SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Conroy offseason 2

Créé par: mazzucap
Équipe: 2024-25 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 19 juin 2024
Publié: 19 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Post July 1st retentions of Hanifin and Tanev
Missing retentions
Andersson deal likely wouldn’t happen due to Toronto not willing to part with consecutive firsts
Pelletier deal just an idea, fresh start for fresh start
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2825 000 $
1825 000 $
1875 000 $
2875 000 $
1875 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
22 750 000 $
24 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
OTT
  1. Markström, Jacob
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Likely will involve retention on Marky but we’ll see Conroy isn’t a big fan of putting retention on any assets.
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (CHI)
3.
CGY
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Andersson, Rasmus
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
4.
CGY
  1. Heinola, Ville [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Pelletier, Jakob
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de CGY
Logo de OTT
Logo de NJD
Logo de OTT
Logo de WPG
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2388 000 000 $67 150 833 $0 $1 062 500 $20 849 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
RFA
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 juin à 1 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,873
Mentions "j'aime": 20,511
Calgary gets fleeced in all of these trades except the last one, which they still don't do
19 juin à 2 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 2,853
Mentions "j'aime": 2,361
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Calgary gets fleeced in all of these trades except the last one, which they still don't do


I mean the value between #7 and #9 is estimated to be #37 + #111. So basically Markstrom is being traded for an early 2nd and three 4ths which seems pretty fair for no retention.

EDIT: Did pick #6 instead of #7 myb. Difference is #47 + #192. So it'd be a mid 2nd + two 4ths and a 6th.
19 juin à 3 h 2
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 443
Mentions "j'aime": 127
Quoting: StutzlesNumber1Fan
I mean the value between #7 and #9 is estimated to be #37 + #111. So basically Markstrom is being traded for an early 2nd and three 4ths which seems pretty fair for no retention.

EDIT: Did pick #6 instead of #7 myb. Difference is #47 + #192. So it'd be a mid 2nd + two 4ths and a 6th.


the numbers there do make sense. But Markstrom is worth more than that. Even pissy devils fans agree on that lol
StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
19 juin à 3 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,873
Mentions "j'aime": 20,511
Quoting: StutzlesNumber1Fan
I mean the value between #7 and #9 is estimated to be #37 + #111. So basically Markstrom is being traded for an early 2nd and three 4ths which seems pretty fair for no retention.

EDIT: Did pick #6 instead of #7 myb. Difference is #47 + #192. So it'd be a mid 2nd + two 4ths and a 6th.


A couple things. The value of picks is based on average, in this draft the gap between picks 4 and 11 are virtually indistinguishable and really comes down to preference. So the only difference between picks 7 and 9 is the choice of a preferred prospect, and since Calgary needs quality prospects at nearly every position except wing there is zero reason to justify trading a high quality asset like Markstrom to move up 2 spots unless someone like Demidov is still available at #7 for some reason. Also the OP literally says in that trade that retention would likely be involved.
StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
19 juin à 3 h 22
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 2,853
Mentions "j'aime": 2,361
Quoting: The420SusMan69
the numbers there do make sense. But Markstrom is worth more than that. Even pissy devils fans agree on that lol


Yeah true. A lot seem to think Markstrom without retention is worth a late first or an early 2nd though which is fine but at that point I’d rather just go after Ullmark.
19 juin à 4 h 14
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 674
Mentions "j'aime": 135
The Jets already have 5 good forward prospects, their defensive prospect pool is thin. I don't think they take this trade. Heinola is likely starting in the top 6 next year.
19 juin à 9 h 34
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,963
Mentions "j'aime": 12,573
Hawks decline. They aren't paying two 3rd's for a one year Mangiapane rental. They can spend $ in free agency for an equal player and keep their picks.
PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
19 juin à 9 h 40
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 17,556
Mentions "j'aime": 7,695
There's no incentive for Winnipeg to do that. Heinola fills a need on the Jets, Pelletier doesn't.
19 juin à 10 h 8
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,417
Mentions "j'aime": 19,643
Quoting: The420SusMan69
the numbers there do make sense. But Markstrom is worth more than that. Even pissy devils fans agree on that lol


Pissy Devils fans have a small advantage…in that we know the Markstrom’s price agreed upon at the deadline. Without that, we would probably be saying Holtz is too much.
19 juin à 10 h 34
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,798
Mentions "j'aime": 3,068
Easy decline for Chicago.
19 juin à 10 h 44
#11
Rest is a weapon
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 954
Mentions "j'aime": 439
sens accept, retention would be ideal
19 juin à 15 h 46
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 443
Mentions "j'aime": 127
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Pissy Devils fans have a small advantage…in that we know the Markstrom’s price agreed upon at the deadline. Without that, we would probably be saying Holtz is too much.


Yeah it ended up being between the 2 fanbases projections. Seems fair to me
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage