SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Billy316

Jesus Christ Is King
Membre depuis
4 mars 2017
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Deuxième équipe favorite
Red Wings de Detroit
Messages dans les forums
2621
Messages par jour
1.0
Forum: Armchair-GM14 avr. à 17 h 56
Sujet: hronek
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Billy316</b></div><div>Here and requires Waivers
Matheson
Savard
Kovacevic
Harris
Struble in like 14 games?

Players that dont require Waivers but have a year or a less then a years worth of games.

Guhle
Barron
Xhekaj

Players in the NHL or AHL now succeeding or Joining this year

Mailloux
Hutson
Reinbacher
Engstrom who's waiting in the SHL Finals for his opponent after a 4 game sweep in the ECF. Regardless of the Finish he said he'll join Laval on their Playoff Run

Players set to join us in 2 seasons +

Kostenko who after a decent KHL outing as a 19 year old he went to their AHL league version and became a top 10 D in that league .
Konyuskov is a 22 year old Captain of a KHL team playing 22+ minutes a night and became a consistently offensive player especially on special teams.

We need rid of our Veterans TBH
Xhekaj-Mailloux was a hell of a pairing in Laval , i expect that will continue in the NHL
Maybe keep Kovacevic around and re-sign him cheap to help Guhle and Xhekaj lead the team</div></div>

I would love to get rid of our veterans I just don’t believe that management does.
Forum: Armchair-GM14 avr. à 17 h 47
Sujet: Habs 24-25
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Billy316</b></div><div>You dont need any D but thats another conversation
What i wanted to point out is Matheson-Guhle is our top pair most of the year
Savard went out Months blocking 3 shots in a row and gave Guhle basically the first half of the year there
Matheson doesnt get to 60 points IMO if any other Dman in our system players Mathesons RD.
We've seen it the last 2 years that Matheson doesnt play well with others a lot of the time.
He needs a guy capable of handling a lot of 2v1 and 3v1 when he turns over the puck or blows entries.

Guhle for that reason will be here long after Mathesons Traded
Guhle is everything we need him to be at such an early age where he's just Reacting .
Give him space to lead with Matheson and Savard gone , it'll be like with Suter and Weber left NSH leading to the rise of Josi, Ellis and Ekholm</div></div>

It's still not worth giving up Raymond. Who at this point is pretty much untouchable!
Forum: Armchair-GM14 avr. à 16 h 47
Sujet: Habs 24-25
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Billy316</b></div><div>You dont need any D but thats another conversation
What i wanted to point out is Matheson-Guhle is our top pair most of the year
Savard went out Months blocking 3 shots in a row and gave Guhle basically the first half of the year there
Matheson doesnt get to 60 points IMO if any other Dman in our system players Mathesons RD.
We've seen it the last 2 years that Matheson doesnt play well with others a lot of the time.
He needs a guy capable of handling a lot of 2v1 and 3v1 when he turns over the puck or blows entries.

Guhle for that reason will be here long after Mathesons Traded
Guhle is everything we need him to be at such an early age where he's just Reacting .
Give him space to lead with Matheson and Savard gone , it'll be like with Suter and Weber left NSH leading to the rise of Josi, Ellis and Ekholm</div></div>

I don’t disagree, I see him as chip to get a very good top 6 forward (which we may not have in the system). I like your point even and appreciate how well he performed on the right side.

If we draft someone like Sam Dickinson this year, we may have a true number 1 LHD.
Forum: Armchair-GM14 avr. à 15 h 30
Forum: Armchair-GM10 avr. à 7 h 24
Sujet: Lindstrom or Iginla with MTL pick and Cole Hutson with WPGs Pick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Billy316</b></div><div>Insiders said otherwise and even Hughes said TBL called as part of his Transparency Era commitment to the fans he does it alot
That said mostly i went with TBL cause it seemed like an easy one but it really doesnt matter where he goes
Also if you had Savard blocking shots this year then odds are much lower that Sergachev goes out the year after blocking a Parayko shot.
Shot blocking is a skill thats taught but most times its just easier for contenders to load up on Vet's who can do it to save the Skilled players like Sergachev from blocking the big shots.
Whether its CHI in any of their Cup years, LAK in theirs , PIT in theirs or TBL in theirs this is the standard for every NHL Contender but especially for NHL Champions.
Leaving it for the youth to do , hows that worked out so far as you limp into the playoffs despite Kucherov being in God mode to the point you should be a Presidents Trophy Team.

Whether its Savard or someone less skilled at the same role TBL needs to fill that hole if they want to compete again seriously for a cup
I mean its either Hedman or Cernak or Sergachev out the past few years cause they're doing things role players should be because TBL had little success turning inexperienced D into that.
But like i said its not like we need it to be TBL it just seems glaringly obvious if you're going to compete again you'll have to overload the back end again like your 2 cup runs so your skilled players stop getting beat up so badly before the playoffs even show up .

Really PIT makes as much sense given Letang/Karlssons injury issues playing a Savard to absorb shots will only help them out long term given the age of their team
Big Game Dave would fit into that group easier now that i think about it and Dubus was linked to Savard more then anyone so maybe next trade i take a run at PIT instead in hindsight</div></div>

Didn't "insiders " say Schenn was going to TB last season and Hanifin this season? When it comes to TB insiders get a hell of a lot more than a grain of salt.
Forum: Armchair-GM9 avr. à 22 h 14
Sujet: Lindstrom or Iginla with MTL pick and Cole Hutson with WPGs Pick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Billy316</b></div><div>He wont be available , he'll be gone top 15 IMO
But if he or any of the other top 5 D who are ranked ahead of Cole among others are available i'd grab them
But if a team lets Dickinson, Parekh, Levushunov ,Silayev or Buuium is available , you grab them.... but we'd be reaching to say Yakemchuk will be 20th-30th OA
Too many D ranked top 20 this year and the Analyst's who rank Levushunov #2 OA rank Silayev #9 or 10 and the next Analyst thinks the exact opposite.
Its the same thing all along as all the above 5 are ranked top 5 by different analysts while 3 of them are ranked top 3 as well. But all them are also ranked outside top 5 as well

This year in this pick range its best to invest in a Forward actually but if we're looking to Hedge our Bets then going with Any Player who's followed the same developmental path as a player we already drafted who's overachieved, then im taking that guy no matter what his last name is. Its more likely Cole Hutson spends the next 2-3 years making a name for himself and will offer more long term then a later drafted forward in my books unless Cole's gone by then with more D going top 20 then i thought .. then we could land a real stand out forward later in the draft like NYR i believe it was who got Gabe Perrault last year</div></div>

I think you are confusing players Parascak is a rookie forward who plays for Price George in the WHL. He had 105 points in 68 games this year.

I believe you are thinking of Parekh who is a RD that plays for Saginaw of the OHL and has 96 points in 66 games this season. As much as I would love Parehk we aren't taking him unless we lose out on Lindstrom, Eiserman and Iginla