:
Offers for Kapanen or johnsson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>johnston3504</b></div><div>He said top 4 not number 1 dman a top 4 could be a 3 or 4 they would get that marner would get a top 2 d man.</div></div>
There are #1 defenceman, and then there are guys who look great next to top defenceman. Marner would get you a #1 defenceman or at least a future #1 defenceman. This whole ideal that guys like Manson who play on a top pair are somehow worth top end talent is insane.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 déc. 2019 à 14 h 6
Sujet:
Next season with a conservative salary increase
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>You really think Muzzin is going to accept the Gardiner who settled contract</div></div>
Let muzzin walk I say. The only contract that would possibly work for the leafs is a 4 year deal and muzzin won’t want it.
Leafs are better off with Holl than polak. I think the best case scenario for next season is
Rielly-ufa
Dermott-Holl
Sandin-liljegren.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
25 nov. 2019 à 23 h 24
Sujet:
Coucou11
Not sure which was a bigger waste of time. You making this or me reading it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 nov. 2019 à 10 h 39
Sujet:
Here ya go TOR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>joshelkin</b></div><div>I saw your post trading scraps for Werenski lol</div></div>
That doesn't make your proposal any better though. This is a common thing on here. A fan will see a fan of another team make a trade proposal that is just silly and one sided, that happens all the time and every fan base has an element of that. What a smart person does is ignore those ones. What happens more often is you see something like this in response. Just because someone makes a bad trade, you posting another one almost as bad doesn't make yours look better. Its still a terrible proposal and I am sure you know that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 nov. 2019 à 9 h 57
Sujet:
Here ya go TOR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>johnston3504</b></div><div>hahaahhahaha this is too funny you want a 40+ pt defense , i know currently he is not playing very well but im sure he will com around and a forward who scored 20 goals last season 44 pts and is currently on pace for that again this season for 2 guys who together totaled 24 pts last season?? no thanks i would rather trade those 2 for 1 decent player than 2 below average ones.</div></div>
I saw your post trading scraps for Werenski lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 nov. 2019 à 6 h 36
Sujet:
Possible deals
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>On the best defense the league has seen since prime Red Wings, hes a top 4 D on most other teams quite easily. Very underrated</div></div>
I know he is underrated but he is not worth Kapanen. Maybe a 3rd and some kind of prospect sure.. but not much more to be honest with ya. Id like to see him on the Leafs with Rielly (he would be good defensive presence), but not for much more money because then he is just another #4/#5..
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 nov. 2019 à 5 h 54
Sujet:
Possible deals
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Canes won't do that, the deal would be around Kapanen with resign conditions for TVR</div></div>
TVR is 3rd pairing Dman averaging circa 15 minutes a night. Same as Justin Holl.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 nov. 2019 à 5 h 25
Sujet:
This is resonable
Underselling kapanen in my opinion. Just because he is replaceable doesn't mean we should ship him out for less than he is worth.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 oct. 2019 à 9 h 35
Sujet:
Blockbuster with Toronto
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>HARD PASS from Chicago.
Agreed, But Kasperi is legit. So I get where he's coming from. Still don't want Slick Willie though.</div></div>
Well you completely misinterpreted my statement. Nylander is a beast. If he ever was given legit top PP time with Matthews and Tavares he'd be well over a point a game player. He's been one of the best players on the ice all season. Kapanen is a good player but I don't think he's even close to as valuable as Nylander. So hard pass from Chicago? They don't give up anything of major value and get the two best players in the trade. Can Chicago fans just put this to bed already? The Leafs have no interest in the one hit wonder Gustafson, who would be 3rd pair in TO, and they can't afford and don't want Saad either. He's a fine player but he's overpriced and there is too many better players in TO that would force him down to the 3rd line which makes his contract even worse. And before you say anything else. No moving one of Kapanen or Nylander for Saad isn't an addition by subtraction or whatever other BS Line you want to use to justify the Leafs downgrading their talent in a huge way for a pretty good "defensive" depth player.
