SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

MTLaveragefan

I post sometimes
Membre depuis
21 juill. 2017
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Messages dans les forums
5757
Messages par jour
2.3
Forum: Armchair-GM17 avr. à 13 h 41
Sujet: If habs draft 5 OVR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonh514</b></div><div>I think with the amount of time spent getting ready for the draft, if your guy is on the board, you grab him.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GeneralLandro</b></div><div>I think this is the correct answer to the proposal but I almost like it’s a real interesting idea

Makes it even easier for Pat to trade up to draft MBN as well</div></div>

Sure - but sometimes - lets say you rate Levshunov a 90, and Parekh a 87/88 - then, getting a extra first and a yound D to end up with Parekh is not bad business.

Or, depending on the interviews - a player might score a 90 in skill - but he doesn't fit the team culture, then 87 may become more attractive (Imo, that what I think happened when the habs selected Reinbacher and they let Michkov slip to 7th)
Forum: Armchair-GM17 avr. à 13 h 36
Sujet: If habs draft 5 OVR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>It's an interesting proposal, and it really comes down to who we're looking at and where they're expected to go. Leshunov is top 2-3 on almost every trade board, bit I've seen some with Parekh going top 5 with Yamechuk outside the top 10, and some with Yamechuk going top 5, and Parekh outside the top 10.

Assuming we'd be happy with one of those three, it might be a gamble worth taking, but I might want a more usable player like Kovacevic instead of Barron, as I don't see Barron as a fit with the Ducks who have no need for his offensive abilities.

I'd also imagine this doesn't happen until after the lottery, in case that wasn't obvious.</div></div>

No problem, It can easily be Kovacevic.

and yes - after lottery where CHI and SJS stay in the top 2.
Forum: Armchair-GM17 avr. à 12 h 18
Sujet: Intersting Idea Trade next year might work on defense
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Blazingbat11</b></div><div>Value seems fine to me.....BUT since MTL is trading with the Leafs, there's that small internal part of me that wants to say no lol

Not to mention if Barron hits (which is still very much a possibility), it would be a very painful trade considering MTL just gets a late 1st and a meh prospect... If Barron were to hit with, let's say, a west coast team, not a big deal, congrats to Barron, MTL can move on. But with the Leafs.. habs would be reminded of it for the next decade.... no thanks to that.</div></div>

Also, In term of organisational depth - I doubt habs can afford to trade two RHD in one trade... we have LHD available.. but Mailloux and Reinbacher are likely 1 or 2 season out before making the Jump.
Forum: Armchair-GM17 avr. à 12 h 15
Sujet: few changes for another season of development
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaseyFlyman</b></div><div>I think the hangup is just the price. You've just got a pick swap (let's assume 4OA for 6OA) for Justin Barron, a guy who's at best our 5th RD. I'm all for trading back in that situation if we're viewing Catton, Iginla, Lindstrom, etc. as essentially equal, but I think that costs MTL at least their 2nd rounder this year, not just a depth defenseman.

If it's 4OA for 6OA and the WPG 1st, then yeah, that's a no brainer. No player inclusion necessary.</div></div>

You are right - the worst part, is that I was convinced that I had added WPG's first already LOL.

Yeah - it would most likely involve another pick.

I think the habs are likely to try to GARANTY Lindstrom/Demidov - and the price could even include CAL's 2025 first round pick.
Forum: Armchair-GM17 avr. à 11 h 31
Forum: Armchair-GM16 avr. à 21 h 21
Sujet: Tonight is the night we secure 5 OVR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>You guys always gives us a tough battle, Whoever wins tonight will deserve it.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ggha777</b></div><div>Wouldn’t it be nicer to play spoiler? There’s a lottery anyways so win or lose we don’t know what’s gonna happen with our draft position.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SharkTank</b></div><div>Wings players will be distracted watching the scoreboard (Caps/Flyers). 😬</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aedoran</b></div><div>I have to say Hudson looks really good!</div></div>

Damn check to everything so far with a few minutes left in the 3rd… now lets blow this lead!!
Forum: Armchair-GM14 avr. à 7 h 32
Sujet: UFA vets to complete top 6
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jay27</b></div><div>Idk, Stammer is great but I just don’t think it’s a great idea to go out and spend 10.5 a year for the next 3 years on a guy who’s 34 years old. Also I know +\~ is an archaic stat and all but has anyone else noticed that he is a ~21 on a team that has a +25 goal differential?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jay27</b></div><div>If MTL goes out and spends nearly 15mill on veteran UFAs this year then what happens next year when they need to sign Guhle and Slafkovsky to long term contracts?</div></div>

It a fair point, however if you look at the longterm outlook tab, you can see that the following year, the habs will have 30M$ in cap space to sign them.

I expect Slaf to get something like Caufield’s deal and that they will bridge Guhle.

As for the reason to pick up Stamkos - I think <a href="/users/F50marco" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@F50marco</a> sums it up quite well!

You want that vet presence in the locker room… and so far our vets seem to play on the bottom 6.

Let’s splurge on the old rockstar - we can afford it.