SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

TOR

Membre depuis
27 mai 2024
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Deuxième équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Messages dans les forums
266
Messages par jour
7.8
Forum: Armchair-GM20 juin à 10 h 10
Forum: Armchair-GM19 juin à 10 h 7
Sujet: Frenzy
Forum: Armchair-GM18 juin à 18 h 41
Forum: Armchair-GM18 juin à 18 h 37
Forum: Armchair-GM18 juin à 18 h 31
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>And Calgary and Florida were both legitimate playoff contenders when that trade was made. And Tkachuk wasn't on an expiring contract. He was signed already to a brand new 8 year extension. So your "comparison" really isn't a good one. If Brad can get Mitch to sign an 8 year extension for 10 or 11 million, then maybe the Hawks have some interest. But the Leafs still don't get that Chicago '25 1st.</div></div>


What does both of them being legit contenders have to do with anything? Marner makes Chicago a FAR better team than they are now. Who is bedard wingers? They’re garbage. Ever heard of a sign and trade? Yes he was on an expiring contract numb nuts.

Why wouldn’t Marner sign an extension for even 9M per year? Do you understand income tax in Ontario? They get taxed to death over here! Marner makes 10.9M salary right now. I garuntee after it’s all said and done he makes about 8.5M per year. In Chicago he’d be able to keep a lot more of the money he makes.

If Marner signs for 9M for like 6 years Chicago better be giving up 2 firsts. You’re really not in tune with hockey are ya bud? When Calgary made that trade they got back essentially the same amount of points Tkachuk put up plus a solid second pairing defenseman and a depth player plus a conditional 4th round pick. In this trade all the leafs are getting back is a bottom 6 player. The only things that make this trade good for both sides is the draft picks.
Forum: Armchair-GM18 juin à 18 h 25
Forum: Armchair-GM18 juin à 17 h 36