Just no to all of this. Chicago has almost nothing TO would be interested in apart from some of your RHD D prospects or Debrincat (Who I would be shocked if you wanted to move).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 oct. 2019 à 10 h 0
Sujet:
Blockbuster with Toronto
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>Nothing of major value... Jeeze. Gus has as many points and Nylander's...career best…as a defenseman...that costs $1.2M. Nylander's on a BLISTERING pace for 52 points this year. He's a playmaker that doesn't make enough plays. It's like calling Bob's contact good to date. He's a goalie that's having a hard time stopping the puck from going into the net. I don't care how good his glove side is...if his 5 hole is wide open. I feel like I'm banging my head against the wall throwing out facts and stats and you're just saying forget all that! Who needs facts?! Nylander's a Beast because I say so! Let's blame literally everyone else. Tavares is hurt, Babcock, blah blah blah. You get what you earn. He hasn't earned it and here we are year freaking FIVE...still no sign of living up to that $7M contract. Then the idea of trading him to a team with LESS talent...Surely that'll help him out!</div></div>
If Gus is so good why don't you keep him? If Saad is so good, why not keep him? Especially if Nylander is so bad. Gus scored a tonne of PP points off the back of Kane's skill last year and has nothing else to offer. He's an NHL player sure but where would he fit in TO? Rielly and Muzzin are superior players. As is Barrie. And since Gus is a lefty, he'd be on the 3rd pair. He won't get points on the PP and would get caved in defensively like he does for Chicago on a nightly basis. No thanks.
Saad? If he was so awesome why does literally every Chicago fan try and trade him daily?
I don't ever consider trading Nylander because he's a great player and I doubt the Leafs could get fair value for him. Kapanen I'd trade cause I think he's overrated but I wouldn't want any of the players Chicago has to offer. Anything worthwhile in Chicago is either too old, or too expensive.
Say whatever you want about how much I overrate Leaf players, it doesn't matter. I am not wanting to trade them and neither does Dubas. The one fact you just can't spin in any logical way is this. If you truly think these players are so much better than the players who are trading them for, you'd never make the trade. So obviously Chicago fans don't think much of Gus and hope they can maximize his value based of his one good offensive season (He was terrible defensively like the rest of the team, 3rd most goals allowed in the league last year) and they don't think much of Saad either because they are always trading him. What does that say about these players?
Now I am sure the next argument point is, we need to move them to give young players a chance to shine. That essentially means these guys aren't long term pieces for your rebuilding team, which means one of 2 things, their salary is going to be a long term problem (Both are likely in that case) or currently they aren't better then younger options. In either case, why would a team that is leaving their rebuild want players that aren't good enough to be long term pieces on an inferior team?
Just to clear it up, for every reason you want to move these players, those exact reasons are doubled for why TO has no interest in these players. Saad is not an improvement over either Nylander or Kapanen. And Gus is just a 3rd pair guy in TO because as I have mentioned both Muzzin and Rielly are much better players. So from a team need perspective, TO would have zero interest in any trade along these lines. On top of all that, what team in this day and age moves out two 23 year old high value offensive players for 2 older players that don't improve the team? I'll answer that one for you as well. Maybe Chiarelli but thats about it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 oct. 2019 à 14 h 18
Sujet:
Blockbuster with Toronto
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>There are 2 reasons in combination as to why everyone (including myself) is trading Gus on here. A.) The hawks are not cups contenders. That's NOT fun for me to type. It's also being a realist. That's very important because if they were...You wouldn't see posts shedding assets. You'd see posts acquiring assets. and B.) The Hawks can't afford to resign him next year. Also very important. Why let him walk away for nothing if you can get SERIOUS assets in return...which you can. Literally 30 other teams can afford a $600k cap hit if the hawks eat half of it. Playoff Contenders will be inquiring about his services...as they already were last year.
