SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

cac71

Membre depuis
13 sept. 2020
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
61
Messages par jour
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GM1 juill. 2021 à 16 h 52
Forum: Armchair-GM13 oct. 2020 à 14 h 56
Sujet: Saving the offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tkecanuck341</b></div><div>If the Kings are taking on bad contracts, they're going to go big and get a 1st in return. If you'd like to send over Eriksson and a 1st, the Kings will happily listen.

If the Kings were to accept a lesser pick and a prospect for Roussel, you'll have to do better on the prospect. Kings will want a forward. Hoglander perhaps.</div></div>

There is no way in hell a first round pick or a top prospect would have to be attached to Roussel. His contract isnt great, but there is no way it is not moveable. Especially if we are taking back pretty much half the salary with this wagner trade idea. I think the canucks obviously need to add a prospect and a pick to get rid of Roussel, but I disagree that it would have to be a first rounder or top prospect.
Forum: Armchair-GM13 sept. 2020 à 16 h 28
Sujet: Upgraded Team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kotkaniemi15</b></div><div>Actual money paid isn’t something the habs will make moves to change. Geoff Moulson doesn’t have any financial troubles, and putting the team in a position to win is obviously more important than saving a bit of money.

And while Roussel is french, he’s from France, and the only connection he has to Quebec is that he played 4 seasons in Chicoutimi. And even if he were from Quebec, that’s no reason to trade for a player.</div></div>

I dont disagree with you at all. I figured the Eriksson for Alzner deal would actually help the habs as Eriksson is at least an NHL player still, just at a higher cap hit. And I wasnt insinuating that Moulson was in financial trouble but during covid times, I figured owners might want to shed some cash owed for this season while still upgrading the team albeit slightly. As for Roussel just because he is French is not a reason to trade for him, that is correct. For the Canucks lineup I just figured I would trade him to MTL and throw in a prospect. You could replace MTL with any team and the deal would stand for Roussel.
Forum: Armchair-GM13 sept. 2020 à 16 h 8
Sujet: Upgraded Team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMs</b></div><div>MTL isn’t interested in Roussel at all
We’ll need all the capspace necessary in 2021
Alzner vs Eriksson doesn’t make senses for us either, Alzner buried in the minor cost ~3.6M, Eriksson 6M ... Again, we need capspace for 2021</div></div>

My point with the Eriksson and Alzner deal is that Erikssons actual cash payment is lower even though his cap hit is higher. I understand your reasoning though, cap space is such a valuable asset on its own. As for Roussel I wasn't thinking MTL had a great amount of interest in him tbh I only traded him to MTL because he is French. That's the only connection there. You could replace MTL with any team with a decent amount of cap space and the deal would still stand. It wasn't about MTL having interest, it was more just about moving him and I only chose MTL because of the French connection. Thanks for your input