SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Breakaway

Bruins Fan
Membre depuis
29 sept. 2018
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Messages dans les forums
509
Messages par jour
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GM19 avr. 2019 à 8 h 23
Sujet: Two trades to do
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChytilMania</b></div><div>Kevan Miller is not someone Jeff Gorton would be interested in. If I were him, I wouldn’t trade Kreider to the Bruins without either Carlo or Urho Vaakananien in return.</div></div>

? He's very, very comparable to Adam McQuaid who he traded for last season then shipped out. It makes sense for him to do the same thing this year if he needs an extra D because they can sell him at the deadline.

As far as the first trade goes: I like it, I've done the exact trade in one of my own mocks.

The second trade doesn't make much sense for New York. I think if they trade for Miller they are giving up a 4th and 7th like they did McQuaid and then they get it back at the deadline. I don't think they trade Kreider for a package of 2nd round picks and prospects, they need something high end for him.
Forum: Armchair-GM16 avr. 2019 à 18 h 27
Sujet: Boston Arizona very minor trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>I just don't know where you get this stuff at. As someone who played Defense, let me tell you. That crap is a total myth made of people who never laced up.
Let me just put that to end period. How many 18-19 year old defense men you need to see to figure that out. Go tell me McAvoy needed "longer to develop" It's like any other position on the ice. You either have it or you don't. Believe me when I was playing in the NCAA no one was sitting around saying, oh don't worry you guys take longer to develop. That's the biggest bunch of crap ever. Like any sport you learn your position. You are either good at it or you aren't. The only position that has any excuse for taking longer to develop is goalie. And that's because it's hard to find someone to coach it effectively on top of the actual biological factors like bone growing faster than muscle in their teen years. AKA they aren't flexible enough yet.

and by the way, I'd say a 4th liner dumping in 6-7 goals in 30 some game is a pretty nice asset to have. Especially when teams lack secondary scoring.</div></div>

Hey <a href="/users/Pharrow" target="_blank">@Pharrow</a> here is the thread about you talking about how 21 year old defensemen not in the NHL have no value lol. I like how you reference your "own career" and how they aren't flexible enough yet lol. Stupid ass concepts and People who are 22 and not in the NHL yet still have value bro. Happy Day to you!
Forum: Armchair-GM16 avr. 2019 à 18 h 19
Sujet: GAME 4
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>nice made up story. You should keep writing fairy tales.</div></div>

It's actually true and this is just as bad a take. "The only way the (Bruins) will win is gooning it up like they did in game 2." If you're literally stupid enough to think you can make over-generalizations like that it's kind of obvious it must happen a lot and it does. The biggest thing I know is that anyone stupid enough to go on a "The only way a team can win is to do (insert a stupid idea here)" rant is someone who likes to be proven wrong. Nobody would have guessed CLB would be up on Tampa Bay but only a moron would have said a phrase like that.

Be prepared to eat your words bro because the Bruins can win this series but playing better defense, having better Goaltending or even outscoring Toronto among other things so only an idiot would make a suggestion like you made. Bottom line is you're going to be proven wrong more often than not if you go that route so be prepared big guy.
Forum: Armchair-GM10 avr. 2019 à 8 h 27
Sujet: Boston Next Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Username_Bot</b></div><div>I would get away from Puljujarvi if I were you. You will have to pay much more to get him and he has already looked worse and worse. Idk about that minny trade but it doesn't look that bad. other than that Carlo deal. 3 by 3 would be perfect.</div></div>

I like a 6 year deal with Carlo even if it was for 4M per. I'd like to lock him in because he really looks like he's found his game. I feel like 6 years is a good compromise between 8 years and 3 years and the money is in the middle as well.

Puljujarvi is very low risk in this situation. If the Bruins had to give up something of value I'd look elsewhere, but if all they're asking for is a #4 RHD and a project forward I think it's worth the risk. The point in the trade was basically "these two assets are being moved..... what can i package them together for and who has a need for these types of players?" Edmonton looked like a potential fit to me if they move Larsson for a forward which I think they'd be smart to do.
Forum: Armchair-GM10 avr. 2019 à 7 h 59
Sujet: Boston Next Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sun79king</b></div><div>Kinda like this. But we dont know about Backes and he's interest in Minny (or any team else). Still, I hope we can move Backes somewhere to get some cap.
About Puljujärvi, its low risk, high reward type of signing. But he's as far as you can go from "Boston-style-of-game". But we can give him a try.
Maybe put Pulju to the first line next to Brad and Bergy to learn from the best.</div></div>

That's not a bad idea if you're suggesting moving Pasta to line 2 and Coyle to line 3. Coyle would help Studnicka more defensively, so I see a match there. I put Heinen on the line because I think he's got good defensive instincts and positioning, but having Coyle on the other wing would do nothing but help Studnicka's development as well.
Forum: Armchair-GM27 mars 2019 à 20 h 35
Sujet: Bruins
The problem with spending to the cap is that you have players to resign the following season. Letting Krug and Coyle walk would be foolish unless they are asking for more money than they are worth. There isn't really all that much money coming off the books aside from Kevan Miller because Chara has a 1.75M incentive that would probably be on the following seasons cap as bonus overages, Halak's replacement will likely cost a similar amount and letting Wagner / Nordstrom walk won't really save very much. Add in the fact DeBrusk and Grzelcyk need raises and it seems very unlikely the Bruins would sign Nyquist and Maroon and if I'm Nyquist why would I sign a 3 year deal in the first place? If Louie Eriksson can get a 6 year deal in his 30's than Nyquist should be able to get atleast 5 years.