Trading Gus literally has nothing to do with his talent. I would LOVE to keep him, but we can't afford him and we also have Boqvist/Mitchell/Beaudin waiting in the wings. The Hawks can utilize that cap space more effectively in other places next year through a #1 goalie and a #2 Center. With that said...why playoff teams WANT the rental (any rental) is because it doesn't affect their cap management next year. Guys like Dubas, McPhee, JR, etc... would at least inquire is because (Let's use Vegas as an example) they could give up some draft capital and just about literally ANY other roster player and stay under the cap. They also won't have to include ANY other pieces that might affect their playoff run in a negative mannner.
FOR EXAMPLE....Imagine for a second if TOR wasn't in the picture. You bet your bottom dollar that if for some ungodly reason TOR isn't in the hunt...Dubas is looking to trade Muzzin and Barrie for future assets. BUT the difference is (sticking with the Vegas example) Cap hit needs to go back. A guy like Eakin who is vital for a playoff run could stay with Vegas if they traded for Gus Vs Barrie. Thousands of examples as to why cap management is important.
I'm not saying TOR wants either Gus or Saad. TOR already has Barrie. He's a poor man's Gus anyway. Why get two players that are mainly focused on offense. But don't pretend that CHI wants Big Willie either. $7M is clearly too much and we're in no way shape or form trying to help TOR with the cap problems. $3.2M for Kasperi...I'm listening as a Hawks fan.</div></div>
A poor man's gus. Lol.
Barrie has a much longer track record of being a top tier offensive defenceman. Not 1 season.
But as for the rest of our statement, I totally get why you want to move them. However, you won't be moving them to a team for better young players in return. Kapanen is as good as Saad and is younger and has a lot more upside that is still untapped. Toronto has no intention of moving Nylander, Babs is far more likely to get canned before Nylander is traded. He's a terrific player and is going to have a great year, of this I have no doubt. His 7 million dollar contract (6.9) isn't at all a problem for the team. After seeing what Marner got, I think Nylander is a steal. But I am also very high on Nylander so I'll admit I have a bias there. No matter how you spin it though, moving 2 younger and highly skilled players for older guys that have less talent and are in need of contracts sooner than the guys they are moving out is an entirely stupid idea.
Why on earth would the Leafs move a guy who would be a top 6 forward on most teams for an expiring contract? Gus isn't as good as Muzzin, and he's an expiring contract. Why would Dubas pay more than he did for Muzzin? He simply wouldn't. So if you guys are moving Gus, its going to be for at best a package similar to Muzzin and since, Gus has exactly 1 good season at the age of 27, I highly doubt you are going to get that much in return. At best, Gus will get you a B prospect and a 1st rounder. More likely, you'll get just a late 1st or maybe a lesser prospect and a 2nd. Because as you mentioned, this guy is going to want to get paid and most contenders won't be able to extend him so it'll be a straight up rental.
I don't want to come across that either Saad or Gus have zero value, that is 100% not the case. I am just saying that from a Leafs perspective Kap at 3.2 is far more attractive than a rental depth defenceman who would be at best the #3 LHD on the team. And Saad vs Nylander isn't even a conversation. Nylander is better, and he's 23 and still is going to get even better. So what are we talking about? If you ask me, we are talking about a dream scenario for Chicago fans and thats it. The reality is, this whole scenario and debate makes no sense for TO.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 oct. 2019 à 16 h 47
Sujet:
Get That D
I don't know, this might be a bit biased, but I think the leafs should consider sacking Babcock before they make any trades. The leafs have had the same issues with their defensive game for the last three years, and there's been a ton of turnover with the d core over those 3 years.
Could some new d personnel improve the sitch? Sure, why not. But I kinda have the feeling that the leafs could have a d corps made up of top pairing d from other teams and our d game would still suck. As much as our d problems could be improved with new dmen, I'd like to see if we could make improvements with the d that we have before we start shipping out roster players. That very likely requires firing Babcock. I'd rather see that before trading Kapanen.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com