SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

GuyGuyGuy

Prime Primeau
Membre depuis
26 avr. 2023
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Messages dans les forums
5502
Messages par jour
14.6
Forum: Armchair-GM14 avr. à 14 h 19
Forum: Trade Machine Proposals12 avr. à 12 h 17
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>Mikheyev is a fourth liner. He is bad and a huge cap dump. Anderson is a fourth liner who is also a huge cap dump.

Suter can be easily replaced in FA.

So when Mikheyev has an ACL injury, his value is still good, but when Dach has one, that destroys his value? Coming back from an injury is a normal thing in this league</div></div>

It is a trade that makes no sense for either party.

A couple of counter points
First Mik is not a 4th line player, he played last year on the 1st line with a torn ACL and then the recovery time to full speed is 18 months so we wont see that this year.
Second Suter can't be easily replaced in FA for his cap hit, he is averaging the 5th most ice time for the Canucks forwards, you are not filling that for 1.6M.
Last on the counter points you're trying to compare Dach to Mik which a) I don't think are the two guys you should be comparing and b) as an off season trade you're now talking about a fully healed Mik and Dach wh still wont be up to speed until April 2025 and his injury was a full tear of the ACL and MCL which is more serious.


Forget about the fact that Canucks lose 2 guys that are versatile and have regularly played games in the top 6 and kill penalties and are on the PP and have been successful playing in the bottom 6.
Even if you look at it and see that for next year Dach for Suter is a wash and Mik for Anderson is a wash the Canucks are still giving up a prospect but that probably doesn't matter next year, except its another asset they don't have for the future.
Forget that because more importantly the Canucks as they are trying to build a contender this trade has them take on more cap and take on an extra year of Anderson's contract.

And it is a bad trade for the Habs because you take the bet 7 days a week that Dach will have a better future than Suter long term.

So to conclude Dach for Suter is a huge risk for the Canucks as Dach is over twice as expensive and coming off a major injury and a bad trade for the Habs because Dach is the younger player with potentially more upside.
Mik for Anderson is a bad trade for the Canucks because it adds an extra year of term, but honestly not a bad bet for the Habs and it adds a special teams guy.
Canucks lose a prospect that could be used in a trade that would help them now.
Forum: Armchair-GM7 avr. à 19 h 52
Forum: Armchair-GM6 avr. à 20 h 59
Forum: Armchair-GM6 avr. à 13 h 1